Devo vs syslog-ng by One Identity comparison

Devo and One Identity are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while One Identity is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0. Devo holds a 1.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to One Identity’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 26 Devo reviews

6,397 Views
3,262 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

syslog-ng by One Identity

Read 7 syslog-ng by One Identity reviews

3,786 Views
3,748 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

syslog-ng by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

Devo and syslog-ng by One Identity both excel in the log management sector, with Devo holding an advantage in analytics and ease of use, while syslog-ng emphasizes security.

Features: Devo's platform is noted for its scalability, real-time analytics, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with cloud solutions, offering an advanced data processing engine. In contrast, syslog-ng focuses on secure log collection, providing robust encryption and support for multiple platforms, prioritizing security and versatility.

Room for Improvement: Devo could enhance its on-premises integration for clients seeking non-cloud options and optimize deployment in hybrid infrastructures. Its learning curve for non-technical users might be steep, necessitating more intuitive guides. Syslog-ng could improve by reducing its complexity and deployment challenges, as well as offering more competitive pricing to accommodate smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo offers cloud-native deployment with flexibility and strong customer support for cloud operations. Syslog-ng requires more effort in deployment due to its on-premises and hybrid model, though it provides high security options.

Pricing and ROI: Devo's pricing is competitive, emphasizing value through cloud efficiencies and promising substantial ROI for organizations centered on data analytics. Syslog-ng has a higher initial cost attributed to its security features, representing a justified investment for those prioritizing secure log management.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 905,526 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (27th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (19th)

syslog-ng by One Identity

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of syslog-ng by One Identity is 1.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
syslog-ng	1.3%
Devo	1.3%
Other	97.4%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Oliver Castellucchio

IT Infrastructure & Cloud Security Manager at Thux

Has ensured compliance by centralizing log data and supporting secure connections

We currently do not use that feature. We currently have just an open-source release, not a premium release. My boss has indicated that he wants to buy a premium syslog-ng version next month. I think we can use other features of this tool in the future. In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Devo has positively impacted our organization because we have been using only one tool for our centralized logging systems."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

"Overall, Devo is awesome, but it's got some room to grow."

"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."

"With Devo, we can eliminate swivel chair analysis among tools for a streamlined workflow that gives us the most direct path to the root cause."

"Devo saves us hours in every investigation."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

More Devo pros

"The ability to extract and store the logs is the most valuable feature of syslog-ng."

"We chose syslog-ng because it is easy to install, easy to maintain, easy to update, and due to the fact that all data arrive in raw format, we can manipulate it as we want."

"What I appreciate most about syslog-ng is its configuration; its C-style config is much easier to understand, read, and write than other popular solutions such as syslog or rsyslog."

"Syslog-ng has a separate config file in addition to the core configuration."

"Syslog-ng has built-in features that we can use to create alerts for a SIEM solution. It isn't a true SIEM solution, but it's sufficient for the time being."

"Syslog-ng provides easy access to all my logs. It helps me show managers and other clients precisely where an incident occurred. I also like it because you can integrate syslog-ng with multiple solutions to allow real-time monitoring."

"For us, the most valuable feature is the use of compound search for searching logs at a specific time, by a specific user, or specific behavior."

Cons

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"There's room for improvement within the GUI. There is also some room for improvement within the native parsers they support. But I can say that about pretty much any solution in this space."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring."

More Devo cons

"There is always the potential for additional integration and protocol extensions."

"There is room for improvement in terms of observability."

"In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it."

"It's hard to find people who know how to use syslog-ng. I often find problems with configurations, and solutions aren't integrated correctly with syslog-ng. For example, there might be data with extra decimals, or the collector agents are incorrectly named. It isn't a problem with the solution; it's a lack of professionals."

"The filtering has room for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"Syslog-ng is a free open-source solution."

"Syslog-ng is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

905,526 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Pricing generally depends on the scale, data ingestion requirements, and integrations for what the enterprise monitoring needs. I have not been part of the procurement process, so I am not aware of...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

I think some features could be added to Devo. The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs. Additionally, while the sup...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

My main use case for Devo is that it serves as a primary tool for centralized logging solutions, mainly for threat investigation and alert monitoring. It helps us with security and analytic analyti...

See all answers

What needs improvement with syslog-ng?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for syslog-ng?

In Italy, we have to be compliant with the Garante for privacy. We have to log every login, logout, or login failure made by a system administrator. We store all syslog data of the infrastructure. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering syslog-ng?

When it comes to parsing, I can parse both structured and unstructured data, though our data are only structured. Currently, we collect all data we receive as raw data. Each file is stored for each...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Graylog Enterprise vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 10% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Cribl vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Grafana Loki vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Logstash vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More syslog-ng by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

July 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

syslog-ng by One Identity

June 2026

Download syslog-ng by One Identity product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Syslog-ng is recognized for its proficiency in log extraction, storage, and secure TLS connections. Its efficient configuration and real-time monitoring integration make it a preferred option for large-scale log processing, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

Syslog-ng offers powerful log management capabilities, accommodating complex search needs while maintaining simplicity with user-friendly documentation and real-time monitoring features. The C-style configuration enhances readability, allowing users to easily comprehend and implement changes. Designed for high performance, Syslog-ng scales effectively to handle extensive logging demands. Despite its strengths, areas for improvement include integration with protocols and filtering methods. Users advocate for better Kafka integration and a graphical configuration interface to simplify setup. While historical dissatisfaction led to custom patches, subsequent updates have addressed these concerns. Currently, users seek an advanced version to access premium functionalities.

What are the most important features of syslog-ng?

Log Extraction and Storage: Streamlined processes for efficient data handling.
TLS-Supported Secure Connections: Ensures secure data transmission over networks.
Real-Time Monitoring Integration: Enhances proactive decision-making capabilities.
"C-Style" Configuration: Improves readability and simplifies setup for users.
High-Performance Log Processing: Supports large-scale environments with ease.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating syslog-ng?

Easy Configuration: Reduces time and complexity for initial setup and adjustments.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates adherence to data regulations in Brazil and Italy.
Intuitive Examples and Documentation: Simplifies user training and onboarding.
Smooth Multi-Server Setups: Enables efficient deployment across multiple servers.

Organizations frequently use syslog-ng for log aggregation, filtering, and regulatory compliance, serving as a crucial component in enterprise security audits and data regulation adherence in Brazil and Italy. By allowing logs to be stored in raw format, syslog-ng provides versatility in data manipulation and user activity tracking, making it user-friendly for installation, maintenance, and updates. Logs can be transmitted over TLS or plain text to central servers, supporting varied transmission needs.

One Identity

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Tecnocom, University of Victoria, University of Exeter, Datapath

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

June 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

905,526 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. syslog-ng by One Identity report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.