Elastic Path vs SAP Commerce Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Path
Ranking in eCommerce Platforms
9th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAP Commerce Cloud
Ranking in eCommerce Platforms
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2024, in the eCommerce Platforms category, the mindshare of Elastic Path is 2.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Commerce Cloud is 17.7%, down from 20.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eCommerce Platforms
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

JG
Jun 26, 2023
Provides flexible infrastructure and has good stability
I use the solution to create a B2B e-commerce platform The solution provided a flexible infrastructure with ease of use for creating a proposal for the company. The solution's most valuable feature is the ability to create a B2B platform. It has all the essential features, including payment…
Ankit Bhagat - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 24, 2023
A scalable tool that can be integrated with any platform
The product's setup is not a big issue. I would rate the product's setup an eight out of ten. The time taken for deployment depends from project to project. I have worked on projects which completed deployment in three to six months and others where the process took a year to complete. We follow the agile methodology for the tool's deployment. We conduct the unit testing, and IT testing and then release the solution to our platform. You need a 25-30 member team to manage the deployment process which can include business analysts, project managers, front-end and back-end developers, and QAs. Four to five technical staff is required for the product's maintenance. This technical staff team analyzes issues and asks the developers to fix them. The issues get fixed and implemented in the solution's next release.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."
"SAP Hybris Commerce is a very advanced e-commerce platform compared to other platforms such as WebSphere Commerce, Oracle Commerce, and others."
"If you have a client and they want to have an e-commerce project that is based on solid principles, you don't need too much time to develop it."
"Hybris Commerce's most valuable feature is the simple integration with ERP."
"The tool has good performance."
"It's the best tool on the market and is a complete e-commerce system for product management. For instance, if the customer has a log enterprise level product, they can manage it here."
"The simple steps for configuring your checkout processes, as well as the promotional engine, are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The tool supports multiple currencies."
"SAP Hybris provides us with all of the e-commerce features that a client could need."
 

Cons

"They should provide integration with social networking sites."
"The support team should improve the response time."
"They could include additional types of payment implementations. Right now they are just providing CyberSourse."
"They have just started to work with the cloud, but they only support Microsoft Azure."
"It is very expensive to implement, which is why many companies who can't afford would normally move to Salesforce or Magento."
"SAP Commerce needs to have a credit limit like Salesforce. Currently, we have to do the coding and customization and then showcase it to the user."
"The learning curve is high."
"The solution is complex due to the rapid development of new features in SAP Commerce, which requires the changing of older technologies and migration to new ones."
"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the product search. There will be multiple criteria to search products and there will be a number of products in different categories. The question is how soon can I find the product which I'm looking for. The search can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."
"SAP Hybris is expensive, which is why only the large clients use it. At the same time, I think that the return on investment warrants it."
"The price is too high."
"This is an expensive solution."
"The product is expensive. I would rate its price a seven out of ten. The solution's licensing is yearly."
"The solution is expensive."
"The price is quite high."
"The solution is very expensive in Turkey."
"I don't know the cost, but it can be expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eCommerce Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
789,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user9726 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 5, 2013
WCS vs Hybris vs ATG - Feature Smackdown
They say "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder", so if you are a purist in one of these technologies you would probably never agree to my comparison matrix, However these are my personal opinion, From my experience standpoint I have longest exposure to WCS Commerce Suite and the least with ATG…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
44%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Elastic Path?
They should include information on modular infrastructure for the solution and provide integration with social networking sites in the next release.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SAP Hybris Commerce, Hybris
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Garmin, TimeInc, Agfa, LVMH, Virgin Media, TeliaSonera, Western Union, LifeWay, Kiabi, TIBCO
NHS 24
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, SAP, Adobe and others in eCommerce Platforms. Updated: June 2024.
789,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.