Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense comparison

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Download the complete report

Helped 893,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Advanced Threat Def...

Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks WildFire is 7.4%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is 2.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks WildFire	7.4%
Trellix Advanced Threat Defense	2.1%
Other	90.5%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Featured Reviews

Eng298815

Engineer at Taalumgroup

Achieve effective threat prevention and seamless integration with powerful technical support

Integration with third-party products is possible. For example, connecting a mail gateway with Palo Alto Networks WildFire allows them to handle prevention. Palo Alto Networks WildFire is a cloud-based sandboxing solution. The firewall is connected to WildFire, and XDR performs sandboxing from the cloud. WildFire conducts malware scanning and emulation, then informs the firewall to block threats based on the response. It also generates reports regarding malware and other issues. The sandboxing process involves sending sample files to the cloud for scanning, checking file authenticity, certificates, and detecting malicious code. WildFire performs multiple checks and informs the XDR agent about file status. This automatic process occurs within minutes or seconds. For unknown or suspicious files, immediate blocking occurs while samples are sent to WildFire for identification. I rate Palo Alto Networks WildFire a 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Philippe Panardie

RSSI at SDIS49

Ensuring long-term reliability while seeking internal email management enhancements

Prisma is a commercial name of the firewall now, but we don't work with the cloud product. Only our company is using it and we do not recommend it to customers. For us, it's transparent because it's a cloud product, so we don't really know the version as it's always updated. We have not had any problem, but it's difficult to report on what's going on because some days they can wash out perhaps 100 mails, and then it's difficult to say how many attacks you have reached. The right email has been washed out and then nobody has complained. We do not use the Threat Visualization feature; as we are in MX, the mail is washed out before it is in the mail inbox of the user, thus avoiding any problem requiring a reservation. In fact, there is no integration with existing security frameworks. The only problem we can have is that as we have no API interface, there is no inspection of internal mail. I rate Trellix Advanced Threat Defense a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The threat intelligence from WildFire supports our proactive defense strategies."

"What I like about Palo Alto is that it is a complete product, with everything in it."

"Stability is never a concern."

"You have better control because you define apps. You just don't define ports. You define apps, and the apps are monitored in the traffic. It is more specific than the Cisco firewall when it comes to our needs."

"Customer service is excellent; their support is top-tier for sure."

"Palo Alto Networks WildFire is a very comprehensive device."

"Palo Alto Networks WildFire can detect many types of attacks that are using malware embedded on files/URLs with minimum time, and it can increase the effectiveness of resources (time and people) to prevent the malware."

"In this case, the Palo Alto Networks WildFire capability is very important and I would say very impressive."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire pros

"Provides good exfiltration, and is an all-in-one product."

"If a system admin can put in the patience to read and constantly update the ePO system in terms of rules, enforcing them at regular intervals, you can safely go to sleep every night."

"It is stable and reliable."

"Its greatest strength is the DXL client which can rapidly disseminate attack information to all clients via the McAfee Agent instead of going through the ePO server."

"This solution is very easy to use and requires little to no training."

"The features I find most valuable are: the management, the ability for automatic remediation of threats and it can successfully detect a threat, and to act upon it."

"I recommend this solution because of its ease of use."

"The most valuable features are the administration console and its detection and response module."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense pros

Cons

"The global product feature needs improvement, the VPN, and we need some enhanced features."

"Perhaps an anti-spam feature could be considered."

"In the future, I would like to see more automation in the reporting."

"In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release of Palo Alto Networks WildFire, each release is based on malware that has been identified. The key problem is an average of six months from the time malware is written to the time it's discovered and a signature is created for it. The only advice that I can give is for them to shorten that timeframe. I don't know how they would do it, but if they shorten that, for example, cut it in half, they'll make themselves more famous."

"The cyber security visibility and forensics features to receive more information about incidents could improve in Palo Alto Networks WildFire."

"The automation and responsiveness need improvement."

"The threat intelligence that we receiving in the reporting was not as expected. We were expecting more."

"In my opinion, it could be developed to be dependent not only on signatures, but also on patterns and behavior of malware."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire cons

"Make the ATD system a part of the whole product and take the whole thing onto the cloud. While it is there already, it is not to the same level as the on-premise version."

"Some of our customers have mentioned the lack of a tool that would allow for remote capabilities without being attached to the internet."

"This product does the job, but it is not flexible enough to do new environments yet."

"The support on their side is not readily available. It takes a while."

"There could be a tool that automatically updates all-new Microsoft IPs, which are available for free to connect to the client."

"Make the ATD appliance a part of the whole product offering and take the whole thing onto the cloud."

"I would like to see future versions of the solution incorporate artificial intelligence technology."

"We'd like them to be better at dealing with script threats."

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Palo Alto Networks WildFire could improve. It is expensive. There is an annual subscription to use the solution."

"The physical appliance is around €3,000 or €4,000, and then, you have the licensing for a year for around €3,000."

"The pricing and licensing option should be categorized for various countries such as for Bangladesh."

"The pricing is affordable and fixed."

"The solution is worth its price"

"It is expensive, a feature more accessible to enterprise class customers, but provides an enhanced possibility that Zero- or near-Zero-day threats may be identified and mitigated. The cost of the product weighed against the potential impact of even one successful crypto malware-type exploit may justify the expense."

