Eggplant Test vs IBM DevOps Test UI comparison

Keysight Technologies and IBM are both solutions in the Regression Testing Tools category. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,466 Views
2,253 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

655 Views
406 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

IBM DevOps Test UI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Eggplant Test and IBM DevOps Test UI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. IBM DevOps Test UI Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. IBM DevOps Test UI

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

IBM DevOps Test UI

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (29th), Regression Testing Tools (13th)

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

"The best feature of Eggplant Test is that it's very easy to use; you just capture those pictures of the objects in your application and it's easy to automate."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool. The tool works as expected, and the support response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

"Good text reading ability."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

More Eggplant Test pros

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

Cons

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"The solution would crash from time to time."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"It has low productivity."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"There was no free trial in it."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

More Eggplant Test cons

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

21%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 13% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 23% of the time

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 21% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 13% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

October 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

September 2025

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

IBM Rational Functional Tester

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

IBM

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Edumate

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. IBM DevOps Test UI

September 2025

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. IBM DevOps Test UI

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. IBM DevOps Test UI and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. IBM DevOps Test UI report.

See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.