Domo vs Workiva Wdesk comparison

Domo and Workiva are both solutions in the Business Performance Management category. Domo is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while Workiva is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0. Domo holds a 2.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to Workiva’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Domo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Workiva users who would recommend it.

Domo

Read 48 Domo reviews

6,185 Views
433 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Workiva Wdesk

Read 7 Workiva Wdesk reviews

2,723 Views
817 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Domo

Workiva Wdesk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Domo and Workiva Wdesk are two prominent solutions in the business analytics and data management field. Domo is known for cost-effectiveness and robust support, whereas Workiva Wdesk strengths lie in its comprehensive feature set, supporting its higher pricing.

Features: Domo provides real-time data visualization and seamless data source integration, driving efficiency in visual analytics. It includes intuitive design, simplifying complex data processes. Workiva Wdesk offers exceptional compliance and auditing functionalities, aiding in regulatory reporting. It ensures collaboration with strong document management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Domo could enhance its analytical depth to compete with more sophisticated tools. Expanding compliance features might broaden its applicability. Improving the scalability of high-load data processes is also crucial. Workiva Wdesk might benefit from reducing complexity in setup for smaller teams. Enhancing intuitive design aspects could make it more user-friendly. Addressing pricing flexibility could attract a wider range of users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Domo is easy to deploy with various integrations, facilitating swift setups and accessible support. Its data connectors make it adaptable. Workiva Wdesk offers scalable cloud-based solutions, requiring specific adjustments for compliance needs. Its customer service is particularly effective for complex regulatory queries, ensuring smooth operation.

Pricing and ROI: Domo typically incurs lower initial costs, providing rapid ROI through data management tools. It is appealing for businesses looking for cost-efficient data solutions. Workiva Wdesk, with higher upfront costs, offers long-term value in regulatory and auditing processes, justifying the investment for compliance-centric organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Domo vs. Workiva Wdesk Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Domo vs. Workiva Wdesk

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,976 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Domo

Ranking in Business Performance Management

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (15th), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (4th), Reporting (4th), Data Visualization (5th)

Workiva Wdesk

Ranking in Business Performance Management

11th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (9th), Financial Close Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Domo is 2.5%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workiva Wdesk is 3.5%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Domo	2.5%
Workiva Wdesk	3.5%
Other	94.0%

Business Performance Management

Featured Reviews

Ruban Prasanna Dass SP

Assistant Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Have improved workflow efficiency through custom reports but encountered formatting limitations

The downsides of Domo are that we don't have a feature in the same column. When data comes in a time format, text format, and number format, we cannot segregate and create conditional formatting in that column. If in the future they develop this feature, it will benefit more users. Domo requires maintenance on my end, such as updates. I am maintaining some dashboards on a weekly basis and monthly basis daily reports. Because we need to upload in SFTP, we cannot schedule or auto-schedule due to rate purposes. We manually handle the data sets. If there were an option to reduce the cost, it would be easier to access.

Read full review

reviewer2510292

Corporate ESG Analyst at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has cross-functional connectivity but improvement is needed in script encoding

The tool's deployment is quick. Once the program is set up, you're ready to collect data and connect it to your report. The deployment team's size depends on the size of the company and how many different data providers you're utilizing. Some companies have one person doing everything, while others have a huge team. We're on the latter end of it, with many people involved. One great thing about the platform is that everything is consolidated in one place, providing a single resource for everyone. This is a benefit. The maintenance of the solution depends on the experience of the person managing the company's program. The company might have a contractor handling the back end and software management if they're low-level and only analyzing the data. However, if you have someone experienced with software and script encoding, that person might be the analyst and managing the program. Generally, most people are just analysts and not managing the software. There's an opportunity for improvement in user management of their software, and I hope they address this gap before the year ends.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The flexibility and usability are probably the best features, and I really appreciate what they're doing now with workflow and AI agents, allowing users to build that kind of agentic flow where data analytics and traditional ETL can quickly and easily embed AI capabilities, which is extremely powerful."

