Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Identity vs WorkOS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (9th), Identity Management (IM) (10th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (8th), Cloud Resource Access Management (2nd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (8th)
WorkOS
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CyberArk Identity is designed for Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) and holds a mindshare of 3.7%, up 3.4% compared to last year.
WorkOS, on the other hand, focuses on Single Sign-On (SSO), holds 1.0% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
Single Sign-On (SSO)
 

Featured Reviews

Julio Montero - PeerSpot reviewer
Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication
The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?
The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?
The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged.
What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?
Some areas experience slowness based on the workload. There's a need to enhance network performance despite the good user experience with access management.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Idaptive
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
1. Airbnb 2. Atlassian 3. Baidu 4. Cisco 5. Databricks 6. Dell Technologies 7. Dolby 8. Dropbox 9. Equinix 10. Expedia 11. Google 12. HubSpot 13. IBM 14. Intel 15. Intuit 16. JetBlue 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. MongoDB 21. Netflix 22. Nvidia 23. Pinterest 24. Qualcomm 25. Salesforce 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Square 29. Stripe 30. Twitter 31. Uber 32. VMware
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Okta and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: June 2025.
859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.