Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cross-Enterprise Applicatio...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

85th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText SiteScope	1.1%
Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management	0.4%
Other	98.5%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shahpoup

Senior Deputy Manager, ITSM Architect at ICT Misr

Offers a great reporting experience, with much customization and flexibility in extracting reports but it can be more user-friendly

My experience indicates that it needs enhancements in the UI. We are in 2024, and the GUI doesn't meet current expectations for user interfaces or Excel integration. Mainly, CA Service Desk has such a bad user interface. All features and systems, like servers, should have a modern graphical user interface, but CA Service Desk remains classic and still uses a desktop-based interface. It doesn't add features easily; if you need additional functionality, you have to go through many steps. Competitors like ServiceNow, Micro Focus SMAX, and ManageEngine all have better user interfaces. This is the main solution that needs improvement. I am very satisfied with the modeling systems, the grid, and the existing features, except for the graphical user interface.

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Proactive monitoring has reduced response time and has improved capacity planning accuracy

Regarding areas for improvement, there may be minor issues, but I have not faced any significant issues with OpenText SiteScope because I have a team that uses this product daily. As a monitoring dashboard user, I do not have any negative feedback. A feature that could be added is direct integration with a ticketing tool, as it would help operation teams directly detect alarms and alerts happening in our infrastructure. Direct integration with a ticketing tool such as Remedy would be a good feature. OpenText SiteScope has some limitations, especially with integration between OpenText SiteScope and Remedy, which must be done through middle software. There are also limitations for cloud monitoring as well as for Docker and Kubernetes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All solutions from Broadcom are very easy to install."

"The documentation and the technical support are both quite good."

"Managing SiteScope is not as difficult as its reveal."

"I find OpenText SiteScope itself to be uncomplicated and deserving of a ten out of ten due to its simplicity."

"Being able to do your queries from a single location and being able to nest all your monitors within folders is valuable."

"Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText SiteScope is that it is easy to manage and user-friendly."

"The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."

"System health check monitoring and email alerts after reaching threshold limits."

"SiteScope is deployed on our network perimeter, and gives our operations teams an end user perspective of service availability."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"The UI could be better. When I look at the dashboard, for example, the information looks cluttered and unorganized."

"There is still a lot of improvement that is needed in terms of stability. We figured out that it was not able to monitor or offer some forms of self-service capabilities."

"They lack support and presence in Egypt."

"We'll probably remove SiteScope shortly because we've been using another monitoring tool in production. SiteScope is just not something we use very much of any more."

"If you're considering Sitescope as your sole or primary monitoring tool, I suggest you take a look around - there are better options for you."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files."

"We have four or five data centers around North America where we have it deployed into a single or a two-server primary backup type of deployment. All those are made available under a single GUI provided by Micro Focus that allows you to put them all together. A room for improvement would be an appliance or a server that would manage all of our other servers so that I don't have to remember to log on to all different servers and data centers. I could manage them from a single location."

"You can use OpenText SiteScope for small or middle environments. But if you want to monitor a large environment, it is not scalable. If you can monitor a large environment with OpenText SiteScope, it can be a valuable product."

"As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. So, it is rather cheap. On a yearly basis, we pay $400,000. It is fixed, but it differs from year to year because we can add m...

What needs improvement with Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

What is your primary use case for Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management?

At our bank, we have two teams: * one for Network Operations Center (NOC) and * another for administration and innovation. I am the technical lead in administration. For daily basis, the NOC team u...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

OpenText SiteScope has a lot of use cases including monitoring websites, monitoring URLs, monitoring infrastructure resources like CPU, hard disk, and memory usage, and customized monitoring script...

Zabbix vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Comparisons

Compared 34% of the time

eG Enterprise vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 26% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 11% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

Kloudfuse vs Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

More Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management product report

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management report

OpenText SiteScope

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

CA Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Overview

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management provides comprehensive insight into application performance across organizational boundaries. Designed to address complex application ecosystems, it ensures efficient monitoring and management of performance metrics, enhancing IT operations.

With Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management, organizations can leverage a centralized approach to detecting, diagnosing, and resolving performance issues. The platform's analytics allow for proactive management by identifying trends and anomalies across applications. By offering end-to-end visibility into transactions and resource utilizations, it supports significant improvements in operational efficiency.

What are the key features?

End-to-End Monitoring: Comprehensive monitoring across all components of the application landscape.
Centralized Dashboard: Aggregated data view for quick insights and decision-making.
Real-Time Analytics: Immediate data processing to detect and respond to issues quickly.
Anomaly Detection: Advanced algorithms identify deviations for proactive troubleshooting.
Resource Management: Optimize application resources through detailed usage analysis.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Improved Performance: By leveraging analytics, boost application efficiency and uptime.
Cost Efficiency: Reduced downtimes translate to lower operational costs.
Enhanced Decision Making: Access to reliable data leads to informed strategic decisions.
Increased Productivity: Swift issue resolution improves overall productivity.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management integrates seamlessly to handle complex transactional systems. Its ability to provide real-time visibility and comprehensive analytics means that these sectors can ensure compliance and maintain high service standards.

Broadcom

OpenText SiteScope provides agentless monitoring of infrastructure and applications, offering an intuitive experience with comprehensive solutions for managing APIs, URLs, and log files. It's designed for those seeking ease of use and flexibility without the need for server agents.

SiteScope is known for its agentless architecture that facilitates seamless monitoring across a range of technologies including AWS, VMware, and APIs. Users benefit from ready-to-use templates and an intuitive dashboard. Despite its flexibility, SiteScope has challenges with integration and modern features like cloud and DevOps monitoring. The Java interface is slow and setup can be cumbersome, with costly licensing and room for improvement in reporting and scalability.

What are the key features of OpenText SiteScope?

Agentless Architecture: Eliminates the need for server agents, minimizing intrusion.
Ready-to-Use Templates: Simplifies monitoring setup across different environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Supports server, database, URL, and API monitoring.
Integration Capabilities: Works with AWS, VMware, and other technologies.
Intuitive Dashboard: Provides easy-to-understand data visualization.

What benefits and ROI can be expected?

Cost Efficiency: Agentless setup reduces operational costs.
Flexibility: Supports multiple technologies and environments.
Time Management: Predefined templates save setup time.
Performance Assurance: Ensures consistent performance with synthetic monitoring.
Operational Insight: Enhances decision-making through comprehensive data visualization.

OpenText SiteScope is implemented in industries like healthcare and government organizations for maintaining system performance and uptime. It supports monitoring across platforms, including Linux, Windows, and VMware, enabling users to address infrastructure and application monitoring needs without agent-related challenges.

OpenText

Sample Customers

NIIT Technologies, Cetip Safeguards

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Cross-Enterprise Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope