ComponentOne Studio Enterprise vs StrongLoop LoopBack comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
6th
out of 14 in Software Components
Views
210
Comparisons
154
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 14 in Software Components
Views
84
Comparisons
47
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Studio Enterprise
Learn More
Overview
ComponentOne Studio Enterprise has Extensible, Performant Controls that Delivers streamlined, faster apps and avoid bloat with our small assemblies. Provides Seamless Visual Studio Integration that Designed for Visual Studio's ecosystem, our controls let you work comfortably and efficiently. And has a Unified Code Base that Shrink learning curve by reusing code across platforms.

LoopBack is a highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to:

  • Create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding.
  • Access data from major relational databases, MongoDB, SOAP, and REST APIs.
  • Incorporate model relationships and access controls for complex APIs.
  • Use separable components for file storage, third-party login, and OAuth 2.0.
Sample Customers
Skemaz, Clear Measure, ITSBITS Inc., Situs, Schoolwires, SharpCloud, LifeLink Foundation Inc., StarPrint Limited, Automobile Insurers Bureau, LogixPower, ALSTOM, BAIR Analytics
Telefonica | Vivo, meteolytix GmbH

ComponentOne Studio Enterprise is ranked 6th in Software Components while StrongLoop LoopBack is ranked 11th in Software Components. ComponentOne Studio Enterprise is rated 0.0, while StrongLoop LoopBack is rated 0.0. On the other hand, ComponentOne Studio Enterprise is most compared with Infragistics .NET Controls, whereas StrongLoop LoopBack is most compared with IBM API Connect.

See our list of best Software Components vendors.

We monitor all Software Components reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.