We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Forter vs ThreatMetrix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Forter Logo
2,067 views|1,008 comparisons
ThreatMetrix Logo
2,265 views|1,533 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."

More Forter Pros →

"The most valuable thing is about the IP. They have a database of malicious IP addresses against which they check. They have a huge database for routed devices and the devices that have been used in the past to commit fraud. They have extensive historical records of all of that information, and that's probably the most valuable thing about ThreatMetrix. Over the years, they have been collecting and persisting globally across all the banking and financial services. They have been storing all this information. It is this stored information that I and my team find valuable; it is not so much their technology. If you are running it on a simulator and trying to maliciously clone and copy IP addresses and stuff like that, they have a bunch of technologies, like routes section and all the other stuff. It is just that they have something that no one else can deal with, that is, massive amounts of big data about the malicious IP addresses, malicious device fingerprinting, the fingerprinting router devices, and the fingerprints. You can query against this stored information to find out whether your app is in a good, nice environment. If yes, you get a green light. The last time I checked, there were about 400 or 500 features that they can stack against, which is pretty extensive. They give you a score against all those features for every application that you installed on it. It is pretty good in that sense.""The user interface, the portal, is very helpful in describing what attributes of concern are associated with the device.""Accessible custom rules with a monthly update on performance.""There is excellent documentation available.""The most valuable feature the solution has is that it is able to do a fairly accurate fraud assessment of a credit card transaction based on a variety of parameters configured by the merchant."

More ThreatMetrix Pros →

Cons
"Lacking granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."

More Forter Cons →

"We are only using one feature. We haven't found the other features to be very good or very powerful.""One limitation is it only maintains six months' worth of data. It would be nice if it went back even further to help us really identify and flush out patterns that go on longer.""Could be more intuitive and user friendly.""SDK is probably where the biggest issue is. The SDK configuration is a bit lacking. If you are integrating it into your workflow, it is very cumbersome and very difficult to integrate. You have to understand and be an expert in low-level mobile applications to integrate this stuff. Integration should be easy based on what they are providing, but unfortunately, it is not. It is very difficult. My work has been trying to simplify the integration process because integrations bring a lot of value. Most companies don't see their value because it is such a difficult process. For integration, you have to get it right as well, but it is very difficult to get it right because they don't help you in tuning your future parameters. Because of this, it is very difficult to tune your future parameters and your risk score. If you are Uber, your risk score will be very different from a banking client that is pushing funds. These two things need to be improved for me. The rest is pretty good.""It would be useful if they could offer real-time processing."

More ThreatMetrix Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I am not aware of the price. I have always come in after it has been negotiated. The clients do get a return on their investment. It mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms. They have definitely got their ROI back because there is continued investment in ThreatMetrix over time."
  • More ThreatMetrix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Ranking
    Views
    2,067
    Comparisons
    1,008
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    582
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    2,265
    Comparisons
    1,533
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    1,259
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Forter provides instant, guaranteed approve/decline decisions for every transaction, removing the burden and uncertainty of fraud.

    The system is designed to treat all orders as “innocent unless proven guilty” to ensure high approval rates and frictionless checkout. Since Forter only charges for approved transactions, our interests are always aligned with yours. Moreover, our confidence in the system’s accuracy means we do not hesitate to offer a full fraud chargeback guarantee.

    ThreatMetrix Digital Identity Network constantly identifies fraudsters from trusted customers by analyzing more than 850 transactions each second of every day. It defends against data breach and credential testing from bots designed to mimic human behavior and evade detection by web application firewalls and integrates fraud and risk data across the enterprise with behavioral information on more than 1.4 billion digital identities for smarter, faster and better risk decisioning.
    Offer
    Learn more about Forter
    Learn more about ThreatMetrix
    Sample Customers
    Kiwi.com, Fiverr, James Allen
    Trip Advisor, Stone Hub, TD Bank, Rabobank, GoPro
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider30%
    Computer Software Company24%
    Retailer11%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Insurance Company6%
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, Forter and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: January 2022.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Forter is ranked 3rd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 1 review while ThreatMetrix is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 5 reviews. Forter is rated 9.0, while ThreatMetrix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Forter writes "Great at detecting fraudulent behavior and has reduced our financial losses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatMetrix writes "It has a huge database of malicious IP addresses and gives a score for your environment". Forter is most compared with Riskified, Signifyd, Kount, Ravelin and Accertify Interceptas, whereas ThreatMetrix is most compared with BioCatch, iovation FraudForce, IBM Trusteer, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub and RSA Adaptive Authentication.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.