Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense comparison

Microsoft Defender for Identity vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Download the complete report

Helped 894,668 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Iden...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

8th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (5th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (3rd)

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Identity is 3.6%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is 2.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Defender for Identity	3.6%
Trellix Advanced Threat Defense	2.1%
Other	94.3%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Oluwa Adetunji

CyberSecurity Engineer | Information Security Management at Self Employed

Automation and threat intelligence streamline threat response and user management

In Microsoft Defender for Identity, I would appreciate improvements in providing information on conditional access. They have added more control that can be put in place, which was not present years ago. They have also integrated Azure Information Protection where policies can be configured. The Self-Service Password Reset (SSPR) allows users to reset their passwords, which is a valuable tool for remote workers. They have added more features into conditional access that integrate with other components, including SSPR and Identity Information Protection, trusted IPs, and locations. These configurations in trusted IP addresses are integrated into conditional access and control the applications I want to secure. Regarding impossible travel scenarios, I can either block the user or grant access while requesting multi-factor authentication. They should improve the automation for impossible travel detection. When connected to Wi-Fi and then to VPN, the system sometimes interprets the IP address change as impossible travel. If Microsoft could develop a feature that indicates when impossible travel is caused by VPN connections, it would prevent unnecessary password resets and session disruptions, especially for VIP users in organizations.

Read full review

Philippe Panardie

RSSI at SDIS49

Ensuring long-term reliability while seeking internal email management enhancements

Prisma is a commercial name of the firewall now, but we don't work with the cloud product. Only our company is using it and we do not recommend it to customers. For us, it's transparent because it's a cloud product, so we don't really know the version as it's always updated. We have not had any problem, but it's difficult to report on what's going on because some days they can wash out perhaps 100 mails, and then it's difficult to say how many attacks you have reached. The right email has been washed out and then nobody has complained. We do not use the Threat Visualization feature; as we are in MX, the mail is washed out before it is in the mail inbox of the user, thus avoiding any problem requiring a reservation. In fact, there is no integration with existing security frameworks. The only problem we can have is that as we have no API interface, there is no inspection of internal mail. I rate Trellix Advanced Threat Defense a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers excellent visibility into threats."

"The feature I like the most about Defender for Identity is the entity tags. They give you the ability to identify sensitive accounts, devices, and groups. You also have honeytoken entities, which are devices that are identified as "bait" for fraudulent actors."

"Microsoft Defender for Identity helps me automate routine tasks and find alerts that I set up to receive, so it helps me get where I'm trying to go easier and faster."

"I think that for a defensive view, it can give most administrators absolutely amazing insight into what's happening in the network that they probably never had before."

"It is easy to set up. Based on the number of devices you would like to set up, you can use scripts, Group Policy, etc. It takes five minutes to set up."

"In the security portfolio that we manage, Microsoft Defender for Identity is very important because it is the professional service that we sell the most."

"This solution has advanced a lot over the last few years."

"It gives companies a lot of insights that they didn't have before and has increased the security posture significantly."

More Microsoft Defender for Identity pros

"I recommend this solution because of its ease of use."

"It was easy to set up initially."

"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module."

"I see ROI, as it stops in excess of twenty-five malware events per month, all of which could be critical to the business."

"This solution is very easy to use and requires little to no training."

"Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server."

"If a system admin can put in the patience to read and constantly update the ePO system in terms of rules, enforcing them at regular intervals, you can safely go to sleep every night."

"It is stable and reliable."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense pros

Cons

"The solution could improve how it handles on-premises Android-related attacks."

"The areas of Microsoft Defender for Identity that can be improved include its cost, which is quite expensive when integrated into Sentinel. Additionally, there is room for improvement in its integration with non-Microsoft applications and systems."

"The solution could be better at using group-managed access and they could replace it with broad-based access controls."

"When the data leaves the cloud, there are security issues."

"There is no option to remedy an issue directly from the console. If we see an alert, we can't fix it from the console. Instead, we must depend on other Microsoft products, such as MDE. That is a significant drawback. It simply works as a scanner, which can sometimes put enough load on the sensors. Immediate actions should be possible from the dashboard because. It can prevent issues from spreading further."

"The impact of the sensors on the domain controllers can be quite high depending on your loads. I don't know if there's any room for improvement there, but that's one of the things that might be improved."

"When the data leaves the cloud, there are security issues."

"Microsoft Defender for Identity does not save me time, but I think it is the way that I secure the data."

More Microsoft Defender for Identity cons

"I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."

"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."

"The support on their side is not readily available. It takes a while."

"The only problem we can have is that as we have no API interface, there is no inspection of internal mail."

"We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats."

"Some of our customers have mentioned the lack of a tool that would allow for remote capabilities without being attached to the internet."

"Lacks remote capabilities not dependent on the internet."

"We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is very affordable considering that other SIEM solutions are much more expensive and have many more licensing restrictions and fees."

"You won't be able to change your tenants from where you deploy them. For example, if you select Canada, they will charge you based on Canadian pricing. If you are also in London, when you deploy in Canada, the pound is higher than Canadian dollars, but your platform resources are billable in Canadian dollars. Using your pounds to pay for any of these things will be cheaper. Or, if you deploy in London, they will charge you based on your local currency."

