Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Coupa Invoice vs IBM Maximo comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Coupa Invoice
Ranking in Billing Software
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Maximo
Ranking in Billing Software
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Billing Software category, the mindshare of Coupa Invoice is 2.9%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Maximo is 4.5%, down from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Billing Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1871577 - PeerSpot reviewer
Integrates seamlessly, is simple to install, and has responsive internal technical support
It comes in three sizes: small, medium, and large. There is no problem with scalability or thresholds. It holds up. We have slightly more than 3,000 users globally. The users are everywhere spanning from sales, product development, cost management, professional services, support, and value management are all covered. In my opinion, it's a 100% uptake. There is no second solution. If you don't utilize it you can't do your job.
Jose Pedro Muñoz - PeerSpot reviewer
A very strong and powerful tool in the market preferred by a variety of industries
I rate the technical support a seven out of ten. Three levels of support in IBM. The first one is a fixed level, while levels two and three are very good. Here, level one is not very good, as it takes time to go from level one to level two and from level two to level three. So, level one is of low capacity.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the user interface, which is extremely simple and very modern compared to other similar software available."
"IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"They have a real strength of tracking the asset itself along with the condition of the asset, the maintenance of the asset and who has access to the asset, etc."
"IBM Maximo is a very strong and powerful tool in the market…Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"Preventive maintenance management."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
 

Cons

"Pricing and partner support could be improved."
"IBM is a big company and they have a lot of products. Level One, the first level of tech support, is the one that is used to stop the tsunami. For everyone, it's always work to get past that."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is easy and one is difficult, I rate the setup process a two since it is very complicated."
"Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes."
"The standard reports that shipped with the package need to be enriched with more advanced reports, especially for the Inventory Management sections."
"The latest version is slow due to the power it requires."
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline.​"
"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"It's quite reliable, but new versions often are not too stable. They bring in enhancements but they break other stuff."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"According to what I've heard and understood, it's on the pricey side."
"IBM has changed the licensing policy. As I understand now, they are going from a complex way of licensing to a more simple way of licensing."
"Explore the possibility of using DB2. You will avoid the cost of SQL Server or Oracle licenses."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high, I rate the pricing a nine. The price is very high."
"You pay for what you get. There are lots of options depending on how you would like to implement Maximo."
"​Explore internal processes in order to evaluate the correct number of users in each Maximo module, then evaluate the different offers of pricing and licensing.​"
"I do not know about the price of the solution. However, this has been an expensive project overall."
"IBM Maximo offers a licensing application, and you have to comply with the license."
"The price of IBM Maximo could reduce, it is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Billing Software solutions are best for your needs.
860,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Media Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Maximo
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sanofi, Alder Biopharmaceuticals, Amerinet, Armstrong Worldwide Industries, Auction.com, FirstMerit Bank, Grass Valley, Intermedia, NEC, NPL, ON24, Pandora, SCI, CSAA Insurance Group, World Vision
Royal Boskalis Westminster N.V., DTE Energy, Swedish Match, Projetech, Fingrid, East Coast
Find out what your peers are saying about Zuora, Intuit, NetSuite and others in Billing Software. Updated: June 2025.
860,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.