We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"The setup, via cloud, is simple."
"The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward."
"If anyone makes an error, or if an incident occurs by accident, the business will not be harmed as a result of this activity."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS."
"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."
"The solution has high support capability."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pros →
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."
"The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."
"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."
"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Cons →
More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is ranked 26th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management writes "A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing ". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and PingFederate, whereas i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
