Domo vs Qlik Compose comparison

Domo and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Domo is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.8, while Qlik is ranked #52. Domo holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Qlik’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Domo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Domo

Read 48 Domo reviews

9,987 Views
1,498 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

2,621 Views
2,123 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Domo

Qlik Compose

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Domo and Qlik Compose are competitive in the data integration and management space. Domo seems to have the upper hand in user-friendliness and comprehensive features, while Qlik Compose stands out for its automation and data modeling capabilities.

Features: Domo is designed for ease of use, featuring rapid dashboard creation, comprehensive data integration through numerous connectors, and the ability to manage massive data sources effortlessly. It simplifies graph setup without repeated configurations. Qlik Compose is strong in real-time data integration, enabling data mart creation without coding, and boasts a stable, intuitive interface for data warehouse automation.

Room For Improvement: Domo users seek better data visualization control, enhanced ETL functionalities, and improved collaboration tools. It struggles with very large datasets and offers limited innovative visualization options. Qlik Compose could benefit from improved monitoring and scheduling features, better handling of complex transformations, and enhanced support, documentation, and scalability for high-volume data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Domo offers flexible deployment options, including public and private clouds, and is generally noted for rapid deployment and user-friendly setup, though some users report frustrations with technical support and response times. Qlik Compose also provides deployment flexibility but has room for improvement in customer service, with users experiencing challenges in initial setup and a lack of proactive technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Domo is often seen as expensive, with variable pricing based on organization size and needs, but offers significant ROI through ease of use and comprehensive features. Qlik Compose is noted for its high and rigid pricing, often more expensive than alternatives, yet users recognize the ROI from its robust data automation and integration, enhancing business decisions and operational visibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Domo vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Domo vs. Qlik Compose

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Domo

Ranking in Data Integration

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (6th), Business Performance Management (7th), Reporting (4th), Data Visualization (7th)

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

52nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Domo is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Compose is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Domo	0.7%
Qlik Compose	0.8%
Other	98.5%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Ruban Prasanna Dass SP

Assistant Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Have improved workflow efficiency through custom reports but encountered formatting limitations

The downsides of Domo are that we don't have a feature in the same column. When data comes in a time format, text format, and number format, we cannot segregate and create conditional formatting in that column. If in the future they develop this feature, it will benefit more users. Domo requires maintenance on my end, such as updates. I am maintaining some dashboards on a weekly basis and monthly basis daily reports. Because we need to upload in SFTP, we cannot schedule or auto-schedule due to rate purposes. We manually handle the data sets. If there were an option to reduce the cost, it would be easier to access.

Read full review

Susheel A

Director - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Efficient data warehouse automation with robust features, but may require enhancements in user-friendly self-service options and pricing flexibility for broader corporate appeal

It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it. When it comes to end users who may lack technical expertise, they are limited to toggling between existing developments. To empower end users to make critical changes without relying heavily on technical expertise, it would be beneficial to introduce more user-friendly features for development and modification. If it could incorporate correlation analysis capabilities into its platform, especially in a user-friendly manner, it would greatly enhance the tool's overall utility and make it an even more outstanding solution. There is a room for improvement regarding stability.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The flexibility and usability are probably the best features, and I really appreciate what they're doing now with workflow and AI agents, allowing users to build that kind of agentic flow where data analytics and traditional ETL can quickly and easily embed AI capabilities, which is extremely powerful."

"The tool has some potential, but as of two years ago, it was still a long way from fulfilling on the promise."

"It has helped with productivity and efficiency, saving me an estimated 10 to 15 hours a week and enabling our team to share real-time, accurate data across the country so business decisions are made more efficiently and accurately."

"There are many valuable features, especially the charts and graphs that make it easy to pass information to people that are not really technical."

"In Workbench 5, they have come up with a very useful feature called Upsert. When you're pushing data into the data set, if the data is already available it will update the data, and if that the data is not there it will insert it. That is a beneficial feature that they introduced in the latest version."

"Domo is not a difficult tool to learn. All you need to know is the SQL for the ETL part. You don't need to write much code. That's the great part. It uses legacy languages, like SQL, which is very common among developers who then don't have to go and learn Domo's own syntax. Therefore, you don't have to learn another hard language to use Domo."

"Domo is a comprehensive tool in ETL, visualization, and the media features that we use for the direct connection to all the digital marketing platforms."

"Domo has positively impacted my organization by giving everyone the ability to see different data cards and make decisions quicker without relying on BI."

More Domo pros

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

"It's a stable solution."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"It is a scalable solution."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years."

More Qlik Compose pros

Cons

"All of it. Sometimes it doesn't calculate correctly, it runs slowly, and doesn't offer a solution to things I'm used to doing."

"The ETL way of storing is not up to mark. You have to rely on the naming convention that you're using in Domo because there are no folder systems where you can collate all your workflows and put them into separate folders. A folder system should be there so you can easily identify how you are working. Once you want to make some changes to your ETL, then you can see the whole lineage, identifying what is there and not there."

"The utilization part: We cannot play much with the UX/UI. While they have APIs, they kept on failing if the data volume was too large."

"It's quite slow. We are using about 2,000,000 rows of data. Creating certain reports takes almost a couple of minutes, which should not be the case."

"Domo or any other BI tool has room for improvement, in particular, in the calculations."