"Palo Alto Networks WildFire is quite expensive, and this is what puts people off."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten since it can be pretty expensive."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire pricing and cost advice

"Our licensing fees for this solution are approximately one million dollars per year."

"The product is expensive, but it is better than the rest of them in the industry."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user206346

Security Consultant at Webernetz.net - Network Security Consulting

Mar 11, 2015

Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto Networks

Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto: Management Goodies You often have comparisons of both firewalls concerning security components. Of course, a firewall must block attacks, scan for viruses, build VPNs, etc. However, in this post I am discussing the advantages and disadvantages from both vendors concerning…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How does Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall compare with Palo Alto Networks Wildfire?

The Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall is a very powerful and very complex piece of anti-viral software. When one considers that fact, it is all the more impressive that the setup is a fairly straightf...

Which is better - Wildfire or FortiGate?

FortiGate has a lot going for it and I consider it to be the best, most user-friendly firewall out there. What I like the most about it is that it has an attractive web dashboard with very easy nav...

How does Cisco ASA Firewall compare with Palo Alto's WildFire?

When looking to change our ASA Firewall, we looked into Palo Alto’s WildFire. It works especially in preventing advanced malware and zero-day exploits with real-time intelligence. The sandbox featu...

What needs improvement with McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

I would like to see an API interface for internal email and control of outgoing email to make it closer to 10. It's necessary; today we have an MX interface, and it would be interesting to have an ...

What is your primary use case for McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

We are working with Palo Alto products, specifically firewalls. We are only using Palo Alto Firewalls and not Cortex. With FireEye and Trellix, we only work with ETP now because the NDR function wh...

What advice do you have for others considering McAfee Advanced Threat Defense?

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 7% of the time

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 6% of the time

VMware vDefend Advanced Threat Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 3% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 11% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 10% of the time

Check Point Infinity vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 9% of the time

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Advanced Threat Defense Competitors

Product Reports

Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Download Palo Alto Networks WildFire product report

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense

Download Trellix Advanced Threat Defense product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Advanced Threat Defense

Overview

Palo Alto Networks WildFire provides robust threat prevention with emphasis on automated malware detection and real-time security updates. Seamless integration and intuitive deployment enhance its ability to protect environments effectively, addressing advanced threat scenarios.

Palo Alto Networks WildFire is recognized for its threat detection capabilities, offering automated analysis of emails and effective malware response. The integration with Palo Alto's ecosystem ensures users benefit from seamless operations while safeguarding on-premise and cloud infrastructures. It supports VPN, URL filtering, and user identification with a focus on reducing manual intervention. Users note its complexity and high pricing but appreciate the efficient deployment once configured. Integration with third-party systems requires attention, but it remains vital for those requiring advanced network security measures.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks WildFire?

Threat Prevention: Detects and mitigates malware threats in real-time.
Automated Analysis: Analyzes potential threats in emails swiftly and accurately.
Sandboxing: Provides a controlled environment to test unknown files safely.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly within the Palo Alto ecosystem.
Real-Time Updates: Delivers effective threat intelligence continuously.

What benefits should users consider for ROI?

Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup processes, minimizing time spent on installation.
Network Security: Enhances protection and reduces vulnerabilities effectively.
Operational Efficiency: Limits manual processes, allowing for focus on critical tasks.
Comprehensive Intelligence: Offers detailed insights into threat activities swiftly.

Industries like banking leverage Palo Alto Networks WildFire for securing infrastructure against zero-day threats and cyber-attacks. It is widely used for scanning files and emails, ensuring malicious activity is prevented. Integrated with firewalls, WildFire strengthens cybersecurity frameworks, protecting organizations from evolving security challenges.

Palo Alto Networks

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense offers efficient threat detection and automatic threat remediation, featuring seamless management and integration with operating systems and extensions.

Providing robust malware defense, Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is easy to set up and use. Its components work collaboratively, with standout features like behavioral analysis, retro-inspection, and ePolicy Orchestration. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in Active Directory integration, cloud readiness, artificial intelligence, and faster sandboxing. The API interface and scalability need enhancement, while better compatibility with platforms like Cisco could elevate its function. Effective for server and endpoint security, it effectively blocks threats like WannaCry and disperses attack data through the DXL client quickly.

What are the notable features of Trellix Advanced Threat Defense?

Management and Automatic Threat Remediation: Facilitates seamless management and handling of threats.
Effective Threat Detection and Response: Delivers efficient and reliable threat detection capabilities.
Behavioral Analysis and Retro-Inspection: Offers advanced analysis for comprehensive threat identification.
ePolicy Orchestration: Streamlines processes for enhanced threat management.
Scalability and Price: Provides a stable and scalable solution at a competitive price point.

What key benefits can be identified from reviews?

Ease of Use and Setup: Known for its straightforward implementation and user-friendly interface.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with different operating systems and technologies like Palo Alto firewalls.
Threat Protection Efficiency: Proven effectiveness in stopping threats such as WannaCry.
Rapid Attack Information Dissemination: Utilizes the DXL client for quick data sharing.

Trellix Advanced Threat Defense is widely used across numerous industries for server and desktop protection, ensuring endpoint security and halting attacks without failure. Its integration with diverse technologies enhances protection in varied environments, making it a valuable tool in enterprise security management.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation

The Radicati Group, Florida International University, MGM Resorts International, County Durham andDarlington NHS Foundation Trust

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs. Trellix Advanced Threat Defense