FortiMonitor vs LiveAction LiveNX comparison

Fortinet and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortinet is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3, while BlueCat is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0. Fortinet holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

1,331 Views
731 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

1,322 Views
955 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

LiveAction LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

LiveAction LiveNX and FortiMonitor compete in the network monitoring and management category. Despite LiveAction LiveNX having advantages in customer support satisfaction and cost efficiency, FortiMonitor appears to hold the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and perceived ROI.

Features: LiveAction LiveNX offers network performance monitoring, traffic analysis, and detailed visualizations, providing significant network insights. FortiMonitor offers infrastructure monitoring, flexible alerting, and strong integration abilities, well-suited for diverse environments.

Room for Improvement: LiveAction LiveNX could benefit from expanding its integration options, enhancing its alert customization, and improving its overall adaptability to various infrastructures. FortiMonitor could focus on streamlining its deployment process, simplifying user interface designs, and reducing the learning curve associated with its advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveAction LiveNX is praised for its straightforward deployment and effective customer support, ensuring a seamless implementation process. FortiMonitor provides deployment flexibility with cloud and on-premises options, though it may involve a steeper learning curve. Nevertheless, it is supported by reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: LiveAction LiveNX attracts budget-conscious users with a cost-effective setup and favorable ROI, while FortiMonitor, despite higher initial costs, promises a more substantial ROI due to its comprehensive features and operational efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed FortiMonitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,491 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiMonitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

14th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Alerting and Incident Management (8th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (3rd)

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of FortiMonitor is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

JaimeVasquez

Commercial Manager at IT-Experience

Monitoring capabilities keep operations running smoothly and alerts enhance proactive system management

We use FortiMonitor to monitor the infrastructure of our customers. We check on what is happening with their operations, monitor bandwidth, ensure configurations are appropriate for the customer, and identify if anything is going wrong The most valuable features of FortiMonitor are its redundancy…

Read full review

Mahesh Doshi

IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support

Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"FortiMonitor's dashboard is very informative and user-friendly."

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

"The tool continuously improves, adapting to support new vendors and technologies. Importantly, it automates the process, triggering alerts when devices require attention, and eliminating the need for manual intervention."

"It provides the best firewall features."

"FortiMonitor offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing me to track network traffic in and out effectively."

"FortiMonitor is 100% stable."

More FortiMonitor pros

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

Cons

"Sometimes, we get corruption when upgrading from firmware to the new generation, causing a lot of issues."

"There is room for improvement in the FortiMonitor report. It is not ideal for showcasing to tech customers or managers, especially when trying to display high CPU usage from logins within a specific range of months or the most recent month."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

"The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming."

"Sometimes, during high CPU usage, we cannot access FortiMonitor and must refresh it."

"The tool's price in Vietnam is high, making it an area of concern where improvements can be made."

"FortiMonitor needs to improve its alert system."

"Additionally, there are no AI features in FortiMonitor, which might be an area for enhancement."

More FortiMonitor cons

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"We use the free version."

"It's very expensive."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

29%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What do you like most about FortiMonitor?

In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs FortiMonitor

Compared 19% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 17% of the time

Zabbix vs FortiMonitor

Compared 15% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 10% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 23% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 18% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 11% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 8% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

April 2025

Download FortiMonitor product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Also Known As

Panopta

LiveNX

Overview

FortiMonitor is a comprehensive, SaaS-based digital experience monitoring (DEM) platform that helps organizations modernize their performance-monitoring tools. It provides visibility into endpoint application performance and digital experience—no matter where the user resides or where the application is hosted.

Fortinet

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

April 2025

Free Report: FortiMonitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiMonitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FortiMonitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.