No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Detectify vs Nucleus Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 23, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Detectify
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
33rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Attack Surface Management (ASM) (37th)
Nucleus Security
Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (40th), Vulnerability Management (54th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Detectify is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nucleus Security is 3.4%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nucleus Security3.4%
Detectify0.7%
Other95.9%
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Detectify?
Leave a review
reviewer2850051 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cyber Security Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Unified vulnerability data has transformed risk prioritization and optimized remediation effort
The best features that Nucleus Security offers in my experience are the unified integrations with all of the different vulnerability management platforms. It is helping quite a lot to unify all of that. It also offers good prioritization based on the EPSS or the CVSS score, as well as different other factors including Mandiant threat intelligence and similar aspects. It helps bring it all into one big picture instead of different silos of vulnerabilities. The integrations make my job easier because I can connect my other tools, which is the most important part of this tool to bring in all the vulnerabilities from the different other tools. The prioritization changed it from chasing vulnerabilities or pushing colleagues to patch vulnerabilities to providing colleagues with their vulnerabilities and requesting remediation and patching. Nucleus Security positively impacts my organization by bringing awareness to vulnerability management since we can actually determine how many vulnerabilities we have and how critical the risk is, or we can quantify the risk overall for the company.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
900,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nucleus Security?
I have a good experience with that, so we don't have much problem dealing with pricing, setup, and licensing.
What needs improvement with Nucleus Security?
I think it can be improved by making it more practical, integrated, and easier for teams to apply in real-world workflow from a healthcare perspective. The main improvements I can see right now are...
What is your primary use case for Nucleus Security?
I have been using Nucleus Security for the past few years in my company, particularly in the healthcare field.I use Nucleus Security especially for understanding radiation safety, nuclear medicine,...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Horizon3.ai, Tenable and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: May 2026.
900,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.