Devo vs syslog-ng by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and One Identity are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while One Identity is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to One Identity’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,610 Views
3,957 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

syslog-ng by One Identity

Read 7 syslog-ng by One Identity reviews

4,310 Views
4,310 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

syslog-ng by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

Devo and syslog-ng by One Identity both excel in the log management sector, with Devo holding an advantage in analytics and ease of use, while syslog-ng emphasizes security.

Features: Devo's platform is noted for its scalability, real-time analytics, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with cloud solutions, offering an advanced data processing engine. In contrast, syslog-ng focuses on secure log collection, providing robust encryption and support for multiple platforms, prioritizing security and versatility.

Room for Improvement: Devo could enhance its on-premises integration for clients seeking non-cloud options and optimize deployment in hybrid infrastructures. Its learning curve for non-technical users might be steep, necessitating more intuitive guides. Syslog-ng could improve by reducing its complexity and deployment challenges, as well as offering more competitive pricing to accommodate smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo offers cloud-native deployment with flexibility and strong customer support for cloud operations. Syslog-ng requires more effort in deployment due to its on-premises and hybrid model, though it provides high security options.

Pricing and ROI: Devo's pricing is competitive, emphasizing value through cloud efficiencies and promising substantial ROI for organizations centered on data analytics. Syslog-ng has a higher initial cost attributed to its security features, representing a justified investment for those prioritizing secure log management.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,994 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (17th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

syslog-ng by One Identity

Ranking in Log Management

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of syslog-ng by One Identity is 1.4%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
syslog-ng by One Identity	1.4%
Devo	1.4%
Other	97.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Oliver Castellucchio

IT Infrastructure & Cloud Security Manager at Thux

Has ensured compliance by centralizing log data and supporting secure connections

We currently do not use that feature. We currently have just an open-source release, not a premium release. My boss has indicated that he wants to buy a premium syslog-ng version next month. I think we can use other features of this tool in the future. In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Because of the way Devo works, our onboarding time has shrunk by 50 percent at least."

"Devo has positively impacted our organization because we have been using only one tool for our centralized logging systems."

"I'm so happy with the platform."

"It is a joy to partner and be able to work with this kind of system."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"Devo provides good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

More Devo pros

"The ability to extract and store the logs is the most valuable feature of syslog-ng."

"What I appreciate most about syslog-ng is its configuration; its C-style config is much easier to understand, read, and write than other popular solutions such as syslog or rsyslog."

"Syslog-ng provides easy access to all my logs. It helps me show managers and other clients precisely where an incident occurred. I also like it because you can integrate syslog-ng with multiple solutions to allow real-time monitoring."

"Syslog-ng has a separate config file in addition to the core configuration."

"We chose syslog-ng because it is easy to install, easy to maintain, easy to update, and due to the fact that all data arrive in raw format, we can manipulate it as we want."

"Syslog-ng has built-in features that we can use to create alerts for a SIEM solution. It isn't a true SIEM solution, but it's sufficient for the time being."

"For us, the most valuable feature is the use of compound search for searching logs at a specific time, by a specific user, or specific behavior."

Cons

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"However, the incident and threat detection is not what we had hoped for."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

More Devo cons

"The filtering has room for improvement."

"In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it."

"There is always the potential for additional integration and protocol extensions."

"It's hard to find people who know how to use syslog-ng. I often find problems with configurations, and solutions aren't integrated correctly with syslog-ng. For example, there might be data with extra decimals, or the collector agents are incorrectly named. It isn't a problem with the solution; it's a lack of professionals."

"There is room for improvement in terms of observability."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"Syslog-ng is open-source."

"Syslog-ng is a free open-source solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with syslog-ng?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for syslog-ng?

In Italy, we have to be compliant with the Garante for privacy. We have to log every login, logout, or login failure made by a system administrator. We store all syslog data of the infrastructure. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering syslog-ng?

When it comes to parsing, I can parse both structured and unstructured data, though our data are only structured. Currently, we collect all data we receive as raw data. Each file is stored for each...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Graylog Enterprise vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Grafana Loki vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Logstash vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Cribl vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More syslog-ng by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

August 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

syslog-ng by One Identity

August 2026

Download syslog-ng by One Identity product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Syslog-ng is recognized for its proficiency in log extraction, storage, and secure TLS connections. Its efficient configuration and real-time monitoring integration make it a preferred option for large-scale log processing, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

Syslog-ng offers powerful log management capabilities, accommodating complex search needs while maintaining simplicity with user-friendly documentation and real-time monitoring features. The C-style configuration enhances readability, allowing users to easily comprehend and implement changes. Designed for high performance, Syslog-ng scales effectively to handle extensive logging demands. Despite its strengths, areas for improvement include integration with protocols and filtering methods. Users advocate for better Kafka integration and a graphical configuration interface to simplify setup. While historical dissatisfaction led to custom patches, subsequent updates have addressed these concerns. Currently, users seek an advanced version to access premium functionalities.

What are the most important features of syslog-ng?

Log Extraction and Storage: Streamlined processes for efficient data handling.
TLS-Supported Secure Connections: Ensures secure data transmission over networks.
Real-Time Monitoring Integration: Enhances proactive decision-making capabilities.
"C-Style" Configuration: Improves readability and simplifies setup for users.
High-Performance Log Processing: Supports large-scale environments with ease.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating syslog-ng?

Easy Configuration: Reduces time and complexity for initial setup and adjustments.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates adherence to data regulations in Brazil and Italy.
Intuitive Examples and Documentation: Simplifies user training and onboarding.
Smooth Multi-Server Setups: Enables efficient deployment across multiple servers.

Organizations frequently use syslog-ng for log aggregation, filtering, and regulatory compliance, serving as a crucial component in enterprise security audits and data regulation adherence in Brazil and Italy. By allowing logs to be stored in raw format, syslog-ng provides versatility in data manipulation and user activity tracking, making it user-friendly for installation, maintenance, and updates. Logs can be transmitted over TLS or plain text to central servers, supporting varied transmission needs.

One Identity

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Tecnocom, University of Victoria, University of Exeter, Datapath

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

August 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.