Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Digital.ai and Tricentis are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tricentis is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Digital.ai holds a 4.3% mindshare in MTT, compared to Tricentis’s 23.0% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 7 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

2,583 Views
1,007 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 114 Tricentis Tosca reviews

24,768 Views
5,944 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Tricentis Tosca and Digital.ai Continuous Testing are key players in automated testing tools. Analysis indicates Digital.ai Continuous Testing has an advantage with its advanced features and value.

Features: Tricentis Tosca emphasizes model-based automation for simplified test creation and execution, supporting test management with reusable assets. Digital.ai Continuous Testing excels in integration capabilities, supporting continuous integration and deployment environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers straightforward deployment and attentive support, aiding swift resolution of issues. Digital.ai Continuous Testing provides adaptable deployment for varied infrastructures and strong support.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca offers attractive pricing with potential for rapid ROI due to low initial costs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing, despite higher initial pricing, delivers strong ROI through its advanced features for long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

114

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 4.3%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 23.0%, down from 31.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tricentis Tosca	23.0%
Digital.ai Continuous Testing	4.3%
Other	72.7%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Mampi Bhattacharya

Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Continuous testing has accelerated daily releases and now provides faster, richer debugging insights

Digital.ai Continuous Testing could be better in certain areas, and I can share my experience-based view on what can be frustrating. One issue is device availability and queue delays during peak CI hours. Sometimes devices are busy, causing tests to queue and the pipeline to slow down unexpectedly, which is especially painful for large regression suites or tight release timelines. Improvements are needed in smarter auto-scaling of device pools and better priority-based scheduling. Additionally, execution speed variability occurs; the same test sometimes runs fast and sometimes slow, depending on device load and network latency, making results less predictable. More stable execution environments and better performance isolation per session would help. Furthermore, debugging can still be indirect; even with logs or videos, I do not fully control the device as I would with local debugging, making it hard to pause and inspect live states or reproduce edge-case issues locally. More interactive debugging and improved local reproduction tools are necessary. Cost versus usage efficiency is another area of concern, as device cloud usage can be expensive and we sometimes have idle or inefficient tests that waste money. Improvements in usage analytics and cost optimization suggestions for smart test selection to run only impacted tests are areas where I believe Digital.ai Continuous Testing could improve.

Read full review

AKSHAYRATHI

Senior engineer at Nagarro

End-to-end regression automation has accelerated delivery and now secures complex test data

I think Tosca can be improved, particularly in AI capabilities because right now Tosca does not have any strong API capabilities. It has some AI features in the newer version, but many organizations have not adopted these due to version-specific problems, as some are still using older versions. From an AI point of view, they can enhance reliability since the world is moving towards AI, and every tool must be integrated. While Tosca has made attempts, I have not used them and they are not widely adopted, so they are stuck in the testing phase in my organization. I would also mention that while I am currently using Tosca Mobile, the loading part and connectivity issues need improvement. They should better integrate AI features that are already present but not widely used across many organizations. Reliability on the AI aspect needs enhancement for practical application. From the perspective of governance and security, I believe Tosca can develop its own LLM or leverage third-party LLMs while maintaining security and risk management regarding client data. Many companies prefer using Tosca due to data security, which is crucial. An in-house LLM could significantly enhance its debugging power and provide helpful solutions upon test case failure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has had a pretty positive impact on the organization, especially in terms of speed and reliability."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has had a very positive impact in terms of efficiency and quality."

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing, and they also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"I have seen a clear positive ROI after implementing Digital.ai Continuous Testing, especially in terms of time saving, faster release cycle, and improved efficiency."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing has positively impacted my organization with massive reductions in testing time, enabling us to cut our regression cycle from two to three days down to two to three hours, transition from weekly releases to nearly daily deployments, and reduce production defects by 30 to 50% while significantly improving debugging efficiency and overall team productivity."

