We performed a comparison between DbVisualizer and Redgate SQL Toolbelt based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management."Actions like exporting grids to Excel or other tools is a very easy task."
"Timed queries that add their result to the result grid for every execution are helpful."
"It is easy to track the reports, this is what is most valuable for me."
"The most valuable feature is SQL Search."
"One thing I would like to see changed is having the JDBC drivers in a fixed location outside of the application package."
"Sometimes, I feel that the startup time takes a bit more time than needed."
"I would like to see the bandwidth increase allowing me to easily analyze more data."
"The biggest problem with the Redgate SQL Toolbelt is just how heavy it is; it seems to take a lot of resources."
DbVisualizer is ranked 24th in Database Development and Management while Redgate SQL Toolbelt is ranked 7th in Database Development and Management. DbVisualizer is rated 9.6, while Redgate SQL Toolbelt is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DbVisualizer writes "Good for monitoring specific processes, built-in SSH tunneling support, easy-to-create graphs, and a clean GUI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Redgate SQL Toolbelt writes "SQL Search and change automation functionality help us manage our code repository and databases". DbVisualizer is most compared with Toad for Oracle, whereas Redgate SQL Toolbelt is most compared with Quest Spotlight, DBmaestro Database Source Control, IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server, SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer and Devart dotConnect.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
