Elixir Tango vs THREADS comparison

Elixir and THREADS are both solutions in the Customer Communications Management (CCM) category. Elixir is ranked #12, while THREADS is ranked #26. Elixir holds a 1.8% mindshare in CCM, compared to THREADS’s 0.0% mindshare.

Elixir Tango

190 Views
113 Comparison Views

THREADS

41 Views
2 Comparison Views

Elixir Tango

THREADS

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elixir Tango

Ranking in Customer Communications Management (CCM)

12th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

THREADS

Ranking in Customer Communications Management (CCM)

26th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Customer Communications Management (CCM) category, the mindshare of Elixir Tango is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of THREADS is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Communications Management (CCM)

Comparisons

Quadient Inspire vs Elixir Tango

Compared 57% of the time

OpenText Communications vs Elixir Tango

Compared 43% of the time

More Elixir Tango Competitors

No data available

Also Known As

Tango

No data available

Overview

Equipment and Condition management application. Features: Inventory control, History, Condition monitoring, and more.

Elixir

Threads empowers teams to easily share, discuss, and make decisions no matter where they are.

THREADS

Sample Customers

Bradford Group

BUFFER, BREX, The Atlantic, Whisper, Bitwise, Aspire

See our list of best Customer Communications Management (CCM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Communications Management (CCM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.