No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DBLab Engine vs Gophish comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DBLab Engine
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
114th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Gophish
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the AWS Marketplace category, the mindshare of DBLab Engine is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Gophish is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Gophish0.2%
DBLab Engine0.2%
Other99.6%
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2845797 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a transportation company with 51-200 employees
Rapid database cloning has accelerated realistic testing but initial setup still needs simplification
I only used DBLab Engine for a while, but I already see many benefits. I can think of applications not only in the hackathon, but we can also probably do some black-box monitoring, set up some simulation environments, and I think it is very helpful to have this kind of automatic testing to ensure that whenever our new feature is delivered, there are no regressions. In my experience, the absolute best feature of DBLab Engine is the thin cloning capability driven by copy-on-write technology. Being able to provide a full-size production-scale database clone in just a few seconds, regardless of whether the underlying database is tens of gigabytes or multiple terabytes, is a massive game-changer for engineering velocity. I really would to try more. The complete environment isolation is also very fantastic. I have noticed that the thin cloning and environmental isolation of DBLab Engine have dramatically accelerated our development lifecycle and improved overall code quality, even in a hackathon. Before utilizing this, setting up a realistic test database was a major bottleneck. Developers either had to share a single staging database or spend hours trying to seed a local database with a thin, representative subset of mock data. With DBLab Engine, we achieved complete workflow interdependence, which was incredibly helpful.
JC
Administrador de sistemas informaticos en red at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Phishing awareness campaigns have improved training impact but still need smarter automation
I think Gophish could be improved with more automation, for instance. It is great that you can create templates, schedule them, and do everything you want in Gophish, but it would be nice to have a small integrated AI model with which you could create email templates and phishing templates. It would be nice if Gophish implemented artificial intelligence. I wish Gophish could provide more support and be more advanced and that they continue developing it because it seems that Gophish does not get many updates, and I think they need to implement more features. It is great because it is free, but it needs more features. It would be cool if there was an artificial intelligence model that could create phishing campaigns or templates or email templates for you integrated within Gophish. I would rate it a seven. It is quite good and free software, but it needs more substance. It also depends on the number of clients a company has; it may be necessary to launch Gophish in a staggered way, which I also think is a drawback Gophish has. The issue is that if there are many people being targeted, for example, 5,000 employees in a company and you send 5,000, it may be that sending so many messages gets blocked by the security systems companies have. I think that Gophish could also improve the message sending flows. I gave it a seven because there are things to improve and it is not perfect. As I said before, it would be nice if templates could be created with AI, integrated into Gophish using an API with Gemini or ChatGPT or whichever, but the point is that it would be nice if the sending flows at large scale were better managed. When you send a phishing campaign to 5,000 people, you have to send it in sections in a staggered way, for example: to these 5,000 people it is going to be sent between eight in the morning and four in the afternoon. If you send them all at once, the phishing may get blocked and then the campaign has no effect. I would like it if Gophish implemented more improvements because they are needed, as it is kind of a bit stagnant. I hope that in the future they add more improvements including creating personalized templates with artificial intelligence and improving the message sending flows.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In my experience, the absolute best feature of DBLab Engine is the thin cloning capability driven by copy-on-write technology."
"For PostgreSQL, DBLab Engine is the best tool where we can write the queries, develop the query, and also test that query."
"I would say not to think twice and to use Gophish; it is a good tool with excellent features and a good dashboard, so there is no reason to keep looking elsewhere."
"Gophish is one of the easiest tools that I can see available online, and a significant advantage is that it is free of cost and open source."
"Gophish has positively impacted my organization by increasing awareness among my employees."
"The impact it has had is that we have been able to sell it to clients who, for example, do not have the money to pay for a platform because they are small startups, and so with Gophish we create a solution that is cheaper for them."
"Gophish has had a positive impact on my organization because it is open source, so it is free."
"The best feature that Gophish offers is its customizability; it makes everything look very professional and makes tracking very easy."
"Regarding my use of Gophish in this academic context, I found it extremely easy to use; you do not need to be a technical person with special skills to be able to handle it."
"Gophish has really improved security awareness in my organization."
 

Cons

"Additionally, the initial configuration and infrastructure setup is a bit complicated, so more documentation would be a good addition to have."
"As a beginner, there were some challenges we faced to learn the UI design and the interface, so making it more user-friendly and beginner-friendly would be beneficial."
"I do not really have any improvements in mind at the moment, but offering ready-made templates that we could use or examples of emails that we could directly use would be beneficial."
"I think Gophish could be improved with a user-level function, meaning if the person is strong or weak, we send more or fewer awareness emails, and rely on real attacks in order to be able to create a template by itself."
"It does not handle lists well either, so when you have a big list of email addresses or users, it crashes, perhaps in the sending of the emails or somewhere else, but it crashes."
"Although the tool is very good, I think there could be some improvements, especially when it comes to leveraging AI for testing and also when it comes to the expansion beyond email phishing."
"I would rate it a seven. It is quite good and free software, but it needs more substance."
"The one improvement I would like to see in Gophish is the booting up of the images, as it sometimes takes a lot of time and could be improved."
"The customer support needs improvement."
"Gophish can be improved by adding more languages and maybe a web version for it, a SaaS platform."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
64%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
Insurance Company
7%
Construction Company
26%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DBLab Engine?
I think DBLab Engine offers excellent flexibility when it comes to pricing and license because the core engine, I believe, is open-source. The initial cost to experiment with it during the hackatho...
What needs improvement with DBLab Engine?
As a beginner, there were some challenges we faced to learn the UI design and the interface, so making it more user-friendly and beginner-friendly would be beneficial. We can add more functionality...
What is your primary use case for DBLab Engine?
I have been using DBLab Engine for the last six months. We are using DBLab Engine to speed up and write PostgreSQL queries, testing, and database processes, improving our queries, PostgreSQL develo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gophish?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing shows that the setup cost is not very high; Gophish is completely free, as it is an open-source tool.
What needs improvement with Gophish?
I believe Gophish can be improved in a few areas. First, the user interface could be made more modern and beginner-friendly. The current setup is simple, but for a new user, campaign creation, land...
What is your primary use case for Gophish?
My main use case for Gophish is to run a phishing awareness campaign inside an organization in a safe and controlled way. For example, instead of waiting for a real attacker to send a fake email to...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about DBLab Engine vs. Gophish and other solutions. Updated: July 2026.
909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.