Cynet vs Varonis Platform comparison

Cynet and Varonis are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. Cynet is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8, while Varonis is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Cynet holds a 4.8% mindshare in UBA, compared to Varonis’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Cynet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Varonis users who would recommend it.

Cynet

Read 44 Cynet reviews

7,020 Views
632 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Varonis Platform

Read 14 Varonis Platform reviews

9,196 Views
460 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Cynet

Varonis Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 7, 2025

Cynet and Varonis Platform are prominent competitors in the cybersecurity domain. Cynet tends to have an advantage due to its ease of deployment and comprehensive automation, which are beneficial for organizations with smaller teams.

Features: Cynet provides user behavior analysis, deception capabilities, and extensive automation for small teams. It also offers advanced detection and rapid deployment, enhancing network visibility for remote environments. Varonis Platform focuses on data access governance, sensitive data identification, and monitoring. It excels in enhancing data security and compliance through robust data governance features.

Room for Improvement: Cynet requires better mobile device support, enhanced reporting functionality, and improved false positive management. There is also a need for better integration and customization options. Varonis could improve in cloud integration, calculation engine speed, and DLP capabilities. Users find its GUI challenging and permission requirements for core functions cumbersome.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cynet shines with flexible cloud support, allowing seamless hybrid environment integration, paired with 24/7 real-time support. Varonis, though strong in on-premises solutions, faces challenges with adopting cloud solutions. Cynet's customer service is proactive but could improve in ticket response times, whereas Varonis has limited local support presence.

Pricing and ROI: Cynet is competitively priced with flexible licensing options, offering good ROI due to automation that reduces monitoring needs. Its comprehensive feature set often results in cost savings. Varonis may seem expensive with module-specific licenses and higher maintenance fees but proves valuable in data governance, appealing less to small to mid-tier companies.

To learn more, read our detailed Cynet vs. Varonis Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cynet vs. Varonis Platform

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cynet

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

3rd

Ranking in Ransomware Protection

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (11th), Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (16th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (13th), Threat Deception Platforms (3rd), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (5th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)

Varonis Platform

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

6th

Ranking in Ransomware Protection

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (20th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (9th), Data Governance (4th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (18th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (12th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (5th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (3rd), Compliance Management (7th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of Cynet is 4.8%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Varonis Platform is 5.0%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cynet	4.8%
Varonis Platform	5.0%
Other	90.2%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Suhas Dalvi

CoFounder at Vinca Cybertech Pvt. Ltd.

Comprehensive protection with minimal false positives enhances threat management

Cynet's real-time threat detection has helped reduce risks for our organization overall. Cynet's centralized control feature is very user-friendly, has a good user interface, and is very convenient, requiring hardly one or two people to manage the entire console, which is not resource-heavy and automates many processes, making it very easy to use without alert fatigue due to low false positives. Autonomous Breach Protection has helped us mitigate threats proactively by being highly automated, requiring very few people to manage it for forensics and investigation due to its low false positive rate, which is less than 1.3%, and it doesn't consume much memory, making it light on the endpoints. Cynet is the only platform in the industry in the endpoint XDR that meets all steps of the MITRE ATT&CK framework, scoring on all 143 odd steps, with a false positive rate of less than 1.3%. Cynet's machine learning algorithms are very effective in adapting to new threats.

Read full review

Frederic Delos

Senior Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Offers the ability to identify sensitive areas, allowing you to drill down into the sensitive data

The most effective feature for me is its ability to identify sensitive areas, allowing you to drill down into the sensitive data, provided you have access, to determine whether it's a false positive or a true positive. That's the best thing for me, out of all of it. It's got everything, like other ones, but I like to be able to look at something if I'm doing forensics on the alert and say, "Okay, do I really need to do something with this?" For example, we don't want sensitive data in our OneDrive. So it identifies the sensitive data that's possibly in the OneDrive. And what I can do is look at it and identify whether it's actually sensitive data in Datalert or whether it looks like sensitive data, but I know it's a false positive. If it is a false positive, I can basically say ignore this pattern based on X, Y, and Z, you know, whether it's Redjax or keyword proximity. So I like that. With other tools, I gotta go through a whole process because it's a little bit more complex. Here, I can tag it and bag it in one shot. And the next good time I scan, it slips over it. So it helps in that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interface is exceptionally clear and easy to understand."

"It can be deployed in autonomous mode, and then it automatically blocks malware threats."

