

Nexthink and Eggplant Test are advanced solutions competing in the IT operations and testing category. Nexthink appears to have an upper hand in user data analytics and user experience improvement, providing value through automation and integration capabilities, whereas Eggplant Test excels in testing automation with AI-driven stability and performance.
Features: Nexthink offers a robust event repository for extensive investigations, enhances user experience through digital experience scoring, and aids remote actions with integration tools. Eggplant Test provides strong OCR and automation capabilities, features a versatile scripting language SenseTalk, and enables cross-platform testing with high adaptability for complex scenarios.
Room for Improvement: Nexthink could improve by expanding non-Windows platform support, enhancing integration with other ITSM tools, and improving alerting mechanisms. Eggplant Test can enhance data management, streamline setup processes, and expand language support beyond its proprietary language for better usability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer deployment options on-premises and in public or private clouds. Nexthink receives positive feedback for customer support, though some note responsiveness issues with first-line support. Eggplant Test is praised for knowledgeable and quick support services.
Pricing and ROI: Nexthink is deemed cost-effective, offering broad functionalities and improving ROI by efficiently resolving IT issues. Its licensing cost varies, but its capabilities justify the investment for large deployments. Eggplant Test, although more expensive, is favored by larger enterprises for its comprehensive testing approach and includes extensive support in its pricing, providing significant value by reducing testing times.
Over a year, we have saved more than 2 lakh dollars.
Nexthink enabled our current support staff to become super users and they have really helped us to expand on our financials.
I definitely see a return on investment with Nexthink as it helps in the reduction of incidents, thus saving manpower.
Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.
I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.
Customer support is one thing which needs to be improved; support team members are slow to respond, and they take a lot of time to get back to us, even if it is an urgent case.
There is also a community available for inquiries.
They respond instantly whenever we have issues with remote actions or workflows.
I am able to use Investigations and NQL to analyze data across devices and identify trends or issues affecting groups of users.
Nexthink's scalability is sufficient; it is scalable enough for wider organizations.
It has the capability to manage an increased number of end-user devices, and we can still scale up without encountering issues.
There are no performance or scalability issues.
Nexthink is very stable; we have not faced any downtime with the products that we are using.
Upgrading the agent is much smoother than I thought and smoother than with other agents we have used before.
For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.
The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.
Improving automation and self-healing capabilities would also make a significant impact, as reducing helpdesk tickets with automated fixes is crucial.
The structure of the data, particularly regarding raw data or outputs and binaries, requires improvement as it is not very clean and demands significant manual effort to sort.
The UI is hierarchical, which makes navigation complex and isn't user-friendly for those unfamiliar with it.
Nexthink is about 10% more expensive than SysTrack.
Pricing is competitive, and the licensing model is straightforward.
I believe the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Nexthink are reasonable according to the current market prices.
It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.
It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.
The platform is beneficial as it provides data in real time, whereas alternatives may provide up to twenty-four-hour-old data.
The most valuable feature of Nexthink is its proactive issue identification, which is part of its unique selling proposition.
Similar to Wireshark, it captures packets, but Nexthink gives me an overview of the whole traffic from the user to the end in the outside network.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Nexthink | 12.8% |
| Eggplant Test | 1.8% |
| Other | 85.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
Eggplant Test stands out with its AI-driven and image recognition features, facilitating quick bug detection across multiple systems. Its ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes it a top choice for efficient and comprehensive testing solutions.
Offering OCR, image recognition, and extensive AI capabilities, Eggplant Test enhances automation and reduces testing time. Known for its versatility, it operates independently from system constraints and supports scriptless testing. With a user-centric design, the tool integrates with platforms like GitHub and operates on diverse operating systems. Despite advancements, considerations include its affordability, installation complexities, and need for better text recognition and stability. Its success is bolstered by seamless scripting, robust reporting features, and the option for digital twin utilization, making it ideal for real-world user action simulations.
What are the most important features of Eggplant Test?Industries utilize Eggplant Test primarily for regression and GUI automation testing, especially in desktop applications. Its capacity for post-development validation and vulnerability scanning supports businesses with testers having minimal coding experience. Deployed on virtual machines, it effectively tests web pages, Windows apps, and streaming devices, simulating real-world user actions efficiently. Eggplant Test's role in simplifying robotic process automation and functional testing is significant, offering a spectrum of operational support across varied sectors.
Nexthink offers real-time digital experience management with features like live dashboards, remote actions, and AI-driven insights, aimed at improving user engagement and IT infrastructure management.
Nexthink caters to organizations seeking to enhance digital experiences by offering dynamic campaigns, comprehensive reporting, and seamless ServiceNow integration. Its AI Assistant, device monitoring, and automation features support efficient decision-making and rapid issue resolution. While offering real-time analytics and proactive troubleshooting, Nexthink users have identified areas for improvement, such as enhancing query language flexibility and third-party integrations. They seek better automation, customer support, and pricing strategies to optimize Nexthink's potential. Enhanced monitoring and integration capabilities are also desired to bolster IT productivity and infrastructure management.
What are the key features of Nexthink?Organizations in sectors like IT services, finance, and healthcare leverage Nexthink for digital experience improvement, endpoint monitoring, and automated incident resolution. They employ its real-time analytics for compliance and security management and utilize its automation capabilities to ensure seamless IT service management and employee productivity enhancement.
We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.