"The best feature of Domo is that it's completely on the cloud. I also like that you can handle data end-to-end without having to depend on multiple tools. Another specific feature I like the most about Domo is Magic ETL because, through it, you can do all your expression, transformation, and loading activities very smoothly. The tool also follows the lineage concept, so you can understand what kind of transformations took place on a particular data set. You can find end-to-end data from the source until it has become the final output or the final data set. Whatever happened to a particular data set, you can understand it through the Domo lineage, and that isn't possible in most of the tools available in the market, but in Domo, that's available. The tool is also solid and because it's on the cloud, it uses multiple data engineering in the backend and multiple algorithms in the back, behind the scenes, resulting in a great performance. For example, if an end user such as the CEO or COO opens a report or the dashboard and it takes more than ten seconds, the end user won't be interested in looking at that report or dashboard, but Domo enables better performance and there's usually no performance issues from that tool."

"In general, of all the reporting tools I've used in the past, I have never been able to rapidly report and build dashboards faster than I have with this tool."

"What makes me really fond of Domo is the ETL because it enables us to maximize a single platform for pulling reports and automating things. We can send the raw data from a third-party platform and do the rest of the ETL in Domo, including transforming data, adding columns, etc."

"We find the ease of using the solution valuable."

"The most ideal aspect about using Domo is it can accommodate a huge amount of data, and we loved the number of sources it provides in a single platform, such as the capability to connect it."

"The dashboard is the most valuable feature and allows for customization to create and share reports."

"When it comes to Domo, we have one platform for data integration as well as for data modeling, transformations, and creating visualizations such as charts, graphs, and cards, which is beneficial because in Power BI we have multiple modules for these functions."

More Domo pros

"Workiva Wdesk has a flow diagram that is standardized, making it easy for people to file documents on ECDAs, which are in HTML format."

"The collaboration within the platform is valuable."

"It makes the compliance process more efficient and more effective."

"Workiva Wdesk is pretty good in terms of getting the data from the system, automating the reporting schedules...It has a very good integration with ERP tools."

"The cross-functionality between connectivity, whether through API connections between different software platforms or the connection of data collection to the actual written ESG report, is highly valuable. The connectivity of all these aspects significantly aids in data assurance, which I consider a bonus."

"It helps you to maintain a backup of your data, including the connectivity with the tables, which provides a user-friendly way to handle and access your files."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to easily upload and update financial results, creating a dynamic data sheet."

Cons

"The forecasting feature, the regression features, and the Python libraries could all be improved."

"There's a learning curve before you can get used to the solution."

"The ETL way of storing is not up to mark. You have to rely on the naming convention that you're using in Domo because there are no folder systems where you can collate all your workflows and put them into separate folders. A folder system should be there so you can easily identify how you are working. Once you want to make some changes to your ETL, then you can see the whole lineage, identifying what is there and not there."

"You can drag and drop your ETL tool, but it doesn't really work for a large amount of data."

"Sometimes the tool tends to be a little laggy, but it depends on what kind of volume of data that we are working in."

"It's quite slow. We have about 2,000,000 rows of data. Creating certain reports takes almost a couple of minutes, which should not be the case."

"Domo or any other BI tool has room for improvement, in particular, in the calculations."

"It is expensive."

More Domo cons

"One area where Workiva Wdesk could improve is by ensuring that its cloud-based system is fully compatible with the most current versions of PowerPoint and Excel."

"The most critical issue is the need to shift between uppercase and lowercase."

"The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandatory or voluntary reporting requirements, leading to lost linkage connections that must be manually reset each time a change is made. This aspect is not functional now, and I see it as an opportunity for improvement."

"At this point, I don't see a compelling reason to invest in Workiva. It may be necessary for compliance and controlling the version of SCC, but not everyone needs its high-end capabilities."

