FortiMonitor vs Goliath Performance Monitor comparison

Fortinet and Goliath Technologies are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Fortinet is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.8, while Goliath Technologies is ranked #61. Fortinet holds a 0.8% mindshare in IM, compared to Goliath Technologies’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Goliath Technologies users who would recommend it.

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

1,869 Views
991 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Goliath Performance Monitor

Read 5 Goliath Performance Monitor reviews

580 Views
528 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Goliath Performance Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Goliath Performance Monitor and FortiMonitor compete in network monitoring solutions. While FortiMonitor shines with rich features, Goliath Performance Monitor has the edge in pricing structure and customer satisfaction.

Features: Goliath Performance Monitor offers comprehensive monitoring, predictive insights, and detailed reporting. FortiMonitor is known for advanced security integrations, scalability, and real-time updates.

Room for Improvement: Goliath could enhance its security features, real-time capabilities, and scalability. FortiMonitor might improve its ease of use, deployment complexity, and customer interaction experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Goliath Performance Monitor is favored for its straightforward deployment and responsive support, enhancing user experience. FortiMonitor also provides an efficient setup with robust documentation but can present deployment challenges due to potential technical complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Goliath Performance Monitor offers a competitive pricing model, leading to quicker ROI with its simple setup and resource efficiency. FortiMonitor, while more costly upfront, provides long-term value through an extensive feature set and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed FortiMonitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FortiMonitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (22nd), IT Alerting and Incident Management (10th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (7th)

Goliath Performance Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

61st

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of FortiMonitor is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Goliath Performance Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
FortiMonitor	0.8%
Goliath Performance Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.7%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer2677554

Network Engineer III at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing diverse networks with detailed alerts enhances device oversight

FortiManager is very helpful in managing our networks. We use it to manage 20 farms and various networks with hundreds of devices. The version we are using provides more detail than the older dashboard. We appreciate the alerting capabilities, which are integrated with SolarWinds to notify our team via SMS.

Read full review

networke29316

Senior Systems Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees

Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive

It looks like it is easy to scale, but I don't know how far it can go out. We are only a 300, or 400 person company. We are not terribly large. It looks like it should be able to scale up until 10,000 at least. There are two users in the company who use this solution, I use it, and the helpdesk.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"FortiMonitor offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing me to track network traffic in and out effectively."

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is the overall ability to monitor the health of the environment."

"The solution helps to see client infrastructure. It has many boxes and blinks green or red when the station goes up or down. We have different domains for the device groups that we monitor."

"Fortinet's customer support is very good."

"The tool continuously improves, adapting to support new vendors and technologies. Importantly, it automates the process, triggering alerts when devices require attention, and eliminating the need for manual intervention."

More FortiMonitor pros

"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."

"Offers a diversity of features."

Cons

"Additionally, there are no AI features in FortiMonitor, which might be an area for enhancement."

"Sometimes, we get corruption when upgrading from firmware to the new generation, causing a lot of issues."

"The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming."

"FortiMonitor could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems, such as Linux."

"We use FortiToken, and it's a pain to use because you have to send things through your phone and then confirm by email. Only after this can you log in. It's dual-factor authentication. I wish that I could just log in or bring up a dashboard where I could log in from."

"Sometimes, during high CPU usage, we cannot access FortiMonitor and must refresh it."

"FortiMonitor's monitoring could be much better. It should be like, in Palo Alto."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

More FortiMonitor cons

"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."

"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"The price seems reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

University

17%

Healthcare Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What do you like most about FortiMonitor?

In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 20% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs FortiMonitor

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs FortiMonitor

Compared 8% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 23% of the time

ControlUp vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 18% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 15% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Goliath Performance Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

More Goliath Performance Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

December 2025

Download FortiMonitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Goliath Performance Monitor

January 2026

Download Goliath Performance Monitor product report

Also Known As

Panopta

No data available

Overview

FortiMonitor is a comprehensive, SaaS-based digital experience monitoring (DEM) platform that helps organizations modernize their performance-monitoring tools. It provides visibility into endpoint application performance and digital experience—no matter where the user resides or where the application is hosted.

Fortinet

Goliath Performance Monitor offers proactive, end-to-end IT performance monitoring for Citrix & VMware to ensure a positive end user experience. Goliath Performance Monitor provides complete support for monitoring virtual server, virtual desktop and hybrid cloud environments, and provides specialized modules for certain EMR/EHR applications and NVIDIA GRID vGPU. Goliath Performance Monitor has been architected from the ground up to help IT administrators anticipate end user experience issues, troubleshoot the root cause, and deploy remediation actions quickly before end users complain.

Goliath Technologies

Sample Customers

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

Walmart, Facebook, Xerox, UHS, ADP, Wyndham Worldwide

Buyer's Guide

FortiMonitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

January 2026

Free Report: FortiMonitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about FortiMonitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our FortiMonitor vs. Goliath Performance Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.