Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fivetran vs Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.6
Fivetran offers significant time and cost-saving benefits, simplifying data integration and maintenance while reducing reliance on data engineers.
Sentiment score
7.9
Informatica PowerExchange boosts decision-making and ROI through streamlined data management and cost-effective integration across data sources.
Fivetran provides time savings, cost reductions, and improvements in data quality.
Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot
It saves us the effort of having one to two data engineers managing the tasks that Fivetran handles.
Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab
It is considered cost-efficient because it leads to the re-utilization of channels and platforms, which saves time and money.
Sr. IT & Data Governance and Management Consultant & Technical Lead at a government with 51-200 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
Fivetran customer support is efficient yet sometimes slow, rated 7-9, with calls for improved critical issue communication.
Sentiment score
7.1
Feedback on Informatica PowerExchange support is mixed, with praise for reliability but concern over response times, averaging 7-8/10 ratings.
If they could provide support more quickly, that would be great.
Manager at InfoCepts
The technical support provided by Fivetran has generally been good, with a response time and competence that I would rate as good.
Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab
Customer support from Fivetran is quite good; it's really nice and responsive.
Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot
Their support aligns with what I have experienced with Informatica data quality teams, and it is quite effective.
IT Manager - Data Quality and Migration at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Informatica's technical support team is very supportive and provides help whenever required.
Sr. IT & Data Governance and Management Consultant & Technical Lead at a government with 51-200 employees
The support was good enough, and they were able to resolve all the issues I raised in the past.
Senior Analyst at North Oil Company
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Fivetran scales well for various businesses, accommodating data needs but can be costly and complex for smaller enterprises.
Sentiment score
7.0
Informatica PowerExchange is scalable for big data, though some find limitations in flexibility and high availability.
Fivetran's scalability has been tested effectively, and it has been working well for our organization's growing data needs.
Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Users generally express high satisfaction with Fivetran's stable reliability, despite occasional issues with API connections and custom setups.
Sentiment score
7.7
Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] is reliable but needs improvements in handling high loads, error clarity, and log visibility.
They have 99.9% accuracy on the data load and they maintain transparency.
Manager at InfoCepts
In my experience, Fivetran is stable with very few instances of downtime or reliability issues.
Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot
During the duration of the time that we used Fivetran, it was highly stable.
Founder at a marketing services firm with 1-10 employees
Technical errors sometimes occur, such as network breakages at the source level, which breaks connectivity.
Senior Analyst at North Oil Company
 

Room For Improvement

Fivetran needs improvements in connectors, real-time processing, user interface, pricing, support, documentation, and integration capabilities.
Informatica PowerExchange needs improved integration, user-friendliness, and enhancements in big data, real-time processing, and automation capabilities.
From a cost perspective, if the number of connectors is lesser, then Fivetran is not the most cost-efficient option.
Founder at a marketing services firm with 1-10 employees
When we tried to use a built-in Oracle connector, it didn't allow for the tweaks we needed, which led us to the SDK connector route and caused delays in development.
Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot
Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users.
Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab
One area that could be improved is performance, as PowerExchange sometimes has less performance compared to native connectors when dealing with a huge volume of data.
Senior Analyst at North Oil Company
The addition of data quality dashboards or measures would also help in profiling data to assess its health before sharing or moving it.
Sr. IT & Data Governance and Management Consultant & Technical Lead at a government with 51-200 employees
 

Setup Cost

Fivetran's pricing is high, favoring larger enterprises with discounts available; smaller companies may find it prohibitive.
Informatica PowerExchange pricing is capacity-based with moderate to high costs, favored for integration capabilities and cost efficiency.
Our current yearly contract for Fivetran is approximately $70,000.
Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab
Informatica PowerExchange is considered cost-efficient due to reduced number of APIs needed.
Sr. IT & Data Governance and Management Consultant & Technical Lead at a government with 51-200 employees
The pricing and cost depend heavily on SAP's licensing structure, especially if using SAP integration services.
IT Manager - Data Quality and Migration at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Fivetran is valued for seamless data replication, user-friendly interface, scalability, and minimal coding, enabling efficient data handling.
Informatica PowerExchange [EOL] excels in data transformation, connectivity, and integration, efficiently handling large data volumes with flexibility.
The most valuable feature of Fivetran is its built-in connectors for a wide range of data sources.
Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab
The real-time data replication is what I see best in the market where it reduces the overhead of customers needing to maintain the pipeline.
Manager at InfoCepts
Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner.
Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot
It also reduces the number of APIs needed for new integrations by offering a unified exchange platform.
Sr. IT & Data Governance and Management Consultant & Technical Lead at a government with 51-200 employees
The primary advantage of Informatica PowerExchange is being able to extract data from source systems that Informatica does not natively support.
Senior Analyst at North Oil Company
PowerExchange is one of the best software solutions to build integrations with non-Oracle or standard database services, especially for SAP and Hana products.
IT Manager - Data Quality and Migration at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (11th), Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (8th)
Informatica PowerExchange [...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot
Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors
I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.
HA
Sr. IT & Data Governance and Management Consultant & Technical Lead at a government with 51-200 employees
Facilitates seamless data exchange for Middle Eastern government entities while reducing costs and simplifying integration processes
Informatica PowerExchange is important for services and common services implementations. This allows workflow communication between different entities, providing proper services. The tool's governance features include HA rules, responsibilities, and policies which are highly valued. It also reduces the number of APIs needed for new integrations by offering a unified exchange platform that facilitates easy-to-use services without the need for coding.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
884,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
6%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?
As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...
Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?
I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...
How much traffic can HVR Software handle?
As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Informatica PowerExchange?
Informatica PowerExchange is considered cost-efficient due to reduced number of APIs needed, enabling re-utilization of existing channels, cutting down on development and training costs.
What needs improvement with Informatica PowerExchange?
It would be helpful to have more metadata provided, which is useful for engaging more users in data exchange. The addition of data quality dashboards or measures would also help in profiling data t...
 

Also Known As

No data available
PowerExchange, Connectors
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure
ACH Food, BNSF Railway Company, Illinois State University
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Qlik and others in Data Integration. Updated: February 2026.
884,266 professionals have used our research since 2012.