Trellix Advanced Threat Defense vs Trellix Network Detection and Response comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Trellix Advanced Threat Defense and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).
To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
HossamSelim
Archie Scorgie
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server.""Provides good exfiltration, and is an all-in-one product.""It is stable and reliable.""The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module.""It is very scalable.""I recommend this solution because of its ease of use.""It stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Pros →

"It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities.""The server appliance is good.""The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design.""The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks.""Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities.""Before FireEye, most of the times that an incident would happen nobody would be able to find out where or why the incident occurred and that the system is compromised. FireEye is a better product because if the incident already happened I know that the breach is there and that the system is compromised so we can take appropriate action to prevent anything from happening.""I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went.""The product is very easy to configure."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pros →

Cons
"We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats.""Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet.""Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version.""This solution needs to be made "cloud ready".""There could be a tool that automatically updates all-new Microsoft IPs, which are available for free to connect to the client.""The initial setup was industry standard complex. It takes awhile and has a lot of planning involved. It could be simplified with product redesign.""I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Cons →

"It is an expensive solution.""It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto.""Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone.""It is very expensive, the price could be better.""We'd like the potential for better scaling.""FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically.""There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management.""I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet."

More Trellix Network Detection and Response Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."
  • "Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."
  • More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing and licensing are reasonable compared to competitors."
  • "The pricing is a little high."
  • "Because of what the FireEye product does, it has significantly decreased our mean time in being able to identify and detect malicious threats. The company that I work with is a very mature organization, and we have seen the meantime to analysis decrease by at least tenfold."
  • "There are some additional services that I understand the vendor provides, but our approach was to package all of the features that we were looking to use into the product."
  • "We're partners with Cisco so we get a reasonable price. It's cheaper than Palo Alto in terms of licensing."
  • "FireEye is comparable to other products, such as HX, but seems expensive. It may cause us to look at other products in the market."
  • "When I compare this solution to its competitors in the market, I find that it is a little expensive."
  • "The user fee is not as high but the maintenance fee is expensive."
  • More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product offers good pricing. It was not very expensive.
    Top Answer:The scalability could be better. We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats. In sandboxing, the time to respond is slower than we would like. We'd like them to be able to process… more »
    Top Answer:Over the thirteen years of using the product, we have not experienced a single compromise in our environment. During the COVID period, we faced numerous DDoS attacks, and the tool proved highly… more »
    Top Answer:Certain features in Trellix Network Detection and Response, such as using AL-type commands, may initially pose a challenge for those unfamiliar with such commands. However, once users become… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    811
    Comparisons
    564
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    548
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    1,942
    Comparisons
    1,376
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    381
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    McAfee Advanced Threat Defense
    FireEye Network Security, FireEye
    Learn More
    Trellix
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Powerful advanced threat detection

    Uncover Hidden Threats

    Combine in-depth static code analysis, dynamic analysis (malware sandboxing), and machine learning to increase zero-day threat and ransomware detection.

    Threat Intelligence Sharing

    Immediately share threat intelligence across your entire infrastructure—including multi-vendor ecosystems—to reduce time from threat encounter to containment.

    Enable Investigation

    Validate threats and access critical indicators of compromise (IoCs) needed for investigation and threat hunting.

    Detect the undetectable and stop evasive attacks. Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) helps your team focus on real attacks, contain intrusions with speed and intelligence, and eliminate your cybersecurity weak points.

    Sample Customers
    The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust
    FFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Security Firm14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Government12%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is ranked 20th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 8 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 35 reviews. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is rated 7.8, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense writes "Easy to set up and use with a nice interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Blocks traffic and DDoS attacks ". Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Fortinet FortiSandbox and Microsoft Defender for Identity, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Arbor DDoS.

    See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

    We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.