Devo vs LogLogic comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and TIBCO are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while TIBCO is ranked #50. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to TIBCO’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,610 Views
3,957 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

LogLogic

Read 2 LogLogic reviews

3,260 Views
2,021 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Devo

LogLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

LogLogic and Devo offer robust log management and analytics solutions to their users. LogLogic is preferred for its pricing and customer support, while Devo stands out for its advanced features and overall perceived value despite higher costs.

Features: Users value LogLogic’s straightforward configuration, comprehensive audit capabilities, and cost-effective setup. Devo is praised for its scalable architecture, real-time analytics, and advanced insights providing users with more flexibility.

Room for Improvement: LogLogic users cite occasional performance lags, a clunky search function, and a need for a more efficient querying process. Devo users mention the need for a more intuitive querying language, enhanced documentation, and smoother initial setup.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogLogic is known for a smooth setup process and responsive customer support. Devo, while praised for its powerful deployment capabilities, receives mixed reviews regarding the ease of initial setup, with efficient but less accessible customer service.

Pricing and ROI: LogLogic is favored for its cost-effective setup and solid ROI, making it suitable for budget-conscious buyers. Devo, with a higher upfront investment, delivers substantial ROI through advanced capabilities, which many users deem worth the additional cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. LogLogic Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. LogLogic

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,351 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

LogLogic

Ranking in Log Management

50th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

47th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LogLogic is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
LogLogic	1.0%
Other	97.6%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

it_user126030

Senior ICT Solutions Expert at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

I've evaluated Splunk and IBM Q1 but LogLogic is the best choice for log management. SIEM functionality needs improvement.

If you are searching for log management solution, LogLogic is probably the best choice. The SIEM functionality is not at that level, and I suggest instead to choose another SIEM solution (eg: IBM Q1). In my experience, a good practice is to separate log management from SIEM in a way that they are two separate systems.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"It's a core tool for us in looking at logs, because logs are the starting point in any investigation, so leveraging Devo from start to finish in any investigation is basically what we do."

"I'm so happy with the platform."

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

"Overall, Devo is awesome, but it's got some room to grow."

"It centralizes security management within a business, functioning as a core system for a SOC."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

More Devo pros

"Having logs in a central location helps with troubleshooting, forensic investigations, and legal investigations."

"If you are searching for log management solution, LogLogic is probably the best choice."

Cons

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"The customer service is average. Technical support from Devo is helpful, but they can improve on the support model."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"One major area for improvement for Devo... is to provide more capabilities around pre-built monitoring. They're working on integrations with different types of systems, but that integration needs to go beyond just onboarding to the platform. It needs to include applications, out-of-the-box, that immediately help people to start monitoring their systems. Such applications would include dashboards and alerts, and then people could customize them for their own needs so that they aren't starting from a blank slate."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet."

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

More Devo cons

"Customer Service: On a scale of 1-5, 0. They say the right things but don't deliver when it counts."

"Definitely SIEM – other vendors have gone a lot further in developing SIEM functionality and made a lot more in this area."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

20%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs LogLogic

Compared 10% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs LogLogic

Compared 10% of the time

QAX SIEM vs LogLogic

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs LogLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Adlumin Security Operations vs LogLogic

Compared 2% of the time

More LogLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

September 2026

Download LogLogic product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

LogLogic specializes in log management, offering robust solutions for businesses that require comprehensive log collection and analysis capabilities. Its scalable architecture supports IT infrastructures by providing valuable insights into system operations and security.

LogLogic empowers businesses by focusing on log data collection, retention, and analysis. It equips enterprises with the ability to aggregate and normalize logs across distributed environments, improving response times and compliance adherence. By supporting seamless integration into existing IT processes, LogLogic provides visibility and actionable intelligence for security and operations teams.

What are the main features of LogLogic?

Log Aggregation: Centralizes log data from diverse sources, simplifying data management and analysis.
Real-Time Analysis: Allows for immediate identification of potential security events and operational issues.
Compliance Reporting: Provides pre-built and customizable reports to meet regulatory requirements effectively.
Scalability: Adapts to the changing size and needs of growing enterprises.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Users report improved detection and response capabilities against security threats.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines IT operations by automating log collection and reporting processes.
Cost Effectiveness: Reduces manual effort and resources required for log management, yielding financial returns.

LogLogic finds applications in industries such as finance and healthcare, where compliance and security are paramount. By leveraging its capabilities, financial institutions gain insights into transaction anomalies and cyber threats. Healthcare providers use LogLogic for maintaining compliance with health data regulations, enhancing patient data protection.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Astrium, Cerner, Children's Hospital, Effiage, Lavego, Plantronics, Skipton Building Society, The Body Shop, The Lowry, University of Manitoba

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. LogLogic

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. LogLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. LogLogic and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,351 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. LogLogic report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.