Delinea Runtime Authorization vs Opal comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Delinea and Opal Security are both solutions in the Access Management category. Delinea is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Opal Security is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.7. Delinea holds a 0.9% mindshare in AM, compared to Opal Security’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Delinea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Opal Security users who would recommend it.

Delinea Runtime Authorization

Read 11 Delinea Runtime Authorization reviews

2,769 Views
803 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Opal

Read 3 Opal reviews

1,553 Views
652 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Delinea Runtime Authorization

Opal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2026

Delinea Runtime Authorization and Opal are competing products in the access management solutions category. Opal appears to hold the upper hand due to its advanced features, although Delinea offers favorable pricing and support.

Features: Delinea Runtime Authorization focuses on dynamic access control, seamless integration with existing systems, and simplified management interfaces. Opal provides real-time authorization insights, robust data protection mechanisms, and a comprehensive analytics engine. These features make Opal's environment appealing for enterprises with complex authorization needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Delinea is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive support team, facilitating rapid integration. Opal's deployment is more complex but is balanced by extensive documentation and specialized support. Although Delinea ensures faster setup, Opal's detailed guidance and dedicated assistance are beneficial for navigating intricate implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Delinea Runtime Authorization offers a competitive setup cost, resulting in a quicker ROI due to its lower initial investment. Opal has a higher upfront cost but delivers value through its expansive features and security benefits, justifying the investment for some customers. Despite Delinea's attractive pricing, Opal's comprehensive capabilities can lead to long-term value and enhanced ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Delinea Runtime Authorization vs. Opal Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Delinea Runtime Authorization vs. Opal

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,336 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Delinea Runtime Authorization

Ranking in Access Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (5th)

Opal

Ranking in Access Management

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (10th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Delinea Runtime Authorization is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Opal is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
StrongDM	0.9%
Opal	0.9%
Other	98.2%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

AmitRathod

Senior Analyst at Toll Holdings Limited

Secure access has transformed our audits and weekend operations run smoothly

StrongDM does not support multi-port and distributed clusters, as the raw TCP resource type is strictly single-port and cannot handle protocols requiring multiple concurrent ports or distributed brokers like Kafka. Third-party client compatibility is another area for improvement, as StrongDM is designed to work with the standard Microsoft Remote Desktop Connection on Windows but may not fully support alternative RDP clients like the Windows Store Remote Desktop.Additionally, StrongDM has limited MFA and passwordless options, relying heavily on time-based one-time passwords (OTP) or Duo, lacking support for true passwordless setups like biometrics or hardware YubiKeys, and it does not support per-session MFA. These are the drawbacks that need improvement for StrongDM.

Read full review

Mohammed Mudasser

AI/ML Engineer at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated access reviews have improved least privilege and simplified identity governance

The best features Opal offers are automated access reviews, centralized visibility, and just-in-time access. I especially appreciate the ability to enforce time-bound access and automatically revoke privileges, which makes least privilege management much more practical. The automated access reviews have made the process much more efficient by giving us a structured way to review and revoke unnecessary permissions. Instead of manually checking every entitlement, we can focus on exceptions and higher risk access, which makes the review process more manageable and consistent. I would also add that the context Opal provides during access reviews is valuable. You can see the access relationship and risk rather than simply approving or denying it blindly. This makes the decisions more informed and gives the team a much better audit trail.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"StrongDM positively impacts our organization in many ways, mainly in cost savings from the time saved, and it has significantly improved both security and operational efficiency for us."

"StrongDM positively impacts my organization by helping with compliance and audit functions."

"Since using StrongDM, I estimate around a 60% reduction in effort compared to other PAM tools."

"We primarily used StrongDM for access to resources on private networks like EC2 machines, Kubernetes clusters, and various databases."

"I absolutely would say that the best features of StrongDM and what I appreciate about the solution is that time to onboard is absolutely minimal."

"StrongDM has positively impacted my organization by ensuring that every developer has access to cloud resources, which are audited by the organization, allowing us to keep track of who accesses what and control the access."

"The best features in StrongDM are the password rotation capabilities, which I think are pretty cool, and also how you can literally log in to any of the privileged servers through a single platform."

"The best features in StrongDM are that it is the easiest product in the market for this situation with easy access."

More Delinea Runtime Authorization pros

"Opal has positively impacted my organization by reducing stress and increasing effectiveness for all our employees; it works better so all our employees have more time to sleep and they can investigate more."

"The clearest outcome I have seen is less manual effort during access reviews and better control over unnecessary or standing access, which improves the overall security posture."

"Previously, my phone usage was around nine hours and fifteen minutes or more, but it has significantly reduced to around six hours and thirty minutes to seven hours, meaning two and a half to three hours has been reduced after using Opal as my primary screen time blocker."

Cons

"Integration, however, is something which admins configure with StrongDM, and in that area, it can be improved."

"We've had a few issues with the stability of this product in the past."

