No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dundas BI vs Logi Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dundas BI
Ranking in Embedded BI
15th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Data Visualization (30th)
Logi Analytics
Ranking in Embedded BI
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Embedded BI category, the mindshare of Dundas BI is 2.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logi Analytics is 2.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Embedded BI Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Logi Analytics2.3%
Dundas BI2.2%
Other95.5%
Embedded BI
 

Featured Reviews

Ishwar Saswade - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at Techknomatic Services Private Limited
Has a lot of integration and visualization options, but can't be easily used by business users, and working with the color palette is difficult
With Dundas BI, we do not have end-users apart from the developers. End-users do not find it easy to create their own reports. Most of the implementations I have seen require a developer team for creating the visuals, and they then give them to end-users. A self-serve part where end-users or business users can create their own reports would help in terms of the adoption of Dundas BI. Currently, business users find it difficult to work with Dundas BI because there are so many settings that they don't know what they need to do. Even when a developer starts working on Dundas BI, he needs to spend at least one month or so getting used to the functionalities of Dundas BI. Even then, it is not easy to remember where or how they made a certain property change. It takes at least one month for a developer to get acquainted with it. Working with the color palette is difficult in Dundas BI. They can work on different color palettes and make them organized and user-friendly. It would help a long way. Most of the time, the users face challenges in assigning colors to the fields that they have created or to the dimensions and measures in a chart. Dundas can further reduce the number of settings they have. When you create any chart in Dundas, you get a lot of features to control each setting, which is pretty useful for BI, but for end-users, it is difficult to identify the exact settings to change a property. I would love it if some of the options come pre-selected. If some of the settings are set to best practices by default, it will be helpful. Whenever we have any issues, the error messages that we get in Dundas BI are not very helpful in identifying the root cause. Making these changes will bring a lot of change to the end-user experience.
it_user865386 - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead at a government with 11-50 employees
Enables customers to build their own reports, but performance could be better
The most important criterion when selecting a vendor is reliability. I would give this solution a seven out of 10. It does some good stuff, but there needs to be more performance. Make sure that you have really good people working on the server administration, to make sure you're doing it right, the setup is right.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Layers feature organizes my work and makes it easier, instead of having to use scripting to show and hide when drilling down."
"You don’t have to spend lots of money to have a BI system."
"Currently Dundas BI enables us to provide more rich and interactive data visualizations for end users and this has helped to show performance issues."
"An excellent IDE, that makes building views, like reports and dashboards a breeze."
"The primary reasons why the client opted for Dundas BI were the cost, integration options, and creative visuals."
"Great software, it has a steep learning curve compared to the rest but so much more powerful because of it."
"With Dundas BI, you have a lot of visualization choices, and you can also do customizations by using HTML coding and JavaScript. The ease of development was one of the main factors for going for Dundas BI. The client had different reporting tools, but they wanted something that could accommodate all requirements."
"It was quite easy to use. The UI was basically drag-and-drop based. So, even if you were a beginner at coding software or something else, it would be easy to catch up on Dundas BI."
"Rapid development and deployment of solutions with low-cost server-based licensing is attractive in high user count environments."
"Self-service reporting modules allow customers to build their own reports."
"A must have for the business looking to understand their processes in an easy to consume way"
"People really like the way the reports look, there are lots of fancy bells and whistles on the report designer."
 

Cons

"Working with the color palette is difficult in Dundas BI. They can work on different color palettes and make them organized and user-friendly. It would help a long way. Most of the time, the users face challenges in assigning colors to the fields that they have created or to the dimensions and measures in a chart."
"Your changes are not always saved, which can be very frustrating."
"What our users prefer is a grid of data with the cells being editable, allowing them to update data from within the grid."
"I would love to see more functions built in inside the application, instead of being scripted."
"The addition of funnel charts to the visualization options would be great."
"Some minor technicalities that typically end up getting solved by the awesome support team."
"My current preference would be to work with Tableau or Power BI because they're more user intuitive and both have a good user interface."
"Matrix tables. Add them in !!! Currently, they don't do that, and it's hard to create some BI reports due to this."
"It needs a much lower price. They are jacking up the price every year, which is wrong."
"The only feature I would like to see at this point is a normalized curve for Histograms"
"Performance dependant on back-end much more than some other toolsets."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not aware of its cost. Its licensing was probably role-wise. Most of us had reader access, editor access, or developer access. For admin, there were certain restrictions. So, I'm assuming it had role-wise licensing."
"I am not majorly involved in its licensing. We are not the end license purchaser of the Dundas BI. It costs somewhere around $4,000 a year for the enterprise solution, but I am not sure."
"It needs a much lower price. They are jacking up the price every year, which is wrong."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded BI solutions are best for your needs.
909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
17%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Logi Info
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Coca Cola, Siemens, Verizon, Microsoft, Pitney Bowes, Scotiabank, Pepperidge Farm, Shutterstock, Norwegian Government, Boeing, Guess Inc., BP, Bayer
FedEx, 3M, Perdue, Service King, Marriott, Verizon, TNT, CDC, Network Rail, AT&T, BMC, ALD Automotive.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dundas BI vs. Logi Analytics and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.