"If Domo had a Copilot feature, you could interact with the graphs and talk to the graphs and tables."

"Domo as a solution can be improved in various ways."

"Their STK is not up to date and you can't access it on their website. They have a private STK to access resources in Domo."

More Domo cons

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"I don't think Qlik can be used in a high-volume scenario. It didn't work for us."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"Qlik's ETL and data transformation could be better."

More Qlik Compose cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They've built an "app economy." Some of them are really expensive, so they're not for startups and smaller companies. They're more like enterprise tools. We couldn't afford some of them, because they were so crazy expensive. But if I was working for a bank, insurance company, or some bigger corporation then, for sure, you could justify those prices... It was silly expensive back then and it probably still is, or even more expensive."

"I'm not sure about pricing, but I believe Domo is quite costly. Prior to joining this organization, I had a Domo license with my former employer and I think that license was around $500 to $600 annually. That was for a single license. I think it varies, depending on the organization that is acquiring Domo."

"I think it is reasonable."

"The pricing differs from customer to customer, depending on the package."

"Domo is slightly costly but it's much cheaper than some."

"The solution is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"No matter if you're a developer or an end-user, the licensing cost is around $12 per user per month."

"The price that they offered was around $200 per user license. It was pretty cheap at that time compared to other companies. I think they have revamped their pricing structure since then."

More Domo pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Domo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there was very little.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Domo?

I'm not sure how Domo can be improved overall, as it's a really good experience.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Domo?

My main use case for Domo involves building different tables and different cards so I can look at different data points. A quick specific example of a table I have built or a data point I often loo...

See all answers

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tableau Enterprise vs Domo

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Domo

Compared 18% of the time

Google Data Studio vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Domo

Compared 2% of the time

More Domo Competitors

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Compose

Compared 9% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Qlik Compose

Compared 8% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Qlik Compose

Compared 6% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Domo

August 2026

Download Domo product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

July 2026

Download Qlik Compose product report

Also Known As

corda

Compose, Attunity Compose

Overview

Domo provides self-service BI, enabling users to generate reports without needing a data warehouse. Its cloud-based nature enhances accessibility and performance, while offering customizable dashboards for data-driven decision-making.

Domo stands out for its robust data integration, featuring Magic ETL to streamline processes. Its AI-driven insights, extensive data connectors, and collaboration tools promote secure sharing and analytical proficiency. Although users note room for improvement in visualization, pricing, and data integration, its capabilities in generating executive dashboards and unified analytics remain prominent. Performance and user experience enhancements are desired, including improved support for large data volumes and richer data transformation tools.

What are the key features of Domo?

Self-Service BI: Generate reports without a data warehouse for simplified analysis.
Data Integration: Leverage Magic ETL for easy data management.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor dashboards to specific needs.
AI-Driven Insights: Gain automated insights for better decision-making.
Extensive Data Connectors: Access a wide range of data sources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Domo?

Accessibility: Cloud-based structure ensures data access anywhere.
Performance: Enhanced performance with seamless data processing.
Collaboration: Facilitate secure sharing and collaboration for collective insights.
Decision-Making: Enable data-driven decisions with real-time analytics.

In industries like finance, marketing, project management, and retail, organizations use Domo for crafting executive dashboards, integrating data sources, and conducting advanced analytics. Its capabilities allow them to transform data into insightful dashboards, aiding in performance tracking and actionable insights.

Domo

Qlik Compose enhances data management with ETL capabilities, data integration with CDC, and real-time replication. Its intuitive interface enables easy data modeling and automation, supporting various database integrations.

Qlik Compose is designed for efficient data preparation, migration, and warehouse generation. It incorporates ETL functionalities and data integration with CDC, allowing users to effortlessly create data marts without code. Its automation features facilitate warehouse design while graphical representations and connectivity options increase versatility across multiple sources. Users value its stability, scalability, and the support provided, although improvements in ETL functionalities, performance for large datasets, and NoSQL integration are needed. The solution is widely used in business intelligence with tools like Qlik Replicate for real-time data replication and requires direct SQL for complex transformations.

What are the key features of Qlik Compose?

ETL Capabilities: Simplifies data extraction, transformation, and loading
Data Integration with CDC: Enables real-time data replication
Intuitive Interface: Facilitates easy data modeling and automation
Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Streamlines data task management
Auto-Mapping: Enhances integration of multiple data sources
No-Code Data Marts Creation: Reduces dependency on technical skills

What benefits should users consider in the reviews?

Stability and Scalability: Reliable functioning for growing data needs
Technical Support: Availability of assistance for troubleshooting
Real-Time Replication Capabilities: Efficient data processing and analytics
Low-Code Development: Simplifies complex data handling processes

In industries, Qlik Compose is implemented for enhancing data preparation, migration, and warehousing. It is used in small projects or straightforward data integration tasks and supports business intelligence efforts by offering low-code capabilities, enabling companies to deliver tailored analytics solutions efficiently.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Capco, SABMiller, Stance, eBay, Sage North America, Goodwill Industries of Central Indiana, Telus, The Cliffs, OGIO International Inc., and many more!

Poly-Wood

Buyer's Guide

Domo vs. Qlik Compose

August 2026

Free Report: Domo vs. Qlik Compose

Find out what your peers are saying about Domo vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Domo vs. Qlik Compose report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.