Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs OpenText UFT One comparison

Digital.ai and OpenText are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Digital.ai holds a 1.5% mindshare in MTT, compared to OpenText’s 23.2% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Digital.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Read 3 Digital.ai Continuous Testing reviews

218 Views
93 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT One

Read 96 OpenText UFT One reviews

3,462 Views
156 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

OpenText UFT One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText UFT One and Digital.ai Continuous Testing compete in the test automation landscape. Digital.ai Continuous Testing emerges as the preferred choice due to its comprehensive feature set and operational efficiency.

Features: OpenText UFT One provides robust cross-platform testing capabilities, an extensive range of integrations with enterprise tools, and reliable automation processes. Digital.ai Continuous Testing offers advanced cloud testing options, significant scalability, and efficient automation, alongside broad test coverage and versatile test execution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Digital.ai Continuous Testing is recognized for its seamless cloud-based deployment model, enabling quick setup, and its customer service is noted for being responsive and supportive. OpenText UFT One has a traditional on-premises deployment, which can result in longer setup times, although it maintains good customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT One demands a substantial initial investment but promises significant returns through reliable performance and robust testing functionalities. Digital.ai Continuous Testing may involve higher ongoing costs yet offers a high ROI through its extensive automation features and value-centric pricing, which often offsets initial expense considerations.

To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. OpenText UFT One Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. OpenText UFT One

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

8th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd)

OpenText UFT One

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

2nd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (2nd), API Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Continuous Testing is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText UFT One is 23.2%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Alan Chiou

PM at Galaxy Software Services

Has Mobile Studio feature which can generate scripts

The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version.

Read full review

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Experitest is one of the only companies to offer a real device on the cloud to perform testing. They also provide quality documentations that help you navigate and maximize the solution."

"The most valuable part of Experitest is the number of real devices on which the test is run."

"The most useful feature for me is Mobile Studio. It has a UI where I can click on elements, and it generates a script for me. Mobile Studio can generate code from testing steps. I'm using Python with it."

"With certainty, the best feature of UFT is its compatibility with so many products, tools and technologies. It is a challenge currently to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully work for so many projects and environments. For example, UFT supports GUI testing of Oracle, PeopleSoft, PowerBuilder, SAP (v7.20), Siebel, Stingray, Terminal Emulator, Putty, and Windows Objects (particularly Dialog Boxes). Furthermore, UFT has the built-in functionality to import Excel input files."

"Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge."

"One advantage of Micro Focus UFT is that it is more compatible with SAP, Desktop ECC SAP, than S/4HANA."

"Compared to other products, UFT One is better, faster, and more accurate."

"I like the fact that you can record and play the record of your step scripts, and UFT One creates the steps for you in the code base. After that, you can alter the code, and it's more of a natural language code."

"The most valuable features for us are the GUI, the easy identification of objects, and folder structure creation."

"The high-level security, high standard and compatible SAP are great."

"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."

More OpenText UFT One pros

Cons

"I would also like to see more videos and descriptions that could make installation more efficient."

"I have been automating tests for many years on many things but not on mobile devices. The amount of time that I have spent on just figuring out how to use Experitest and get it to work was quite long compared to what I have been doing before. I spent the first two weeks just getting it started. It would be good to have some video explanation of how to use it on your devices and get started. Their online documentation is quite good and extensive, but it would be quite good to have some end-to-end examples demonstrated."

"The integration process was good, but I've faced some challenges. Every time they release a new version, I find bugs in the UI and features. Sometimes, buttons don't work well. When this happens, I submit a ticket to technical support, but they often have to fix it in the next version."

"I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications."

"The overall design needs an entire overhaul. We prefer software designed to ensure the package isn't too loaded."

"The solution is expensive."

"Sometimes UFT can take a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected."

"[Tech support is] not a 10 because what happens with some of our issues is that we might not get a patch quickly and we have to hold on to an application until we get a proper solution."

"The product should evolve to be flexible so one can use any programming language such as Java and C#, and not just VB script."

"Micro Focus UFT One could benefit from creating modules that are more accessible to non-technical users. Without a developer background or at least basic knowledge of VBScript, using Micro Focus UFT One may not be feasible for everyone. This is something that Micro Focus, now owned by OpenText, should consider in order to cater to business professionals as well. While Micro Focus UFT One does have a recording function, it still requires a certain level of IT proficiency to create effective automation, which may be challenging for those outside of the technical field."

"Sometimes it appears that UFT takes a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected. Also, UFT uses a lot of memory. On this note, if you are running UFT on a virtual server I would add more RAM memory than the minimum requirements especially when using multiple add-ins. HP is pretty good about coming out with new patches to fix known issues and it pays for the user to check for new patches and updates on a regular basis."

More OpenText UFT One cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We make monthly payments. The cost is dependent on the number of devices we intend to support."

"The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker."

"It is quite fairly priced, but it really depends on your budget. It is somewhere in the mid-range of products. It is not free and it is not QGP that nearly costs a whole house. You pay for the number of users who require access to execute the tests."

"Compared to other tools in the market, UFT One is very competitive. The recent Covid pandemic situation also hit customer budgets significantly, so Micro Focus offered some discounted prices, which is definitely competitive."

"For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."

"It's a yearly subscription. There are no additional costs to the standard subscription."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"Compared to other products, the solution is very expensive."

"It's an expensive solution."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

"The pricing of the product is an issue."

More OpenText UFT One pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

20%

Retailer

10%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

The price is reasonable for our company, but I'm not the decision-maker.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Continuous Testing?

I'm using Digital.ai Continuous Testing to create and test a mobile application. We're developing and testing a mobile app.

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

OpenText UFT One required knowledge of VBScript, which is a limited version of Visual Basic. We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory ...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 65% of the time

Perfecto vs Digital.ai Continuous Testing

Compared 35% of the time

More Digital.ai Continuous Testing Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 31% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText UFT One

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText UFT One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. Digital.ai Continuous Testing

April 2025

Download Digital.ai Continuous Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT One

May 2025

Download OpenText UFT One product report

Also Known As

Experitest Seetest, Experitest

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

Overview

Experitest's continuous testing solutions enable enterprises to reduce risk and provide their customers satisfying, error-free experiences across all devices and browsers. They seamlessly integrate with best-in-class tools throughout the DevOps pipeline allowing organizations to rapidly deliver highly protected, quality applications at-speed and at-scale.

Digital.ai

Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications.

Read white paper

OpenText

Sample Customers

Samsung, American Express, Barclays, China Mobile, Citi, Cisco, McAfee

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

Buyer's Guide

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. OpenText UFT One

May 2025

Free Report: Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. OpenText UFT One

Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. OpenText UFT One and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs. OpenText UFT One report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.