"The most valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca is it is a completely scriptless automation tool, which I liked a lot. They keep on continuously improving their tools, wherever we are facing any challenges they are able to provide a solution for it. It is easy to learn, everyone can easily read and understand what is happening with the scripts. Any business user or function tester can use the tool efficiently. This is a complete solution package."

"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."

"The product is very useful in keeping track of test execution and coverage."

"To me, what stands out the most about Tricentis Tosca is that even if I'm not a technical tester, I could pick up on how to use it very quickly because of the mechanisms of the tool, for example, its scanning mechanism. I'm not so technical, but I'm able to maneuver through Tricentis Tosca and derive capability. It's a user-friendly tool. It's not very complex."

"I like how the modules are set up, particularly how you can use the screens you're automating. This automation helps save both time and money because we use less test capacity regarding personnel."

"We can also create customized functions. For example, if something isn't supported in Tricentis Tosca Commander, we can create our own function to integrate it with Tosca Commander, so we can utilize it and integrate with the macros."

"The model-based scriptless automation is the most valuable feature because it needs less maintenance as compared to script-based automation."

"Tricentis Tosca can be easily integrated with SAP infrastructure."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a strong platform, but there are a few areas where it could be improved to make the experience even better."

"Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a solid tool, but there are a few things that can be frustrating at times."

"One challenge is that the initial setup and integration with CI/CD pipelines can sometimes be a bit complex, especially for teams new to automation."

"The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before."

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"Device availability and queue delays during peak CI hours are an issue; sometimes devices are busy, causing tests to queue and the pipeline to slow down unexpectedly, which is especially painful for large regression suites or tight release timelines."

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing cons

"Product quality has declined as it grows, and its updates aren't without fault. The process of resolving problems has slowed, and as it expands into other areas like NeoLoad and other testing tools, the product becomes more complicated. It used to be a small firm with a clear goal, but as it grows, the quality has been affected."

"There have been some setbacks because of upgrades. While Tosca has been around for a while, Tricentis has catered to smaller clients and I don't think they have done such a large, at-scale transition or transformation before or worked with a company like ours, which is doing an enterprise-wide transformation. When we go to their customer advisory-board meetings, upgrades have been an issue. They have been working a lot to make upgrades seamless."

"With regard to areas of improvement, report customization should be easier. It would be good if Tosca could provide standard reports for at least 20 variants. At present, there are only three to four variants. The mobile engine needs to be faster and easier to use; it is a bit cumbersome. Also, the object identification in the mobile engine needs improvement. I would like to see easy-to-use customizations for reports in the next release."

"Many times when we have raised a ticket, we did not get an urgent response."

"The stability and reliability of Tricentis Tosca is just 60% for me."

"Most of us have had the complaint that loop statements are missing, without which testing in reality was difficult, as many times test scenarios needed to be run in iteration and version 8.4 has included this feature."

"I personally feel like the pricing is a little bit on the high end."

"We faced some hardships in implementing the solution because of integration."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"Pricing for Tricentis Tosca could be improved because it's very expensive."

"Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked."

"The price of the tool is a problem for a lot of Brazilian clients or Latino clients, as it is expensive. Where I work, if one is low price and ten is high price, I rate the tool's price as a ten out of ten."

"The pricing and licensing of Tricentis Tosca were alright. Many customers look for end-to-end enterprise solutions, there were not many challenges with the pricing. However, the customers who are coming from Selenium or similar, feel they're paying a premium for this Tricentis Tosca license. If the right person is there for the implementation of the Tricentis Tosca, then it is one of the best tools in the market."

"Tricentis Tosca is not expensive at all."

"Tricentis Tosca should improve its pricing. It is expensive."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive tool and the licensing is not simple."

