Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cyble Vision vs Fortinet FortiRecon comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cyble Vision
Ranking in Digital Risk Protection
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (91st), Security Incident Response (23rd), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (42nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (36th)
Fortinet FortiRecon
Ranking in Digital Risk Protection
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Digital Risk Protection category, the mindshare of Cyble Vision is 3.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiRecon is 5.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Risk Protection Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Fortinet FortiRecon5.8%
Cyble Vision3.6%
Other90.6%
Digital Risk Protection
 

Featured Reviews

Use Cyble Vision?
Leave a review
Muhammad Hassaan Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at Commtel
Has improved threat visibility and simplified operations but needs better integration with other platforms
The only feature I would recommend for Fortinet FortiRecon is smoother integration with third-party SIEM and SOAR platforms. For instance, we use IBM QRadar and it would be ideal if FortiRecon’s threat intelligence findings could be pushed directly into QRadar rather than requiring manual exports or custom API setups Cross-platform integration should be made easier. While FortiRecon provides useful threat intelligence, getting this data into other SIEMs like IBM QRadar or open-source platforms like Wazuh often requires custom API work or manual steps. Fortinet tends to keep things within its own ecosystem, which makes third-party integration more challenging. On the positive side, FortiRecon has one of the easiest GUIs compared to other competitors, making it straightforward to navigate findings and alerts.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Risk Protection solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Media Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
10%
University
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiRecon?
The reporting and alerts in Fortinet FortiRecon need to be improved and support is another area of potential improvement. Engaging the support team with Fortinet FortiRecon takes more time than exp...
What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiRecon?
We are using Fortinet FortiRecon as a threat intelligence platform for protecting our company. We have added two or three more products from Fortinet. We are working with solutions from Fortinet in...
What advice do you have for others considering Fortinet FortiRecon?
I am using all these applications for our infrastructure, including Fortinet FortiRecon and Fortinet SOAR. If we talk about the threat intelligence platform, dark web monitoring is a very basic fea...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, ZeroFOX, Proofpoint and others in Digital Risk Protection. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.