No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs ngrok comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Diligent One Platform (form...
Ranking in IT Governance
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
GRC (21st), IT Vendor Risk Management (20th)
ngrok
Ranking in IT Governance
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Governance category, the mindshare of Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) is 7.9%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ngrok is 1.0%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Governance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ngrok1.0%
Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)7.9%
Other91.1%
IT Governance
 

Featured Reviews

WW
Data Analyst at Rhythex
Good automation and analytics, but is costly
The report model was our main concern. I believe currently the solution uses a third party for the reporting. As part of a consulting firm, one of the challenges we face is the difficulty in producing reports that meet the expectations of our clients and customers. It would be beneficial if the focus could be shifted toward improving the reporting aspect. The impact report is a crucial aspect, as we only have one opportunity to create it. Galvanize HighBond can improve by generating more impact reports post-project, and allowing access to the reports using a web version, which would greatly benefit us. The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement.
Suraj Jha - PeerSpot reviewer
AI Engineer at Probus Insurance Broker Limited
Generated secure public links has streamlined testing workflows and daily project sharing
ngrok has positively impacted my organization by making development easier because we can check and generate our public URL. It is saving more time, reducing stress, and allowing us to work faster. We can share a link with our teammates so we can check it and do everything we need. After using ngrok for our first project, which was HTML to Base64, HTML to PDF, and PDF to Base64, it worked on the first attempt, so we saved a lot of time. Then we generated our main server, uploaded it to our server, and generated its API. Because of ngrok, we saved two or three days on that project.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is automation."
"In one year we were able to accomplish what we could not in our 3 year Archer contract, and we did it with half the consulting services and one-third the administrators."
"We have far more visibility into our compliance, risks and controls over the areas we are managing versus accepting risk, and Rsam has also been extremely helpful with the annual audits we receive from our regulators."
"Overall, ngrok is a very useful tool for developers, simplifying local testing, especially for APIs and integrations, which helps speed up the development workflow and identify issues early on."
"The specific outcome my team experienced is easier collaboration."
"We see a return on investment with ngrok; there are many benefits I can list down, such as very easy setup, no need for hosting, great for debugging, real-time request inspection, and many more."
"For a simple college project, ngrok was more than enough and definitely met my needs."
"Saved time is the most significant return on investment I have seen from ngrok, as sharing a website or project that initially took around three hours a week is now streamlined to just pushing projects to ngrok for access, saving me about eight to ten hours a month."
"ngrok has positively impacted my organization since everyone uses it for development and testing, and without it, I do not know how we would test locally."
"The free tier of ngrok is one of the best features it offers because even when my API received many hits from the front end, I was able to use this ngrok backend API without any problems and, before going into the production environment, this ngrok free tier was actually saving our time and benefiting employees."
"The best features I can see in ngrok are that it is very stable, user-friendly, great for debugging, and the most efficient way to use it."
 

Cons

"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."
"While they don't need as much consulting to get the product implemented, I do wish they had more available."
"Ngrok offers excellent features including how quickly it operates, how easy it is to set up, and it is free for use for a limited time, though it does have a good amount of latency which I consider a drawback."
"For the documentation part, ngrok should provide an easy transition for legacy users."
"On the free account, the link changes every time I use it."
"In terms of features, ngrok is very feature-rich and reliable, but with heavy usage, the costs can increase based on the usage plan, which could be improved to be a little cheaper."
"The biggest friction point I faced with ngrok was the limitation on the free plan and the occasional need to manage sessions or URLs again."
"One improvement I have noticed is when configuring integrations with external APIs like Slack."
"ngrok can be improved in the following way: when we unexpectedly close the laptop or sometimes close the page where we are running ngrok, that can be improved."
"When I hit the limit for the first time, I was taken aback as I was not paying attention, and at that moment, I wished the limits were a little higher."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I give the cost of the solution a six out of ten."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Governance solutions are best for your needs.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Insurance Company
42%
Construction Company
17%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ngrok?
I primarily use ngrok in the free tier, which is superb. The setup is easy, and the documentation is outstanding, making it easy to resolve any issues I face without needing to contact customer sup...
What needs improvement with ngrok?
One improvement I have noticed is when configuring integrations with external APIs like Slack. After a machine or session restart, I have to generate a new URL, forcing me to change the webhooks in...
What is your primary use case for ngrok?
In my AI automation field, I have been working for around eight to twelve months. The main use case where ngrok comes into the picture is when I create any development projects, which can be coded ...
 

Also Known As

Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize , Diligent GRC Platform
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

CNA Insurance
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs. ngrok and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.