ENEA Polyhedra vs FoxPro comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
ENEA Logo
59 views|39 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
400 views|146 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Ranking
15th
Views
59
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
2nd
Views
400
Comparisons
146
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Polyhedra
Learn More
Overview
Polyhedra is a family of compact, lightweight, SQL relational database management systems (RDBMS) optimized for embedded systems applications. Built on an ironclad clientserver architecture, Polyhedra in-memory database system (IMDB) and Polyhedra FlashLite provide a secure data repository for embedded systems, mobile devices and server-based applications demanding the utmost in performance and reliability.
Visual FoxPro is the object-oriented relational database management system that makes it possible for you to create database solutions for the desktop to the Web. Visual FoxPro provides powerful data handling capabilities, rapid application development tools for maximum productivity, and the flexibility needed to build all types of database solutions.
Sample Customers
Xilinx, Freescale Semiconductor, AMD
Vocational Training Council, Advantage Sales and Marketing, Capital Nomura Securities Public Company Limited, King Saud University

ENEA Polyhedra is ranked 15th in Non-Relational Databases while FoxPro is ranked 2nd in Non-Relational Databases. ENEA Polyhedra is rated 0.0, while FoxPro is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of FoxPro writes "FoxPro software development system is used in designing sophisticated database applications". ENEA Polyhedra is most compared with , whereas FoxPro is most compared with Oracle Berkeley DB and FileMaker.

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.