We performed a comparison between Cisco Duo and OneSpan DIGIPASS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."They are users who, as mentioned before, utilize RDPAP and MDPAP. It includes functionalities related to finance, specifically in single sign-on."
"Cisco is the perfect product for our current size, and I don't think we'll have problems with scalability as we grow."
"By deploying Duo, we have virtually eliminated the risk of direct deposit redirection as a result of credentials that have been compromised via phishing."
"The product is reliable and easy to use."
"It's a lot easier for our end users to connect to our network. You don't have to type in a code. You get push notifications, that's probably the best thing about it. The fewer clicks they have to do to be online, the better it is. They can easily get into the network and do remote work."
"The app has greater stability than rival solutions such as Google Authenticator, and Duo Push authentication is a valuable feature."
"For me and my customers, the best feature is that it's very easy to integrate with the existing infrastructure. It takes a few minutes to configure it."
"It's easy to deploy. It's easy to manage. It's easy to integrate with other applications."
"OneSpan Digipass is very useful, easy to use and work with."
"Certain customers can not use this product because it is cloud-based."
"Most of my colleagues from other companies use the Microsoft MFA solution because it's included in Office 365. Few people are considering Cisco Duo. That's the primary problem in our area. It's a solution mostly adopted by Cisco users."
"The dashboard needs to be improved."
"Integration between Duo Security and FTDs needs improvement. Integrating Next Generation Firewall safety with Duo Security currently requires a proxy agent between Active Directory and the appliance. It's an additional factor that we need to think about. It would be great to have direct integration with FTD so that we don't have to worry about middleware products. For the rest of the Cisco Secure solutions, the APIs need improvement."
"I would like to see some features simplified, such as securing, configuring, and implementing Microsoft Remote Desktop. Other than that, the solution was rock solid throughout my time administering it."
"While two-factor authentication with mobile devices provides a high level of security, it's still not foolproof, as someone could potentially steal your phone. It would be beneficial to have information about the authentication location."
"I would appreciate it if Duo Security could improve its integrations with Windows Hello."
"Duo Security should better organize its tile feature to organize applications better."
"At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code."
Earn 20 points
Cisco Duo is ranked 2nd in Authentication Systems with 55 reviews while OneSpan DIGIPASS is ranked 22nd in Authentication Systems. Cisco Duo is rated 8.8, while OneSpan DIGIPASS is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Duo writes "Helps reduce the risk of a breach and is easy to deploy and onboard". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneSpan DIGIPASS writes "Good authentication options, but the setup can be complex and the user interface should be improved". Cisco Duo is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Fortinet FortiToken, Yubico YubiKey and Entrust Identity Enterprise, whereas OneSpan DIGIPASS is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Yubico YubiKey, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, RSA SecurID and RSA Authentication Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
