Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Exoscale Object Storage vs XSKY XEOS comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Pure Storage FlashBlade
Sponsored
Ranking in File and Object Storage
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (12th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (8th)
Exoscale Object Storage
Ranking in File and Object Storage
48th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
XSKY XEOS
Ranking in File and Object Storage
37th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the File and Object Storage category, the mindshare of Pure Storage FlashBlade is 5.3%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Exoscale Object Storage is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of XSKY XEOS is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
File and Object Storage Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Pure Storage FlashBlade5.3%
XSKY XEOS0.3%
Exoscale Object Storage0.3%
Other94.1%
File and Object Storage
 

Featured Reviews

MikaelHellström - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Regin Dalarna
Has handled backup storage needs reliably and supports seamless upgrades
In environments requiring high throughput and low latency, Pure Storage FlashBlade provides high throughput and normal latency, but we do not have any application that requires low latency right now, so the latency of three to five milliseconds is considered kind of high. Pure Storage FlashBlade's ability to integrate with enterprise applications is not important for us, as we only want to present an S3 bucket for our backup, which we have done, and it works very fast. We use the Purity software's data reduction techniques; we have a backup software that compresses everything before sending it to the S3 bucket, achieving a data reduction of 1.1 to one. I would recommend Pure Storage FlashBlade to other companies because it's a very fast and scalable solution for anyone who needs it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution an 8.
Use Exoscale Object Storage?
Leave a review
Use XSKY XEOS?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
7%
No data available
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise21
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure Storage FlashBlade?
The tool's most valuable feature is its fast performance, especially in handling snapshots. It helps during power out...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashBlade?
Regarding pricing, it is okay; we needed exactly this in size, and the price was a lot lower than competitors, making...
What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashBlade?
In my opinion, one way Pure Storage FlashBlade can be improved is by having more compatibility between the FlashArray...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ServiceNow, Mercedes-AMG Petronas Motorsport, Dominos, Man AHL
1. Acme Corporation 2. Amazon 3. Apple Inc 4. ATT 5. Bayer AG 6. BNP Paribas 7. Cisco Systems 8. Coca-Cola Company 9. Dell Technologies 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Eni SpA 12. Ericsson 13. Facebook 14. Ford Motor Company 15. Google 16. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 17. Honeywell International 18. IBM 19. Intel Corporation 20. Johnson & Johnson 21. JPMorgan Chase Co 22. Koninklijke Philips NV 23.L'Oreal 24. Lufthansa Group 25. Merck Co Inc 26. Microsoft 27. Nestle 28. Nike 29. Oracle Corporation 30. Panasonic Corporation 31. SAP 32. Siemens AG
1. Alibaba 2. Baidu 3. ByteDance 4. Ctrip 5. Didi Chuxing 6. JD.com 7. Kuaishou 8. Meituan 9. NetEase 10. Pony.ai 11. Tencent 12. Tianjin University 13. Tongji University 14. University of Science and Technology of China 15. Yandex 16. Zoom 17. Zhejiang University 18. Zhongguancun Software Park 19. China Mobile 20. China Unicom 21. China Telecom 22. CITIC Securities 23. ICBC 24. Ping An Insurance 25. State Grid 26. Tencent Cloud 27. Alibaba Cloud 28. Baidu Cloud 28. JD.com Cloud 29. Kuaishou Cloud 30. Meituan Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Dell Technologies, Nutanix and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: December 2025.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.