Eggplant Test vs OpenText Business Processing Testing comparison

The compared Keysight Technologies and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 in TAt , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 3.8% mindshare in the category. OpenText is ranked #39 in FT , and holds a 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 18 Eggplant Test reviews

2,718 Views
1,530 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

126 Views
52 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

OpenText Business Processin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Eggplant Test and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

OpenText Business Processin...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (39th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Eggplant Test is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 3.8%, up 3.2% compared to last year.
OpenText Business Processing Testing, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 0.1% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.

Test Automation Tools

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Tayyaba Noreen

Student at SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY

Empowers effective test automation with comprehensive platform coverage and scalability

There was no free trial in it. So, I studied it through a page that tells how it works. It will be good if a free trial is provided for users. Moreover, I would like to give some feedback on the installation process. There are other tools that are much easier to install and get started with. Eggplant could improve its installation process.

Read full review

it_user309363

Regional Infrastructure Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

We use UFT for the scalability and cross-technology diversity, UFT API for the web-service and database related testing, and HP BPT for the modular testing.

We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps. BPT allows you to manage all the test resources and artifacts inside of Quality Center, including all data and test flows, and to have a single point for reporting. To give you an example, we built a series of tests that would firstly fire off web-service calls to ensure the required services were running. We would then do data creation using a series of Excel VB functions (called by UFT through BPT), and then launch into GUI testing of complex webmethods Java web portals to take a business process through a series of screens, capture required data and test screen functionality, write all runtime data back to QC datasets, then call the data later in the BPT test to validate it across database checks using HP UFT API, build and execute SQL queries, and finally validate information for accounting purposes of data sitting on AS400 or payment databases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"The solution is a stable one."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"The most valuable features would be the image recognition and the OCR."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

More Eggplant Test pros

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

Cons

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"The solution would crash from time to time."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"There was no free trial in it."

More Eggplant Test cons

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

10%

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Eggplant Manager?

The solution is a stable one.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 22% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 16% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 10% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

April 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

April 2025

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

OpenText Business Processing Testing (BPT) test framework software will help you move from one-off manual testing and ad hoc functional automated testing to an architected approach with a library of reusable test components. BPT accelerates the move to component-based testing with an integrated test framework approach to creating a repository of reusable test modules that allow for changes to be made once, then propagated across your distributed agile teams to all affected tests.

OpenText

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Migros Bank AG

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

April 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing report.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.