Forcepoint ZTNA vs Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Forcepoint ZTNA and Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: February 2024).
756,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Ninety percent of the feedback I received from company partners is that Forcepoint ZTNA is an expensive product."
  • More Forcepoint ZTNA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.
    756,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:What I like about Forcepoint ZTNA is that you could use it as a starting point because you have one agent that allows you to add more features. Other technologies require one agent per solution, so… more »
    Top Answer:Ninety percent of the feedback I received from company partners is that Forcepoint ZTNA is an expensive product. However, you still have other factors to consider, such as product features… more »
    Top Answer:Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    15th
    out of 32 in ZTNA
    Views
    101
    Comparisons
    40
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    597
    Rating
    7.0
    11th
    out of 32 in ZTNA
    Views
    420
    Comparisons
    320
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Waverley Labs
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Implement Zero Trust policies easily, verifying remote workers and giving them access to only the private apps they need – not all apps in internal data centers and private clouds. Protect internal apps against potentially compromised remote devices and data theft.

    SDP – provides knowledge of who connected, from where, to what, when etc. in real-time and with far fewer resources than SEIMs require.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    ManTech International Corporation
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    ZTNA
    February 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA. Updated: February 2024.
    756,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Forcepoint ZTNA is ranked 15th in ZTNA with 1 review while Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is ranked 11th in ZTNA. Forcepoint ZTNA is rated 7.0, while Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Forcepoint ZTNA writes "You can add multiple features on a single agent, but it's an expensive product, and its marketing approach should be more aggressive". On the other hand, Forcepoint ZTNA is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for ZTA, whereas Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is most compared with Appgate SDP.

    See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.