Elastic Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

Elastic and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Elastic is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1, while IBM is ranked #60. Elastic holds a 4.6% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 27 Elastic Observability reviews

9,965 Views
8,769 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

554 Views
515 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Elastic Observability both compete in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management category. IBM Tivoli has the upper hand in customer support and feature comprehensiveness, while Elastic Observability is preferred for its user-friendly and modern interface.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager provides detailed monitoring, powerful analytics capabilities, and extensive customer support. Elastic Observability offers seamless integration, real-time data analysis, and a modern, user-friendly interface.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager needs enhancements in usability, performance troubleshooting capabilities, and large-scale environment support. Elastic Observability requires improved documentation, support for large environments, and better customer support feedback.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is known for robust deployment options and superior customer service, though it has a steeper learning curve. Elastic Observability provides easier deployment, quicker setup times, but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher upfront costs but offers a solid return on investment due to its extensive features. Elastic Observability is initially more cost-effective, with competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI for smaller-scale deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (11th), Log Management (16th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th)

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

60th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 4.6%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Adelina Craciun

Product Owner at Swisscom

Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments

The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.

Read full review

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good design and easy to use once implemented."

"I think Elastic Observability is already in very good shape."

"The solution allows us to dig deep into data."

"All the features that we use, such as monitoring, dashboarding, reporting, the possibility of alerting, and the way we index the data, are important."

"I recommend Elastic Observability for its completeness of vision and wide ecosystem."

"It is very stable, and I would rate it ten out of ten based on my interaction with it."

"It is a powerful tool that allows users to collect and transform logs as needed, enabling flexible visualization and analysis."

"The solution has been stable in our usage."

More Elastic Observability pros

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

Cons

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."

"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."

"More web features could be added to the product."

"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."

"The cost must be made more transparent."

"Improving code insight related to infrastructure and network, particularly focusing on aspects such as firewalls, switches, routers, and testing would be beneficial."

"Elastic Observability could improve asset discovery as the current requirement to push the agent is not ideal."

More Elastic Observability cons

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

"The user interface was not good."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have been using the open-source version."

"The product is not that cheap."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

30%

Government

11%

Healthcare Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The license for Elastic Observability is the same as for other uses; you pay for Elastic, and you can use it for various cases. Observability is actually cheaper compared to logs because you're not...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

I think they are working on the AI-based features, which are currently in technical preview. The only challenging aspect for new users is often writing the query language. Basic searching is very e...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 13% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 12% of the time

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Elastic Observability

Compared 7% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 32% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 22% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 12% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

August 2025

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Overview

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?

Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?

Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Michelin Tire Corp

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

July 2025

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.