"We are using almost all of the features and we find it quite good overall."

"The initial setup is very fast and very easy."

"The visibility it gives is excellent."

"Cynet's most valuable features are laptop and server performance, internal network monitoring, and external firewall lock management."

"The product did not utilize much memory or resources from the background, which was a significant advantage."

"The feature I find most valuable, is the reality graphical user interface."

More Cynet pros

"The 24/7 support is the most valuable feature. They have been able to answer support questions pretty quickly."

"It can easily identify unusual behavior or access patterns that may pose a potential threat, while operating as a unified reporting system."

"I also appreciate the reporting feature, which allows for the extraction of various reports based on specific needs. These reports can be used for audit purposes, such as tracking changes in file locations or deletions."

"The analytics would have to be our most valuable feature."

"The solution's classification engine is highly configurable and efficient."

"On the Varonis side, technical support is phenomenal. Their ability to explain is very good, and they seem to be very knowledgeable. When I get an alert that doesn't quite make sense, they dive in there and kind of take me through it. That's very useful and very good. There are some false alerts, but it is better to have a false alert than no alert at all."

"There's also a 90-day policy where if a user is not using the warehouse, it will automatically delete that username."

"That alerting and reporting service is great."

More Varonis Platform pros

Cons

"Their deployment needs some work, especially with integration with remote monitoring management systems like Datto AutoTask or ConnectWise Automate."

"They have automated response capability, and they're moving more and more into SOAR capability. They have built-in deception technology with host-file users, phantoms, etc. We used to call them honeypots. So, they're on target. They're doing a really good job, and they should continue to improve with SOAR."

"One thing to note is that I highly recommend adding a deep learning-based prevention environment as an additional layer to Cynet. However, I always advise my customers to start with Cynet or XDR, for example, and then focus on the people, technology, and processes involved. This is the best approach to ensure that you are not breached with ransomware. While Cynet can prevent most attacks, there have been cases where ransomware has been quicker than Cynet's detection capabilities. In these situations, an additional tool is necessary to ensure complete protection, and that is what I sell as well."

"Having a DLP feature would add value"

"They have some things in the pipeline, we understand, and they're going to be able to support Android and all these other devices soon. The key is the devices - which is an aspect that is lacking right now. Every company has that problem, not just Cynet."

"In future releases, I would like to see cloud security aspects included."

"Previously, we used Cynet, but transitioned to Trend Micro due to the lack of complete SSO services, which were costly."

"Most of their times are in Greenwich Mean Time. I would like to see more local time zones."

More Cynet cons

"It is significantly complex."

"The product is very complicated."

"For unstructured data monitoring, it's one of the top ones, if not the top one, due to its usability."

"Varonis requires more access permissions for its core functions compared to competitors, which can be a concern for companies about data safety."

"The remediation process can be improved. There will be no existing permission group for the McAfee channel domains. We can create a new permissions group for the required folder."

"The GUI should be more functional. There should be a process for connecting through Chrome, Internet Explorer, etc."

"The solution's interface is a little complicated with regard to setting up filters and reports."

More Varonis Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company's customers have to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs of the solution. Cynet is not expensive."

"The licensing for Cynet is yearly. The solution pricing depends on the customer, but it is not very expensive."

"Cynet is cheap."

"It is extremely affordable. I'll give it a five out of five in terms of price. It was half the cost of the next closest competitor, and the competitor didn't provide SOC services."

"This solution is expensive. I would rate the price as a three out of five when compared to similar products."

"Cynet is cheaper than other solutions in the market."

"The pricing was good."

"The price is very competitive."

More Cynet pricing and cost advice

"Varonis Platform wasn't certainly the cheapest solution."

"It's expensive, kind of, really expensive."

"The pricing is good. It neither expensive nor cheap. It is average."

"I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."

"You could do a subscription, where you pay yearly, or you could purchase it outright. The licensing cost is based on the number of users on the system that you are monitoring."

"Licensing is on an annual basis. Maintenance and renewal fees are separate. Varonis Datalert is quite expensive."

"The platform is expensive. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

When evaluating User Activity Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

The support team that stands behind the detection and response. Is there adequate expertise and are they behind you 24x7x365? Cynet CyOps has been there for us.

See all answers

What do you like most about Cynet?

In terms of incident response, Cynet can contain attacks, offer a trial period to customers, and uninstall if not continued. The most valuable aspect is its integration capabilities, covering endpo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cynet?

