No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar vs Qt Squish comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (39th)
Qt Squish
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar is designed for Functional Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, up 0.1% compared to last year.
Qt Squish, on the other hand, focuses on Test Automation Tools, holds 2.3% mindshare, down 3.2% since last year.
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar0.7%
Tricentis Tosca9.7%
OpenText Functional Testing7.8%
Other81.8%
Functional Testing Tools
Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Qt Squish2.3%
Tricentis Tosca10.7%
OpenText Functional Testing7.6%
Other79.4%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Crosscheck Networks SOAPSonar?
Leave a review
Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Test Engineer at Infrabel
Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
21%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need ...
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...
 

Also Known As

SOAPSonar
froglogic Squish
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

San Diego State University, Rumson Capital Advisor, Techlogix
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, OpenText and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: July 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.