"With this product, it's more about the integrated data model where you can have a one-to-many/many-to-one relationship between your policies and processes, risks, and controls. They need to showcase how you can put those pieces together."

"The speed must be improved."

"Regarding the solution, reporting has certain areas that can be considered for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is on the pricier end."

"They've built an "app economy." Some of them are really expensive, so they're not for startups and smaller companies. They're more like enterprise tools. We couldn't afford some of them, because they were so crazy expensive. But if I was working for a bank, insurance company, or some bigger corporation then, for sure, you could justify those prices... It was silly expensive back then and it probably still is, or even more expensive."

"The pricing differs from customer to customer, depending on the package."

"I believe that the investment in Domo was worthwhile because it allowed for the organization to jump in quickly, with little training. There are different plans available based on the requirements."

"Domo has more than one licensing model. You can choose between the yearly subscription and the per-user licensing model. The tool is flexible in terms of licensing. As for the cost, Domo is an end-to-end BI tool so its pricing is a little higher than other players in the market, for example, non end-to-end BI tools such as OBIEE and Tableau specific only for business intelligence and presenting data to the end users, unlike Domo which handles everything. You want to get Domo as an integration tool, an ETL tool, etc. As the tool is end-to-end, its cost is always going to be a little higher than other BI tools, but it's worth paying because you won't have to spend extra for other activities. After all, Domo can do those activities."

"Domo is slightly costly but it's much cheaper than some."

"The price that they offered was around $200 per user license. It was pretty cheap at that time compared to other companies. I think they have revamped their pricing structure since then."

"I think it is reasonable."

More Domo pricing and cost advice

"Our clients in Asia think that the solution is too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Domo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there was very little.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Domo?

I'm not sure how Domo can be improved overall, as it's a really good experience.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Domo?

My main use case for Domo involves building different tables and different cards so I can look at different data points. A quick specific example of a table I have built or a data point I often loo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workiva Wdesk?

The tool's script encoding needs to be updated to make it more user-friendly and less of a manual process when changes are made to a company's program. Those changes happen frequently due to mandat...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Workiva Wdesk?

I've been working with the tool's script encoding departments and top management to address gaps in their script encoding. They are working towards closing these gaps to ensure we can continue usin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tableau Enterprise vs Domo

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Domo

Compared 24% of the time

QlikView vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

Julius AI vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

More Domo Competitors

AuditBoard vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 9% of the time

RSA Archer vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

Scytale vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

OneStream XF vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Workiva Wdesk

Compared 4% of the time

More Workiva Wdesk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Domo

March 2026

Download Domo product report

Buyer's Guide

Workiva Wdesk

February 2026

Download Workiva Wdesk product report

Also Known As

corda

Wdesk

Overview

Domo is a cloud-based, mobile-first BI platform that helps companies drive more value from their data by helping organizations better integrate, interpret and use data to drive timely decision making and action across the business. The Domo platform enhances existing data warehouse and BI tools and allows users to build custom apps, automate data pipelines, and make data science accessible for anyone through automated insights that can be shared with internal or external stakeholders.

Find more information on The Business Cloud Here.

Domo

Wdesk is used across the enterprise to support hundreds of data collaboration, reporting, and compliance processes. Use Wdesk to:

Optimize your structured and composite reports
Improve trust in your data, reports, and presentations
Transform processes to enable insight

Workiva

Sample Customers

Capco, SABMiller, Stance, eBay, Sage North America, Goodwill Industries of Central Indiana, Telus, The Cliffs, OGIO International Inc., and many more!

Noodles Company, eBay, Winnebago, American Assets Trust, AmericanEnterprise, Calpian, Capstone Infrastructure, Cascades, Circor International, Coeur Mining, Davey, Dr Pepper Snapple

Buyer's Guide

Domo vs. Workiva Wdesk

March 2026

Free Report: Domo vs. Workiva Wdesk

Find out what your peers are saying about Domo vs. Workiva Wdesk and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Domo vs. Workiva Wdesk report.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.