Coralogix vs IBM Application Performance Management comparison

Coralogix and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.2, while IBM is ranked #52 with an average rating of 7.0. Coralogix holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 62% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

2,838 Views
1,589 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Application Performance...

Read 7 IBM Application Performance Management reviews

833 Views
808 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

Coralogix

IBM Application Performance...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Coralogix and IBM Application Performance Management are two popular products in the performance monitoring space. Coralogix is often preferred for its competitive pricing and customer support, while IBM is favored for its robust features that users feel justify the higher cost.

Features: Coralogix is praised for its ease of use, real-time monitoring, and comprehensive analytics. IBM Application Performance Management stands out for its scalability, advanced diagnostics, and integration capabilities. Coralogix is noted for its intuitive setup, while IBM is recognized for its extensive feature set, especially for larger enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix users suggest enhancements in dashboard customization, more detailed documentation, and additional flexibility. IBM Application Performance Management users recommend better user training materials, a more streamlined update process, and a focus on user education.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix is reported to have a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. IBM Application Performance Management is seen as more complex to deploy but is backed by a robust support team.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is noted for its affordable setup costs and quick ROI, making it a preferred choice for smaller to mid-sized companies. IBM Application Performance Management, while more expensive upfront, is justified by users through its long-term capabilities and value for larger organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. IBM Application Performance Management

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (21st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (23rd), API Management (15th), Streaming Analytics (14th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

IBM Application Performance...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

52nd

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Application Performance Management is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Coralogix	1.1%
IBM Application Performance Management	0.5%
Other	98.4%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez

Head SRE Latam at PayU

SaaS platform used by developers to store and conveniently search for logs

If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that. I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion. Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.

Read full review

Daniel Tamiru

Manager, Database & System Administration at Awash International Bank

A multi-functional solution but has poor stability and performance-related issues

We are using version 4 of IBM Application Performance Management, and it is deployed on-premises. We use it for internet banking and mainly for application performance on-site. For example, if we face performance-related issues in one of our software or managed services, we use this solution to…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"The overall stability and reliability of Coralogix are excellent, and I rarely encounter issues."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

More Coralogix pros

"It's easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the breakdown that it provides, such as a description of the fields for a particular transaction."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"IBM Application Performance Management helped us increased our response time by 80% and cost 60% less."

"The transaction tracking feature from IBM is the most important feature for us. It is something that provides a terrific value for us and our clients. It has a lot of data sources and agents that are collectors. It is also stable."

"The initial setup was straightforward and took minimal effort."

"Because we have partnerships with other partners, I can share a bit about what I've noticed with IBM APM compared to other vendor solutions. Specifically, with IBM, the visibility into detailed process information is more tangible. On the OS level, APM displays all processes (or the top 10 processes) that are consuming CPU or resident memory. This is the most important thing that is not always available with other vendors."

Cons

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

More Coralogix cons

"Technical support can be slow and needs improvement."

"The demo that was provided to us is not working very well. At times, there are errors."

"With APM, we noticed that the agent can cause a lot of issues for the application, making the agent very unreliable. Many issues are happening, and we've had to discuss it with support to try and get a fix. It affects application availability, and sometimes actions fail because of the agent, degrading the performance of the application."

"The stability is not great and should be better."

"Its web user interface is a little bit old in comparison to other solutions, such as New Relic, and it should be improved. Its scalability and technical support should also be improved. Currently, it is scalable, but only in a vertical way. They provide good technical support, but the initial steps for a new case can be improved to fasten the resolution process."

"They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy."

"It's still missing some platforms. For example, if you look to applications itself, it is missing the interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"IBM APM is one of the cheaper products on the market, while everything necessary to get started is included in the license."

"As I previously indicated, I initiated the IBM and uncovered all its elements. Consequently, I'm not inclined towards a licensing approach."

"The licensing fees can be paid every six months or on a yearly basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

25%

Retailer

14%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Application Performance Management?

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Application Performance Management?

They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Application Performance Management?

I monitor business applications for more than four end users.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 23% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 9% of the time

Logz.io vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

BMC AMI Strobe vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 16% of the time

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 13% of the time

Datadog vs IBM Application Performance Management

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM Application Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

October 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2025

IBM Application Performance Management report

Download IBM Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM APM

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

The IBM Application Performance Management portfolio provides visibility, control and automation of your mission-critical applications. It helps pinpoint the root cause of application's issue more quickly and resolve the problem. The integrated capabilities cover the five key areas: discovery, end-use experience, transaction tracking, enterprise diagnostics and analytics. It also easily monitors applications to ensure optimal performance to extend your hybrid management environment capabilities, to measure the customer experience from multiple locations and to further eliminate blind spots in your application environment.

IBM

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Mibtree, EatDrinkDeals.com, IT Performance Advisor

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. IBM Application Performance Management

September 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. IBM Application Performance Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. IBM Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. IBM Application Performance Management report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.