We performed a comparison between Denodo and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Denodo is very stable."
"This solution provides us with the ability to sync data, and make it available for anyone to use across the business."
"Denodo is lightweight in terms of how it leads you to combine your discrete data systems at one spot."
"Access to numerous forums and internet information."
"The performance and the speed to market are the most valuable features of this solution."
"In PL/SQL, first you need to gather all the data and then start writing the file, but in Denodo you fetch the data and write the data simultaneously. So, for example, if you have 1 million or 2 million records, you don't have to wait to fetch all of the 2 million; you can keep on fetching and writing in the file simultaneously."
"It is a go-to tool for data virtualization. The virtualization and data catalog are the features of why we chose Denodo."
"Overall, the product works quite well and has a good set of features."
"I am impressed with the tool's possibility of integrating different systems in a unified place."
"When we are replicating data between similar databases then it is straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"The replication of the data table is one of the best features."
"You can use Oracle GoldenGate as a DR for your system."
"GoldenGate can connect and collect data from multiple sources, such as SQL Server."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature is data replication capability."
"We can't scale it to meet digital requirements."
"I would like it if we could pull the data model or export the data model because Denodo has, based on how you build, something called associations. The data model gets very confusing when you go look at it. It depends on how you define it, but it's really huge. I wish there was a way to export it into Visio. It could be that they already have a way to do it, and I don't know, but it would be much easier for the architects and even for the developers to look at it than scrunching it into the screen and expanding every small portion of it. If there was an easy way to export the Denodo model into another modeling tool and view it, it would be great."
"The support is not the best and should be improved."
"The feature that you have to connect on LDAP needs improvement."
"The integration could use improvement, it's a lot of non-speed line processes that we have discovered, in the country. The configurations could use a lot more improvement."
"I would like to see a connectivity option with third-party apps, for example, JDBC, and ODBC drivers. Currently, we need to install it separately from the Denodo side and then connect it."
"I would like to see a proper way to avoid killing the sourcing systems."
"Tasks such as conversion of a date format or conversion of a number format that can be done in a very easy way in different languages, like SQL or Oracle, are not so easy to do in Denodo. For example, if you want to convert a date from one format to another, in Oracle it's pretty easy; in Denodo, however, it requires so many lines of code. Simple things that can be done very quickly in other database languages require more lines of code in Denodo."
"Microservices Architecture is not user-friendly."
"Additional performance metrics should be added and visible in a dashboard, displayed in a detailed manner."
"GoldenGate is expensive. It's costly because this solution is unique in our market. The GoldenGate Cloud Service is cheaper than the on-premise solution."
"There are a lot of bugs in the solution."
"IBM CDC has one central control while Oracle GoldenGate has two controls. In IBM CDC we can do all things in frontend. The solution needs to incorporate a feature where we can connect it to a standby database."
"Some issues regarding stability need to be resolved."
"Troubleshooting issues is not always the easiest. It should be easier to troubleshoot. Their support can also be improved. They don't read your problem statement and waste a lot of time. GoldenGate for big data is actually a separate license. It is sort of a separate product, but it might fall underneath your GoldenGate category. If we're talking about big data, its interaction with big data sources is poorly documented."
"I would like to see the interface more graphical and easier to use."
Denodo is ranked 12th in Data Integration with 29 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Denodo is rated 7.8, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Denodo is most compared with Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Delphix, Informatica PowerCenter and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). See our Denodo vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.