No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DataDome vs Link11 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DataDome
Ranking in Bot Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
3.4
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
AI Security (19th)
Link11
Ranking in Bot Management
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
CDN (19th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (35th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (23rd), API Security (22nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Bot Management category, the mindshare of DataDome is 8.0%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Link11 is 8.6%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Bot Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
DataDome8.0%
Link118.6%
Other83.4%
Bot Management
 

Featured Reviews

Arka Sarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
Real-time bot defense has protected telecom APIs and now keeps customer logins secure
While DataDome performs very well overall, there are a few areas where improvements would make it even more effective in a telecom environment. One point is better handling of false positives. Although it is generally very accurate, in some cases, legitimate users or internal systems get flagged, especially corporate VPN users, internal testing tools, and partner integrations. The improvement would be a more granular and easier whitelisting mechanism and better transparency on why a request was blocked. Another point is more detailed analytics and custom reporting. The current dashboards are good, but sometimes detailed analysis is limited. Custom reporting options are not very flexible. As part of improvement, more customizable dashboards can be made, along with the ability to create business-specific reports, for each API and per region. Better visibility for API-level protection can also be developed. The protection works well, but debugging blocked API requests can take time and is not always easy to trace the exact reason for blocking, thus requiring more detailed logs and traceability for API traffic, along with easier correlation with backend systems. The integration with the existing security ecosystem can also be improved.
SS
Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna
Offers flexibility with a kill switch for bypassing Reblaze if needed and provides a reliable Layer 7 defense against attacks
There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town. AWS WAF, the Web Application Firewall from AWS, has a vast database of bad IP addresses due to its long-standing presence in this business. Reblaze, being a new entrant, is still building its database of bad IP addresses and malicious systems. So, Reblaze needs to work on that aspect. But other than that, I don't think scaling Reblaze has been an issue. There were some initial glitches, but they were all sorted out. So currently, I would say that the bot management and the database are areas they should focus on for further improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The biggest positive impact of using DataDome has been stability, efficiency, and trust in our traffic all at the same time."
"The most valuable feature of DataDome is the traffic analysis."
"The main improvements have been better protection, reduced operational noise, improved system stability, and lower manual effort in handling bot-related incidents."
"After implementing DataDome, we observed measurable improvements across security, performance, and user experience."
"Reblaze knows how to manage security. For me as, someone who knows little about security, it's good that I have a firm that optimizes everything according to their standards. It's their responsibility and they are fully hands-on."
"Reblaze has definitely saved us money; we have estimated that it saves up to €500,000 a year."
"The technical support is quite good, as soon as you have an issue you call or send an email and they respond very quickly, and they also provide you with contact details of the CEO."
"Reblaze has saved us money by optimizing server usage and blocking malicious bots."
"It is a highly resilient product that can handle significantly larger workloads and high volumes of traffic with ease."
"Provides mobile app security."
"The most valuable features were the real-time monitoring and the management. With this kind of product, you need a very good management system to allow you to see false positives in real-time; to see what's happening in real-time... The clarity stood out. It was very visible and very easy to navigate; very easy to find the data we were looking for."
"Reblaze provides us with a solution we can count on."
 

Cons

"With DataDome, the biggest friction points we experienced were mostly around tuning and visibility during the early phase."
"While DataDome performs very well overall, there are a few areas where improvements would make it even more effective in a telecom environment."
"DataDome does not catch legitimate IPs during traffic analysis, even when the traffic exceeds the threshold value."
"Needed improvements could focus on specific aspects that impact my workflow, enabling even more streamlined processes."
"They have an interface that you have to adjust to. That is a bit of a downfall because I expect an interface to be very intuitive for someone who knows little about security. But if you know about security, the interface is wonderful."
"Up to now the only cons I could find is sometimes getting change management back on track, because it's a company that evolves, and sometimes I don't have the same needs that they have. But besides that, up until now, I am really pleased with their service and I've also recommended them to some of my clients."
"I would like to have seen more automated reports. Maybe it has been improved in the last year and I'm just not aware of it. But from a managerial point of view, you want a summary report, a weekly report: How many attacks were blocked? How much bandwidth was saved due to the caching mechanism? What were the top-ten attacks that were tested on the network, etc? I could most likely have found all that data if I logged in to the system and ran different reports. It would be very helpful to get a management report on a weekly basis."
"Some of the settings on the dashboard are confusing."
"Perhaps the automatic reporting could be better. I would like to have seen more automated reports."
"It would be beneficial if it had a workflow or a feature that could fine-tune settings based on high-level requirements."
"There is room for improvement in helping us understanding session management... We want Reblaze to catch and identify everything. We want to see the various devices doing one activity and to see, in a timeline, what's happened. We would like to see a more human-readable display to understand what's happening in the web app."
"The interface on the dashboard could be improved. Some of the settings are confusing which makes things difficult when you're trying to get a handle on the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We found the cost to be a bit on the higher side, starting at approximately three to four thousand dollars for a small configuration."
"On a monthly basis we pay $750."
"There is still some room for improvement when it comes to bot management from Reblaze because they are relatively new compared to other vendors in the town."
"I believe that for the six instances we have right now, it's costing us $16,000 per month."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Bot Management solutions are best for your needs.
903,182 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Educational Organization
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DataDome?
While DataDome performs very well overall, there are a few areas where improvements would make it even more effective in a telecom environment. One point is better handling of false positives. Alth...
What is your primary use case for DataDome?
In my organization, the primary use case of DataDome is end-to-end observability across telecom applications and infrastructure, especially for real-time network services and customer-facing system...
What advice do you have for others considering DataDome?
I believe I have added enough information. The most valuable feature for our organization is DataDome's real-time bot detection and mitigation. Since our applications like login and recharge APIs a...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

DataDome Bot Protect with Agent Trust
Reblaze
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rakuten, TripAdvisor, Adevinta, Classmates, BlaBlaCar, Veepee, ...
CBC, Hermes, Gartner
Find out what your peers are saying about DataDome vs. Link11 and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
903,182 professionals have used our research since 2012.