• Home
  • CouchDB vs. Oracle NoSQL

CouchDB vs Oracle NoSQL comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo

CouchDB

576 views|544 comparisons
Oracle Logo

Oracle NoSQL

Read 7 Oracle NoSQL reviews
1,346 views|1,096 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
NoSQL Databases
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CouchDB and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CouchDB?
GLEDSONCOOPER
The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

    • More Oracle NoSQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:The tool is easy to learn.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:If the use cases change, the cost could be reduced.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:The product must be added to a cloud platform. The link to Oracle must be provided on the cloud platform. It will help people to integrate the tool easily. We need the solution mainly for updating or… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    576
    Comparisons
    544
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    8th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    1,346
    Comparisons
    1,096
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Couchbase logo
    Couchbase vs. CouchDB
    Compared 28% of the time.
    ScyllaDB logo
    ScyllaDB vs. CouchDB
    Compared 20% of the time.
    MongoDB logo
    MongoDB vs. CouchDB
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Apache HBase logo
    Apache HBase vs. CouchDB
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Cassandra vs. CouchDB
    Compared 12% of the time.
    More CouchDB Competitors   →
    MongoDB logo
    MongoDB vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 45% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Cassandra vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 29% of the time.
    ScyllaDB logo
    ScyllaDB vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 8% of the time.
    InfluxDB logo
    InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Couchbase logo
    Couchbase vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 4% of the time.
    More Oracle NoSQL Competitors   →
    Learn More
    Apache
    Oracle
    Overview
    Apache CouchDB is open source database software that focuses on ease of use and having a scalable architecture. It has a document-oriented NoSQL database architecture and is implemented in the concurrency-oriented language Erlang; it uses JSON to store data, JavaScript as its query language using MapReduce, and HTTP for an API.

    The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

    The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

    For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

    Sample Customers
    Verizon, Dimagi Inc., Apple, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Perspecta
    Airbus, Globacom, WebAction
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Educational Organization11%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise58%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CouchDB is ranked 13th in NoSQL Databases while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. CouchDB is rated 0.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". CouchDB is most compared with Couchbase, ScyllaDB, MongoDB, Apache HBase and Cassandra, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Couchbase.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.