"I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to talk about the pricing, but it has some significant costs. For example, you have to pay a license and maintenance fee. Then the rest of the terms are negotiable. We have to consider what we need and what benefit we get from it."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

20%

University

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

Digital.ai Continuous Testing is a solid tool, but there are a few things that can be frustrating at times. One thing I noticed is that the initial setup and configuration can feel complex, especia...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The main use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing has been automating test execution as part of the CI/CD pipeline, especially for ensuring builds are stable before the release. For example, I us...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

If someone is considering using Digital.ai Continuous Testing, my advice would be to start with a clear workflow in mind. From my experience, it works best when you use it as part of a CI/CD pipeli...

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tricentis Tosca?

The pricing for Tricentis Tosca is extremely high, and I rate it as ten in terms of expense. It is really pricey in the market, making it more suitable for large enterprises rather than small or me...

See all answers

Comparisons

Eggplant Test vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 11% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 7% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 5% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete Mobile vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 3% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 16% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 3% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

November 2026

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

October 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers automated testing with real device cloud access and CI/CD integration to efficiently manage web and mobile app testing, ensuring reliability and consistency.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing is designed to streamline testing by automating executions across multiple environments and devices, reducing manual efforts and speeding up feedback cycles. With features like cross-browser testing, and integration into CI/CD pipelines, it helps detect defects early and improve release quality. Users benefit from parallel and automated test executions for faster delivery and enhanced compatibility, leveraging Mobile Studio for versatile scripting. However, initial setup can be complex, and users note UI/UX improvements and issue navigation challenges. Despite these, it facilitates quality assurance through its comprehensive testing capabilities.

What are the key features of Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

Real Device Cloud Access: Provides extensive testing across different devices.
CI/CD Integration: Streamlines testing within development pipelines.
Automated Test Execution: Speeds up testing processes with parallel runs.
Cross-Browser Testing: Ensures compatibility and functionality across browsers.
Mobile Studio Scripting: Allows diverse scripting for mobile tests.

What benefits should users consider?

Efficiency Improvements: Significant reduction in manual testing efforts.
Time Savings: Faster feedback and early defect detection.
Reliability & Consistency: Better outcomes with multi-device testing.
Improved Release Quality: Higher delivery and compatibility standards.

Industries utilize Digital.ai Continuous Testing to automate and integrate testing within CI/CD pipelines for web and mobile applications, improving application quality by testing across varied devices and environments. It enhances release quality and delivery speed by verifying new features, detecting bugs early, and supporting accessibility testing. This facilitates rapid feedback by prioritizing critical tests and maintaining stability pre-release.

Digital.ai

Tricentis Tosca offers scriptless test automation, supporting diverse technology platforms, enabling users to swiftly create and manage tests without programming skills.

Tricentis Tosca is recognized for its scriptless approach to automation, greatly simplifying the test creation process. Its modular design and comprehensive technology support accommodate web, mobile, and ERP applications with ease. Users can integrate Tosca with multiple platforms, allowing seamless testing across diverse environments. Features like Vision AI enhance test coverage, while the model-based framework ensures efficient maintenance and scalability. Despite needing improvements in documentation, interface simplicity, and cost-effectiveness, Tosca remains a highly regarded tool in the testing automation landscape.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Scriptless Automation: Allows test creation without coding.
Broad Technology Support: Covers web, mobile, and ERP apps.
Model-Based Testing: Facilitates easy maintenance and scalability.
Vision AI: Improves test coverage and precision.
Risk-Based Testing: Optimizes resource allocation for testing.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Ease of Use: Reduces need for technical expertise.
Efficiency: Saves time and resources in test management.
Integration: Compatible with platforms like Azure DevOps.
Scalability: Grows with testing needs without complex adjustments.
Test Accuracy: Minimizes errors with model-based design.

Tricentis Tosca is frequently implemented in industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it streamlines test automation for web applications, SAP, Salesforce, and database systems. Its ease of use enhances efficiency, allowing teams in these sectors to deploy and maintain reliable software solutions swiftly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

September 2026

Free Report: Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.