DX NetOps vs Icinga comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Icinga are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #33 with an average rating of 9.0, while Icinga is ranked #44. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Icinga’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Icinga users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

3,875 Views
3,333 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,834 Views
5,719 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Icinga

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Icinga and DX NetOps are competing products in the IT monitoring and network management sphere. DX NetOps seems to have the upper hand with its advanced feature set that supports complex network environments, despite Icinga offering a flexible and low-cost solution.

Features: Icinga is recognized for its modular design, enabling scalability and flexibility across varying IT environments. It supports extensive plugin and integration options tailored for specific monitoring needs. Its versatile architecture is suited for small to large-scale operations. DX NetOps, on the other hand, provides comprehensive network visibility, integrating performance analytics for real-time insights. It caters particularly well to complex enterprise network infrastructures with its rich set of features. It also includes sophisticated analytics that drive deep insights into network performance.

Room for Improvement: Icinga could enhance its feature set to better compete with enterprise-level applications by implementing advanced analytics tools. Its user interface could use refinement, aiming for enhanced user experience. Improving corporate-level support options could also widen its appeal. DX NetOps might benefit from reducing its initial complexities that can be challenging for new users. Lowering the initial cost could make it more accessible to smaller businesses. Offering a more adaptable deployment model could cater to organizations with unique infrastructures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Icinga allows straightforward deployment options that can be adapted to various models, supported by a community-driven approach. Its emphasis on simplicity makes it favorable for a wide user base. DX NetOps presents a more structured deployment process with professional support fitting for large enterprises. Its robust customer service framework supports scalability, making it suitable for expansive and intricate infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Icinga is noted for low initial setup costs, offering a compelling ROI with minimal financial exposure, appealing to smaller businesses seeking budget-friendly solutions. DX NetOps, on the other hand, requires a higher upfront investment but is justified through its high-level analytics and comprehensive functionalities, ensuring a strong ROI potential over time. The depth of features supports its value, promising long-term benefits for enterprises prepared to invest initially.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Icinga Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Icinga

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

33rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (19th)

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (50th), Cloud Monitoring Software (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Icinga	1.1%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable."

"Real-time insights through DX NetOps benefit diagnosing and resolving network issues since Spectrum has all sorts of details, but it lacks dashboards and a readable tabular format."

"A highly scalable solution."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

More DX NetOps pros

"Icinga does the job and is fairly stable."

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

"An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"Icinga has multiple automation and integration features. There is an API for everything and a web UI for configurations. The APIs enable you to automate tasks in Icinga. We can also use plugins to talk to the API. The Icinga Director talks to a database in the background, and you can import settings from the CMDB to all systems in Icinga."

"If you have a small infrastructure or a small number of devices that you want to monitor, then I think it's a good solution."

"I would recommend Icinga; it's an open-source solution, it's quite easy and simple to use, and checks can be run with Python code and Shell Script code."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

More DX NetOps cons

"Scalability is problematic. If you have a stable environment it's good, but if the environment is growing, I had some problems with Icinga."

"Icinga is a complex solution that's hard to learn. It's a powerful product for monitoring, but new users will have a hard time figuring out what to do."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."

"In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI."

"The installation and configuration are very complex."

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution is free to use."

"The solution is cheap."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

13%

University

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

October 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

September 2026

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

No data available

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

DX NetOps offers robust network monitoring capabilities along with AI-driven automation and predictive analytics, making it a valuable tool for ensuring network performance and reliability across hybrid environments.

DX NetOps is designed to provide comprehensive visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on root cause analysis, ease of setup, scalability, and stability. Its features allow for proactive issue identification through custom dashboards, while integration with IT systems ensures seamless connectivity. Performance management and insightful analytics enhance network visibility, aiding resource allocation in hybrid environments. Organizations utilize DX NetOps for monitoring, alerting, and analytics across network devices, benefiting from integration with platforms like ServiceNow.

What are the key features of DX NetOps?

Root Cause Analysis: Identifies network issues efficiently to minimize downtime.
Scalability: Supports expansive networks without compromising performance.
AI-Driven Automation: Streamlines network management tasks using artificial intelligence.
Predictive Analytics: Anticipates potential network problems, enabling proactive measures.
Topological Views: Provides visual insights into network structure and connectivity.
Custom Dashboards: Allows users to tailor views for specific monitoring and analysis needs.

What benefits or ROI should users anticipate?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Improved insights lead to better network performance management.
Proactive Issue Identification: Early detection of issues reduces downtime and service interruptions.
Improved Resource Allocation: Optimizes network resources across hybrid environments.
Seamless IT Integration: Ensures efficient workflows with other systems for better performance tracking.
Infrastructure Planning Support: Assists in preparing for peak periods with detailed analytics.

DX NetOps is widely implemented across telecommunications, financial services, and manufacturing industries. Organizations leverage its capabilities for monitoring extensive network infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance through integration with existing platforms and enhancing decision-making processes with detailed network analytics.

Broadcom

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Icinga

September 2026

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Icinga

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Icinga and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Icinga report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.