"Additionally, StrongDM has limited MFA and passwordless options, relying heavily on time-based one-time passwords (OTP) or Duo, lacking support for true passwordless setups like biometrics or hardware YubiKeys, and it does not support per-session MFA."

"I think StrongDM could improve by focusing more on network device management by allowing the addition of PAM for network devices, managing legacy network equipment, or helping to initiate enterprise onboarding where a lot of complex environments and initial setup are required."

"StrongDM lacks the capability for web application injections or password injections, so we need to rely on other tools such as HashiCorp for non-human accounts or DevOps scenarios."

"I rate the stability of the product five out of ten because crashes sometimes happen when we are working on it."

"My thoughts on the pricing of StrongDM is that it is expensive."

"StrongDM lacks the capability for web application injections or password injections, so we need to rely on other tools such as HashiCorp for non-human accounts or DevOps scenarios."

More Delinea Runtime Authorization cons

"Opal can be improved in some ways."

"The core platform is already strong, but I would appreciate more flexibility in customizing workflows and access review policies."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is per user per month."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Educational Organization

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for StrongDM?

I cannot disclose the pricing details, but I find it competitive compared to other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with StrongDM?

StrongDM can be improved in many ways. For example, the access approval workflow could be faster. We face a challenge where we sometimes need temporary access to production but have to wait for an ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for StrongDM?

In our environment, we have managed Linux servers, cloud resources, and production systems, and we use StrongDM as a privileged access management solution. StrongDM authenticates users through the ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Opal?

The paid version is a little costly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Opal?

The core platform is already strong, but I would appreciate more flexibility in customizing workflows and access review policies. Better reporting and analytics around access trends and risk would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opal?

The main case I am using Opal is for identity and access governance, particularly managing application access and enforcing least privilege policies. I use it to streamline access requests, approva...

See all answers

Comparisons

Endpoint Privilege Manager vs Delinea Runtime Authorization

Compared 13% of the time

KeeperPAM vs Delinea Runtime Authorization

Compared 12% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Delinea Runtime Authorization

Compared 12% of the time

Okta Platform vs Delinea Runtime Authorization

Compared 9% of the time

Teleport vs Delinea Runtime Authorization

Compared 7% of the time

More Delinea Runtime Authorization Competitors

Okta Platform vs Opal

Compared 17% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Opal

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Opal

Compared 11% of the time

ConductorOne vs Opal

Compared 10% of the time

Idira IGA vs Opal

Compared 9% of the time

More Opal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Delinea Runtime Authorization

October 2026

Download Delinea Runtime Authorization product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

October 2026

Download Opal product report

Overview

Delinea Runtime Authorization offers advanced privileged access management with features like session logging and centralized access management, ensuring secure and efficient operations.

Designed for environments requiring secure privileged access, Delinea Runtime Authorization centralizes session logging and audit trails, integrates with SSO and MFA, and supports just-in-time access without credential exposure. It enhances security and compliance with seamless deployment across cloud environments, inheriting role-based controls and self-service options. Despite potential improvements needed in reporting, setup complexity, and integrations, it remains integral for managing secure access to servers, databases, and Kubernetes clusters.

What are the key features of Delinea Runtime Authorization?

Session Logging: Captures and records sessions for security and auditing.
Audit Trail: Provides detailed logs to track user activity and access.
Centralized Access Management: Unifies control over user access across platforms.
Just-in-Time Access: Offers temporary access without exposing credentials.
Integration with SSO and MFA: Enhances authentication with existing systems.
Session Replay: Facilitates security incident analysis and troubleshooting.
Credential-less Access: Reduces risk by eliminating exposed credentials.
Role-Based Controls: Assigns access based on user roles for tailored security.
Self-Service Options: Empowers users with on-demand access capabilities.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Security: Reducing exposure to shared credentials and untracked admin access.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlining workflows through automation and centralized controls.
Compliance Assurance: Supporting compliance with standards like SOC 2 and ISO 27001.
Deployment Simplicity: Seamless integration with cloud environments and secret management.
Comprehensive Audit Trails: Enhancing accountability and visibility into user actions.

Used extensively in industries like finance, healthcare, and technology, Delinea Runtime Authorization helps manage privileged access by eliminating shared credentials and ensuring secure access across infrastructures. It supports compliance needs and enhances security for remote access management, particularly for environments requiring stringent security measures and efficient operational processes.

Delinea

Opal is a comprehensive platform for identity access management and compliance automation. It excels in streamlining access control, audit preparation, and compliance tracking. Key features include an intuitive interface, robust security measures, and real-time collaboration, significantly improving organizational efficiency and productivity.

Opal Security

Buyer's Guide

Delinea Runtime Authorization vs. Opal

September 2026

Free Report: Delinea Runtime Authorization vs. Opal

Find out what your peers are saying about Delinea Runtime Authorization vs. Opal and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,336 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Delinea Runtime Authorization vs. Opal report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.