We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and Microsoft Entra Permissions Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management."Their access management solution, OpenAM, is most valuable because it meets the needs of a lot of users."
"I like the intelligent authentication feature."
"The support is good and prompt."
"Easy to customize and adaptable to any environment."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent."
"We used it to implement multi-factor authentication and to improve our security posture as well as reducing the potential for attacks."
"I like the way it is handling authentication and authorization."
"We create and define the permissions and configurations for the users."
"Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"The solution requires more simplified customization. However, part of the problem is my clients determining their own preferences. Technology can help and do many things, but you have to define your own policies to ensure that the solution or service works within those parameters. Helping customers understand their business and different processes is another issue not relating to the functionality of this solution."
"The product's support services in the French language are not free."
"I think the upgrade process is sometimes a little complicated and there are failures that occur."
"I find that it's quite expensive for just an open-source system. Support is quite expensive."
"We raised tickets asking for improvements, but sometimes we don't get the proper solution. They are responding, but the ticket is open for weeks and weeks. For some issues, we don't get a satisfactory solution or the solution doesn't work."
"As with any complex software platform, there is a learning curve to using ForgeRock, and it may require specialized expertise to implement and manage effectively."
"They should improve the solution by include reporting."
"It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement."
"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ForgeRock is ranked 4th in Access Management with 27 reviews while Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is ranked 5th in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) with 1 review. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management writes "Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, PingID, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Symantec Siteminder, whereas Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Identity Manager, Saviynt, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Tenable Cloud Security.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
