Everest Blueriq vs IBM Case Foundation comparison

Everest and IBM are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Everest is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.0. Everest holds a 0.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to IBM’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Everest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Everest Blueriq

Read 2 Everest Blueriq reviews

206 Views
131 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Case Foundation

Read 13 IBM Case Foundation reviews

298 Views
204 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Everest Blueriq

IBM Case Foundation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Everest Blueriq and IBM Case Foundation are competing products in the case management solutions category. IBM Case Foundation seems to have an edge due to its comprehensive features, making it a valuable investment despite Blueriq's favorable pricing and support.

Features: Everest Blueriq is recognized for flexibility and customization, catering to businesses needing tailored solutions. It offers a collaborative platform for rapid deployment and adjustment. IBM Case Foundation provides robust document and workflow management capabilities, scalability, and integration with IBM solutions. The difference lies in Blueriq's agility compared to IBM's extensive feature set.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Everest Blueriq features a straightforward deployment model and responsive customer service, suitable for quick, hassle-free setup. IBM Case Foundation requires understanding of its extensive functionalities but accompanies solid support and guidance, suitable for organizations with strong IT infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Everest Blueriq offers a more affordable setup cost, appealing for businesses focusing on initial expenditures, with substantial ROI through adaptable service. IBM Case Foundation, though higher in initial cost, offers expansive capabilities and potential high return over time, beneficial for large-scale enterprises valuing comprehensive control and integration. The choice depends on immediate cost-efficiency versus long-term investment in versatile features.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Everest Blueriq

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Case Foundation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Everest Blueriq is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Case Foundation is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

ChrisBiemans

Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.

Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities

We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…

Read full review

Nouman Nawaz

Deputy Director - IT(Plans) at DHA Lahore

Mature product in terms of security and stable product

The architecture is a bit difficult, but in BAW, they introduced the Business Automation Workflow. It's a bit easier compared to Case Manager. Currently, we use Case Manager, so it's a bit difficult to upgrade and handle, but BAW is comparatively much better and easier to handle. The limitation is only for customization because IBM doesn't support it. In some scenarios, if you want some business processes to be customized, we have already spoken two or three times with IBM representatives that we have to customize some of the features in this business process. They would say that if you want to do this automation at your own end, then okay, fine, go ahead, but we are not supporting all this customization. The only thing is the customization because it's a complete standard application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."

"It provides us the capability of producing business processes for documents that are launched immediately when a document comes into the repository."

"It is easy to set up workflows that notify the user depending on certain events."

"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."

"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."

"The content management is great."

"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."

More IBM Case Foundation pros

Cons

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."

"We are now using microservices but there are some areas where the coordination with FileNet is problematic."

"There are some features that could be enhanced like the document viewer"

"The solution can be quite expensive."

"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."

"The cloud version could use more stability."

"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."

"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."

"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."

More IBM Case Foundation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."

"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."

"The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."

"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

20%

Insurance Company

12%

University

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Everest Blueriq?

The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Everest Blueriq?

The platform's initial setup process could be better.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Everest Blueriq?

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Case Foundation?

A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Case Foundation?

It was affordable, but right now, ten years later, the cost of the product is extremely high. That's why we are looking for another product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Case Foundation?

See all answers

Comparisons

Pega Platform vs Everest Blueriq

Compared 100% of the time

More Everest Blueriq Competitors

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Case Foundation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Everest Blueriq product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Case Foundation

April 2025

Download IBM Case Foundation product report

Also Known As

Blueriq, Aquima

Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager

Overview

Blueriq is the software platform for organizations with knowledge-based, rule-driven business processes. By modeling these processes in one central area, automate and integrate, you can respond quickly to changes, creating the ultimate customer experience and streamline your services.

Everest

IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.

IBM

Sample Customers

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg

Suncorp Group Limited

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Automation Anywhere and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.