ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs Iris Session Analyzer comparison

ExtraHop Networks and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #15. ExtraHop Networks holds a 3.3% mindshare in NTA, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

327 Views
123 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Iris Session Analyzer

Read 2 Iris Session Analyzer reviews

146 Views
17 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Iris Session Analyzer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Iris Session Analyzer are both network security solutions. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is noted for its ease of deployment and customer service, while Iris Session Analyzer shines with superior features and better ROI despite higher initial costs.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is recognized for comprehensive network visibility, real-time threat detection, detailed insights, and automated responses for simplified network management. Iris Session Analyzer excels in advanced session reconstruction and packet-level analysis, offering deeper forensic capabilities and in-depth forensic analysis.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 needs better scalability and more granular control over network data. Iris Session Analyzer requires a more intuitive setup process and improved documentation. ExtraHop desires better scalability, while Iris users want an easier setup and better documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is praised for a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Iris Session Analyzer, though effective, has a steeper learning curve and less consistent customer support. ExtraHop's simpler deployment and better support are advantages.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers reasonable pricing with a fair ROI, though some users have concerns about long-term costs. Iris Session Analyzer, despite higher initial costs, is seen as a worthwhile investment due to its rich features and effective results, justifying the expense. Iris Session Analyzer provides substantial value for its price, favoring ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Iris Session Analyzer Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Iris Session Analyzer

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (18th), Container Security (28th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (26th)

Iris Session Analyzer

Ranking in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Iris Session Analyzer is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

Featured Reviews

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Muhammad Anas

Assistant Manager NOC and Infrastructure at NiFT

Provides a memory utilization graph and shows disk space and uplink utilization but could include smart navigation in next release

The solution is deployed on-premises. There are more than 20 people who use this solution in my organization. They're infrastructure engineers, network engineers, and information security engineers A great feature is the memory utilization graph. It shows utilization, disk space utilization,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is scalable."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"A great feature is the memory utilization graph."

"The feature that I have found the most useful is the decode of packets. It gives us a variety of information that helps us in figuring out what to look at. The networks are getting really complex, and without the information that we get from Iris Session Analyzer, we couldn't do our job. Its graphical user interface is also very easy to use and intuitive."

Cons

"There needs to be more support."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"Sometimes the network analyzer will show that a server is down when it's actually working."

"They can increase flexibility in the search engine. Basically, I go with the information I have at the time. If I could just type in the parameter that I want to search for and its value, it might be easier than having to do the groundwork upfront before I can get my traces."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

"I don't know what the cost to buy the solution was, but I doubt if it's a significant part of the budget as far as the maintenance and support are concerned."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Comms Service Provider

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 30% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 18% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 18% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 14% of the time

Forescout Platform vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 12% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

May 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

May 2025

Download Iris Session Analyzer product report

Also Known As

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

No data available

Overview

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Iris Session Analyzer (ISA) uncovers and analyzes the specific calls and sessions that fail to deliver required performance.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Wizards of the Coast

xtel communications, banco votorantim, petronas

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Iris Session Analyzer

June 2025

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Iris Session Analyzer

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Iris Session Analyzer and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 vs. Iris Session Analyzer report.

See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.

We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.