The pricing is quite reasonable.

See all answers

What do you like most about Varonis Platform?

The solution has significantly improved data security and compliance posture by allowing us to track and monitor activities. We can see who accesses data and when files are created and understand w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Varonis Platform?

Varonis started as an on-premises solution and is transitioning to cloud. It hasn't fully moved yet, which is an area for improvement. Varonis requires more access permissions for its core function...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Varonis Platform?

The primary use case for Varonis Platform is data discovery, specifically for discovering sensitive data in our organization to protect it. We are looking for a solution that can scan our repositor...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cynet

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cynet

Compared 7% of the time

Darktrace vs Cynet

Compared 6% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Cynet

Compared 6% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Cynet

Compared 5% of the time

More Cynet Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Varonis Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Cyera vs Varonis Platform

Compared 11% of the time

BigID vs Varonis Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz vs Varonis Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Purview Information Protection vs Varonis Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Varonis Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cynet

September 2025

Download Cynet product report

Buyer's Guide

Varonis Platform

August 2025

Download Varonis Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

SlashNext Complete

Overview

Cynet provides comprehensive endpoint protection and advanced threat detection, offering intuitive deployment and monitored support. It ensures real-time visibility and minimal management, enhancing security for diverse and remote teams.

Cynet integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, providing an efficient solution for endpoint protection, threat detection, and response. Its automation, scalability, and stability are key benefits. Users benefit from real-time network visibility, ransomware protection, and deception capabilities. Cynet serves as a robust alternative to CrowdStrike, offering a multifaceted approach to security operations, especially in environments needing continuous threat monitoring and zero-day threat management. Areas needing improvement include mobile device support, enhanced reporting, third-party integrations, and AI-based detection.

What are Cynet's most important features?

Intuitive UI: Simplifies navigation for efficient security management.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup reduces time and resource investment.
Comprehensive Endpoint Protection: Shields workstations and networks effectively.
Advanced Threat Detection: Identifies threats in real-time for prompt action.
Automation: Streamlines processes for better resource allocation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing supports budget adherence.
Integration Capabilities: Fit with existing systems enhances operational cohesion.
Scalability: Grows with organizational demands, ensuring sustained performance.
Minimal Management Requirements: Reduces administrative overhead.

In the financial sector, Cynet's ability to support efficient threat detection and endpoint protection is crucial. Healthcare industries leverage its data protection features for compliance and security. In manufacturing, real-time threat monitoring supports safeguarding intellectual property. Retail sectors benefit from its scalability and minimal management demands, helping secure diverse, distributed locations.

Cynet

Varonis Platform enhances data security and governance with advanced analytics, identifying unusual access patterns and sensitive areas. Its centralized interface manages permissions across systems, offering essential capabilities for alerting and reporting.

Varonis Platform provides continuous data protection and monitoring by identifying and alerting on unauthorized data access. It offers comprehensive insights into file access and user activities, supporting data classification and simplifying compliance with tracking and monitoring capabilities. Integration with storage systems enables users to manage permissions and access effectively. Room for improvement includes cloud integration and simplifying its interface and calculation engine for ease of use. Challenges include on-premises dependency, licensing costs, and a need for enhanced DLP capabilities.

What are the primary features of Varonis Platform?

24/7 Technical Support: Ensures continuous assistance and issue resolution.
Advanced Analytics: Identifies unusual data access patterns for increased security.
Centralized Permission Management: Manages access permissions across systems.
Data Classification: Categorizes data to enhance protection measures.
Integration with Storage Systems: Simplifies compliance through tracking and monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Security: Protects against unauthorized data access.
Compliance Simplification: Offers comprehensive tracking and monitoring to meet compliance standards.
Efficient Permission Management: Simplifies access controls across platforms.
Enhanced Alerting: Provides timely notifications of potential security breaches.

In finance, Varonis aids in safeguarding sensitive financial data, while in healthcare, it secures patient records. Legal industries utilize it for protecting client information, and retail sectors manage sensitive customer data. These industries benefit from Varonis' ability to prevent unauthorized access and streamline compliance.

Varonis

Sample Customers

Meuhedet, East Boston Neighborhood Health Center

Nottingham Building Society

Buyer's Guide

Cynet vs. Varonis Platform

July 2025

Free Report: Cynet vs. Varonis Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Cynet vs. Varonis Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cynet vs. Varonis Platform report.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors, best Ransomware Protection vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.