IBM Security QRadar and CrowdStrike Falcon Complete compete in the cybersecurity domain. IBM Security QRadar appears to have the upper hand due to its robust data integration and management capabilities, which provides a comprehensive view of security across various data sources.
Features: QRadar provides ease of extraction from raw logs, scalability, and a user-friendly interface with user behavior analytics. It excels in log management and SIEM. On the other hand, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete offers advanced threat intelligence, managed detection, and a lightweight agent with AI-based protection, providing real-time updates and robust endpoint security.
Room for Improvement: QRadar can improve incident management, visualization tools, and integration with external applications. Enhancing technical support response and reducing costs are also areas for growth. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete could benefit from enhanced automation, a more intuitive interface, improved performance in certain use cases, and broader support for offline devices, alongside reducing overall costs.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QRadar requires extensive on-premises deployment, which can be resource-intensive. Customer service is generally efficient, though technical support can vary. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete provides an easier cloud-based deployment with strong and proactive support, receiving high praise for its responsiveness in security monitoring services.
Pricing and ROI: QRadar is known for its high cost due to its extensive capabilities, making it suitable for larger enterprises with significant budgets, but it offers solid ROI through robust security insights. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete also carries a high price tag, positing competitive ROI with its efficient real-time threat detection. It follows a pricing model based on endpoints, which can be challenging for smaller enterprises. Both solutions justify their costs with comprehensive security features, though budget considerations are essential for potential buyers.
With SOAR, the workflow takes one minute or less to complete the analysis.
Investing this amount was very much worth it for my organization.
it could be quicker
The L1 engineer should be more technical to improve the support.
They assist with advanced issues, such as hardware or other problems, that are not part of standard operations.
Support needs to understand the issue first, then escalate it to the engineering team.
The support is really good; for instance, if a critical ticket is submitted, you will get paged right away as it gets logged, and their analyst will look into it, letting you know as soon as possible so you can work on it.
It is easy to scale with the support of CrowdStrike.
I can deploy a number of clients without impact as long as there are a sufficient number of licenses.
Once all objectives were met, the solution proved to be fully scalable.
For EPS license, if you increase or exceed the EPS license, you cannot receive events.
The solution is stable, like Falcon, and does not cause any problems for the agent to work with minimal memory.
I find that it is very stable; however, there is always room for improvement.
I think QRadar is stable and currently satisfies my needs.
The product has been stable so far.
There are several issues we are facing with CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR, including data overload, noise, and false positive alerts.
Patch management in vulnerabilities needs improvement.
For UI/UX, it is good, but I think they should keep up with the times.
We receive logs from different types of devices and need a way to correlate them effectively.
If AI-related support can suggest rules and integrate with existing security devices like MD, IPS, this SIM can create more relevant rules.
IBM Security QRadar does not support Canvas, so we had to create custom scripts and workarounds to pull logs from Canvas.
From an enterprise level perspective, it should be reduced by approximately 20 to 25%.
Splunk is more expensive than IBM Security QRadar.
We have achieved 100% success in detection with our clients and have no need for reclamation.
I find CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR to be effective and stable, with minimal false positives.
The solution offers seamless SOC extension, zero-day protection, advanced threat intelligence, and rapid incident containment.
Recently, I faced an incident, a cyber incident, and it was detected in real time.
IBM is seeking information about IBM QRadar because a part of QRadar, especially in the cloud, has been sold to Palo Alto.
We have FortiSOAR and IBM Resilient for IBM Security QRadar orchestration.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR | 10.8% |
IBM Security QRadar | 0.9% |
Other | 88.3% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 35 |
Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
Large Enterprise | 30 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 88 |
Midsize Enterprise | 36 |
Large Enterprise | 102 |
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR combines AI-driven detection, real-time threat insight, and robust endpoint protection to deliver a comprehensive managed detection response. It ensures rapid incident handling, integrates smoothly with multiple tools, and minimizes false positives while extending SOC capabilities.
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR stands out with its AI-powered detection and efficient threat intelligence, offering a strong foundation for endpoint security. It features an intuitive dashboard, seamless integration with tools, and swift incident responses, all facilitated by its SOC extension. Users find value in its vulnerability management and lightweight deployment, which reduces false positives. This combines managed threat hunting with automated forensics, enhancing cybersecurity with proactive threat prevention and remediation. Suggested improvements include better reporting, SIEM integration, and performance enhancements to prevent slowdowns. Suggested better API documentation and expanded Linux support align with calls for improved offline intrusion detection and false positive management. Improved customization, integration with third-party tools, aesthetics, pricing, and training options are also desired.
What features make CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR valuable?In various industries, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR is implemented to provide advanced endpoint protection for mobile and server security. Organizations leverage its threat intelligence, behavioral analysis, and vulnerability detection features to defend against ransomware, fileless attacks, and enable EDR functionalities. By facilitating threat hunting and incident response, they ensure continuous monitoring, often integrating with Microsoft Defender and other security measures for robust cybersecurity coverage and efficient patch management.
IBM Security QRadar (recently acquired by Palo Alto Networks) is a security and analytics platform designed to defend against threats and scale security operations. This is done through integrated visibility, investigation, detection, and response. QRadar empowers security groups with actionable insights into high-priority threats by providing visibility into enterprise security data. Through centralized visibility, security teams and analysts can determine their security stance, which areas pose a potential threat, and which areas are critical. This will help streamline workflows by eliminating the need to pivot between tools.
IBM Security QRadar is built to address a wide range of security issues and can be easily scaled with minimal customization effort required. As data is ingested, QRadar administers automated, real-time security intelligence to swiftly and precisely discover and prioritize threats. The platform will issue alerts with actionable, rich context into developing threats. Security teams and analysts can then rapidly respond to minimize the attackers' strike. The solution will provide a complete view of activity in both cloud-based and on-premise environments as a large amount of data is ingested throughout the enterprise. Additionally, QRadar’s anomaly detection intelligence enables security teams to identify any user behavior changes that could be indicators of potential threats.
IBM QRadar Log Manager
To better help organizations protect themselves against potential security threats, attacks, and breaches, IBM QRadar Log Manager gathers, analyzes, preserves, and reports on security log events using QRadar Sense Analytics. All operating systems and applications, servers, devices, and applications are converted into searchable and actionable intelligent data. QRadar Log Manager then helps organizations meet compliance reporting and monitoring requirements, which can be further upgraded to QRadar SIEM for a more superior level of threat protection.
Some of QRadar Log Manager’s key features include:
Reviews from Real Users
IBM Security QRadar is a solution of choice among users because it provides a complete solution for security teams by integrating network analysis, log management, user behavior analytics, threat intelligence, and AI-powered investigations into a single solution. Users particularly like having a single window into their network and its ability to be used for larger enterprises.
Simon T., a cyber security services operations manager at an aerospace/defense firm, notes, "The most valuable thing about QRadar is that you have a single window into your network, SIEM, network flows, and risk management of your assets. If you use Splunk, for instance, then you still need a full packet capture solution, whereas the full packet capture solution is integrated within QRadar. Its application ecosystem makes it very powerful in terms of doing analysis."
A management executive at a security firm says, "What we like about QRadar and the models that IBM has, is it can go from a small-to-medium enterprise to a larger organization, and it gives you the same value."
We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.