"Microsoft Defender for Identity comes as part of the Microsoft E5 licensing stack."

"The product is costly, and we had multiple discussions with accounting to receive a discounted rate. However, on the open market, the tool is expensive."

"Defender for Identity is a little more expensive than other Microsoft products. Identity and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are both a bit costly."

"Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."

"The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for Identity?

I really would have to sit down to think about how Microsoft Defender for Identity can be improved. I didn't take stock in what needs to be improved because I appreciated having the tools right the...

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Defender for Identity?

My main use cases for Microsoft Defender for Identity include Conditional Access, checking risky users, remediating risky users, and user sign-ins. I can easily remediate or determine what the user...

What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Defender for Identity?

I don't really use Microsoft Defender for Identity a lot because my new role doesn't allow me to take time to do so. I don't really use the threat intelligence feature of Microsoft Defender for Ide...

What needs improvement with McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

I would like to see an API interface for internal email and control of outgoing email to make it closer to 10. It's necessary; today we have an MX interface, and it would be interesting to have an ...

What is your primary use case for McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

We are working with Palo Alto products, specifically firewalls. We are only using Palo Alto Firewalls and not Cortex. With FireEye and Trellix, we only work with ETP now because the NDR function wh...

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed ITDR vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs Microsoft Defender for Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Identity Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 11% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 10% of the time

Check Point Infinity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 10% of the time

Morphisec vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 6% of the time

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Defender for Identity

Download Microsoft Defender for Identity product report

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Download Trellix Advanced Threat Defense product report

Also Known As

Azure Advanced Threat Protection, Azure ATP, MS Defender for Identity

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Identity offers real-time threat detection and protection for hybrid Active Directory environments. It integrates with Microsoft 365 components for seamless security and monitors advanced behaviors, enhancing identity protection across cloud and on-premises environments.

Microsoft Defender for Identity provides detailed threat insights and user behavior analytics to detect unauthorized access and notify anomalies. It allows setting custom detection rules, enhancing threat response automation. While it needs improvements in cloud security, SIEM integration, and access controls, users leverage its ability to mitigate identity threats like suspicious logins and ransomware. Enhanced integration with Microsoft security products ensures a coordinated threat response for identity control and privilege management.

What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Identity?

Active Directory Federation: Seamlessly integrates with Microsoft 365 for comprehensive security.
Real-time Security Monitoring: Provides immediate insights into advanced user behaviors and potential threats.
Threat Insights: Delivers detailed analysis of threats with the ability to customize detection rules.
User Behavior Analytics: Analyzes user activities to detect anomalies and potential risks.
Identity Protection: Offers comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments.

What benefits should users expect from reviews of Microsoft Defender for Identity?

Unauthorized Access Prevention: Identifies potential unauthorized activities with advanced detection mechanisms.
Anomaly Notification: Alerts users to unexpected activities within their environments.
Threat Response Automation: Facilitates rapid response to threats with automated solutions.
Enhanced Cloud Security: Strengthens identity management across hybrid and cloud frameworks.

In specific industries, organizations implement Microsoft Defender for Identity to secure on-premises and hybrid Active Directory environments through user and entity behavior analytics, malicious activity detection, and integration with Microsoft security tools. This approach enhances security posture assessment and helps mitigate identity threats like identity harvesting and unauthorized access.

Microsoft

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense offers efficient threat detection and automatic threat remediation, featuring seamless management and integration with operating systems and extensions.

Providing robust malware defense, Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is easy to set up and use. Its components work collaboratively, with standout features like behavioral analysis, retro-inspection, and ePolicy Orchestration. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in Active Directory integration, cloud readiness, artificial intelligence, and faster sandboxing. The API interface and scalability need enhancement, while better compatibility with platforms like Cisco could elevate its function. Effective for server and endpoint security, it effectively blocks threats like WannaCry and disperses attack data through the DXL client quickly.

What are the notable features of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense?

Management and Automatic Threat Remediation: Facilitates seamless management and handling of threats.
Effective Threat Detection and Response: Delivers efficient and reliable threat detection capabilities.
Behavioral Analysis and Retro-Inspection: Offers advanced analysis for comprehensive threat identification.
ePolicy Orchestration: Streamlines processes for enhanced threat management.
Scalability and Price: Provides a stable and scalable solution at a competitive price point.

What key benefits can be identified from reviews?

Ease of Use and Setup: Known for its straightforward implementation and user-friendly interface.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with different operating systems and technologies like Palo Alto firewalls.
Threat Protection Efficiency: Proven effectiveness in stopping threats such as WannaCry.
Rapid Attack Information Dissemination: Utilizes the DXL client for quick data sharing.

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is widely used across numerous industries for server and desktop protection, ensuring endpoint security and halting attacks without failure. Its integration with diverse technologies enhances protection in varied environments, making it a valuable tool in enterprise security management.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Microsoft Defender for Identity is trusted by companies such as St. Luke’s University Health Network, Ansell, and more.

The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust

Microsoft Defender for Identity vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense