Digital Safe vs Oracle SAM-FS comparison

Smarsh and Oracle are both solutions in the File Archiving category. Smarsh is ranked #9, while Oracle is ranked #18. Smarsh holds a 4.2% mindshare in FA, compared to Oracle’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Smarsh users are willing to recommend the solution.

Digital Safe

Read 1 Digital Safe review

166 Views
159 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle SAM-FS

86 Views
68 Comparison Views

Digital Safe

Oracle SAM-FS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Digital Safe and Oracle SAM-FS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Veritas, OpenText and others in File Archiving.

To learn more, read our detailed File Archiving Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

File Archiving

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,778 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital Safe

Ranking in File Archiving

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle SAM-FS

Ranking in File Archiving

18th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the File Archiving category, the mindshare of Digital Safe is 4.2%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle SAM-FS is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

File Archiving Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Digital Safe	4.2%
Oracle SAM-FS	1.6%
Other	94.2%

File Archiving

Featured Reviews

it_user948

digital strategist at SMD Services

Solid product, functionally rich, but complex.

The message archiving tool is very powerful and can handle many search / flagging scenarios, as well as numerous message types (SMS, E-mail, bloomberg, etc). With flexibility comes complexity. The solution is very complex and requires significant configuration. If hosting…

Read full review

Use Oracle SAM-FS?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File Archiving solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparisons

ZL Unified Archive vs Digital Safe

Compared 63% of the time

Atempo Digital Archive vs Digital Safe

Compared 37% of the time

More Digital Safe Competitors

OpenText Content Manager vs Oracle SAM-FS

Compared 100% of the time

More Oracle SAM-FS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

File Archiving

October 2025

Download Digital Safe product report

Buyer's Guide

File Archiving

October 2025

Download Oracle SAM-FS product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Digital Safe, Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Autonomy Zantaz, HPE Digital Safe

SAM-FS

Overview

Autonomy Zantaz is a highly scalable and flexible archiving platform that enables your organization to capture and preserve email messages, attachments, and files in a way that both optimizes storage and allows immediate access for discovery and review by courts, regulators, administrators, and end-users. Powered by IDOL, EAS automates the processing of enormous volumes of information, dynamically exposing the patterns, linkages and meaning within.

Smarsh

Information not available

Oracle

Sample Customers

EDF, Morgan Stanley, RateCity, Missouri State Courts

AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Emirates Nuclear Energy Corporation, LG Fashion

Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Veritas, OpenText and others in File Archiving. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,778 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best File Archiving vendors.

We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.