We performed a comparison between Domo and MashZone NextGen Business Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tableau, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization."The dashboarding itself was pretty easy. So both the front and the back end were positive in this case."
"The fact that you can add any data source is valuable. The entire data handling suite they have, all the apps, etc., is pretty amazing. One of the key things, not being a techie or a data-warehouse guy, is that you can connect data sources, and do all kinds of pretty amazing things."
"All our client SLAs and daily and weekly dashboards are tracked on Domo."
"The best thing is that the data storage is pretty much free. I can store as much data as I want, from different sources."
"The data certification feature, where the admin user can put a certified stamp on a data source so that other users can know that that is the correct and accurate data flow or data source to use, is a good feature."
"The user interface is quite good."
"The ETL tools they have in Redshift are pretty awesome... I can work in Redshift to get the data from AWS and work in Redshift, in Domo, to create Transforms and the data structure we need..."
"We find the ease of using the solution valuable."
"Mashzone is the best product on the market for process analysis."
"The technical support from Germany is very good."
"This solution is made to be easy-to-use. If you can use Excel, you can use MashZone."
"The most valuable features are real-time data, introspective data, and input data. The interface is also very easy to use."
"They could use more charts. They have had a very limited number of charts we can use. I believe, now, there are somewhere around 30 of them, but they could definitely use some more options."
"When you're exporting a graph out of Domo — suppose it is in the form of a donut chart or it is in form of a stack — the data comes out in tabular format, not as a graph. When exporting the data, I would like them to create a tab for graphs and another tab with the data in tabular format."
"Their STK is not up to date and you can't access it on their website. They have a private STK to access resources in Domo."
"Their organization or client service didn't always keep up... They took on more and more clients and the processes slowed down a little bit."
"It's quite slow. We are using about 2,000,000 rows of data. Creating certain reports takes almost a couple of minutes, which should not be the case."
"They should include service-based reporting features."
"In Tableau, you can create virtually any kind of visualization. Based on your creativity, you can create a visualization on a human body structure, you can create a visualization on anything that you want. But Domo is limited to a few kinds of visualization views: standard things like bar, pie, and some other charts... I would like to see them add new views for presenting the data in the visualization space."
"I would like to see more dashboard creation options."
"MashZone could be faster and provide more support for IoT platforms."
"MashZone is not very good to use with big data, statistical analysis, or financial analysis. This is not what it is built to do."
Domo is ranked 4th in Data Visualization with 35 reviews while MashZone NextGen Business Analytics is ranked 24th in Data Visualization with 2 reviews. Domo is rated 7.8, while MashZone NextGen Business Analytics is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Domo writes "Robust, powerful, and easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MashZone NextGen Business Analytics writes "Real-time data with a user-friendly interface". Domo is most compared with Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, Databricks, Looker and Amazon QuickSight, whereas MashZone NextGen Business Analytics is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Visualization vendors.
We monitor all Data Visualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
