We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"What I like best about CylancePROTECT is its accuracy, as it doesn't give many false positives."
"Its setup is simple if you have a Windows device; it is executable."
"What's most valuable in CylancePROTECT is the optics feature. I also like its easy-to-use and user-friendly dashboard and monitoring system."
"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."
"It actively monitors the behavior and activity of processes and will, without hesitation, terminate at root anything it determines to be suspect."
"The solution is easy to deploy."
"One of the best features of the solution is that it's easy to deploy."
"The initial setup of CylancePROTECT is very easy."
"The admin capabilities are great."
"Some of the most valuable features are the security and the stability, which are great. There are some imperfections, but everything is fine. In general, I think it's one of the best solutions."
"It's easy to use."
"It has helped our company protect the confidential data of our customers."
"Kaspersky protects our company from ransomware attacks. We have multiple sites across the country, including the principal headquarters and different towns. We can see any viruses that are in the network and take action."
"The solution has been quite stable."
"The stability has been good."
"The interface is friendly."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The solution is not stable."
"If they can add more features on top of their Persona feature that would be ideal."
"An area for improvement in CylancePROTECT is its pricing, as it's a bit costly."
"It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat."
"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."
"It is hard to manage."
"Reporting is an area with shortcomings in CylancePROTECT that needs to be improved."
"CylancePROTECT's dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The price for this EPP platform is expensive and could be improved."
"I'd like to see them improve encryption and remote management in the future. Kaspersky could also improve its scanning technology. Other solutions have adopted machine learning and deep learning, but Kaspersky still uses signature-based scanning."
"Areas for improvement include signature update management and selecting the respective features on the endpoint side."
"It's grown more expensive and customers are not happy about it."
"We would like to see improved performance and faster deployment in the next release."
"The product needs to incorporate training programs or webinars for users. The solution needs to improve its support as well. It also needs to detect ransomware."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"The installation is technical. You need to be certified."
"The solution could be more secure."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 28th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 10 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 10th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 30 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 7.4, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "It has an easy-to-use dashboard and monitoring system and comes with an optics feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "It's reliable and secure, but the monitoring and notifications could be more detailed ". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Intercept X Endpoint and Fortinet FortiClient. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.