No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

F-Secure Total vs MetaDefender comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

F-Secure Total
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
20th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Office 365 Protection (9th)
MetaDefender
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (18th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (7th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of F-Secure Total is 2.3%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MetaDefender is 2.2%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Anti-Malware Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
MetaDefender2.2%
F-Secure Total2.3%
Other95.5%
Anti-Malware Tools
 

Featured Reviews

MS
Computer Scientist at Comune di Eraclea
Easy to setup and stable solution
It's a good product for us. The reports and notifications are very good for us.  There is room for improvement in pricing.  In future releases, I would like to see improvements in EDR protection.  So, the only thing that I would like to see in the future is EDR protection and a lower price for…
RS
Senior Associate at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
File protection has improved and now keeps millions of daily transfers secure and compliant
In my organization, while using this tool, we found that there were a few files flagged as suspicious; however, those were not suspicious and it was a false positive, so that can be improved. False positive results were an issue, and it took time to scan files if the file size was greater than 1 GB. For larger files greater than 1 GB, it needs to be improved. In some cases, the reconstruction of the file led to a failure of code deployment and it flagged a valid file as malicious, which was not effective; however, in other types of files, it was very effective and could scan files properly. We have already covered all the main suggestions; however, it can be improved to reduce false positive results, and scanning could be faster to process more files in a day.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's a good product for us. The reports and notifications are very good for us."
"The percentage of accuracy is great and the integration of multi-scanning and Content Disarm and Reconstruction affects my data security operations effectively because OPSWAT blocks the file types that we are not willing to have inside the company or are not approved."
"I assess the effectiveness of MetaDefender in blocking or sanitizing content based on policy as very good."
"MetaDefender is a useful tool for scanning all incoming and outgoing files and keeping our applications and servers in compliance, and I found it useful because we can integrate it with multiple file transfer tools such as Globalscape EFT, GoAnywhere, or Sterling, which is the best feature as it integrates with multiple tools."
"The best feature of MetaDefender is that it can isolate USB devices from the connected network, blocks malware and unsafe files, and ensures all endpoints follow security policy, so that my organization remains safe and reduces the risk of these threats."
"OPSWAT is the best alternative."
"For one of my clients, a major bank in Turkey, they reported saving approximately 30 percent of their SOC time on analyzing emails since implementing MetaDefender."
"MetaDefender is flexible because, for a free product, you can enroll up to 50 devices, and I have only used about eight devices so far."
"I like the simplicity, the way it works out of the box. It's pretty easy to run and configure. The integration of the network devices with the ICAP server was easily done."
 

Cons

"I would like to see in the future is EDR protection and a lower price for F-Secure Total."
"I did not manage to enroll my IoT devices, including my child's device running on iOS and some Amazon products."
"In some cases, the reconstruction of the file led to a failure of code deployment and it flagged a valid file as malicious, which was not effective."
"While MetaDefender's mail gateway already gives fewer false positives, there is still room for improvement in reducing those even further."
"Some capabilities are lacking in reporting because we do not have full statistics that are easy for users to understand."
"Most of the time, in our experience at Danet Communications, we work with government offices, and they need the CDR. However, because CDR is affecting files such as MSI and EXE files, they are always creating new passes of scanning."
"In some cases, the reconstruction of the file led to a failure of code deployment and it flagged a valid file as malicious, which was not effective; however, in other types of files, it was very effective and could scan files properly."
"What I would like to see improved in MetaDefender includes reducing the high cost of the license, as the pricing is very high."
"The documentation is not well written, and I often need to talk with support."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We can easily scale and improve security, but the cost is high for us."
"We bought a three-year license, and that was pretty expensive. We agreed that it was really worth buying. It could be cheaper, but we understand that quality comes at a price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
26%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MetaDefender?
I am not much aware of the pricing and licensing of MetaDefender. I know that the SaaS platform is very expensive, and we did it on the IaaS platform in Azure. So I am not very familiar, but becaus...
What needs improvement with MetaDefender?
MetaDefender could be improved in the future regarding the notification issue. OPSWAT delivers an API structure that you can query via APIs for a lot of data from OPSWAT. However, many customers, i...
What is your primary use case for MetaDefender?
I have been working with MetaDefender for the past year. I am a customer of MetaDefender. I use MetaDefender for CDR in an Azure Blob environment. The features of MetaDefender that I have found the...
 

Also Known As

F-Secure Elements for Microsoft 365
OPSWAT MetaDefender, MetaDefender Core
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: May 2026.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.